Quest4Treasure Archives
Archive Home : Verses : Images
maltedfalcon
2018-02-23 23:43:00
strike13 wrote::
i think there are many maps in every image, and they just keep getting more and more intricate and narrowed down to where exactly the casque is at. Boy that would be nice, of course I haven't seen any evidence of that ever....
Macfos
2018-02-23 23:48:00
Agreed. I have lived here a long time and the map on the mask forehead is all I can see. I am not sure the tree branch can be called a map. It is just a road with a possible reference to our old bridges.
Regards,
Mac
drunknerds
2018-02-23 23:52:00
MrSeabass wrote::
I've been to Charleston more times than I've been to the bathroom. I've been to so many parts of the city that I could claim it under adverse possession laws.
Other than the potential pear branch/highway connection and the blatant Ft. Sumter pendant, there is NO map anywhere else on that image. Not a hint of one, not a subset of one, not a mirror/invert/fisheye/stretched version of one. Full stop. and, uh, this one
maltedfalcon
2018-02-23 23:57:00
drunknerds wrote::
and, uh, this one well that and fort sumter...
strike13
2018-02-24 00:03:00
maltedfalcon wrote::
well that and fort sumter... So like i said, totally, maps. I am definitely not claiming to know it all haha. Or how each image works. I'm Boston anyway. But starting to look more at the others as I go. Thanks for the input...i enjoy swapping the ideas. Def wasn't saying that my map ideas of Charleston were right either, just sharing what i saw. Now time for a good new england style IPA.
drunknerds
2018-02-24 00:08:00
maltedfalcon wrote::
well that and fort sumter... Haha, I was about to make the exact same joke.
Smokey Joe Would
2018-02-24 01:32:00
Mac, I have not read all the 1000 comments here, but I am wondering if anyone has been to the library there in Charleston to check articles about the switch of the capstan and the Moultrie statue. There should be some companies involved that might still have some records of the exchange. I have tried to look online, but you have to pay $40 to get an out of state library card.
drunknerds
2018-02-24 01:37:00
Smokey Joe Would wrote::
Mac, I have not read all the 1000 comments here, but I am wondering if anyone has been to the library there in Charleston to check articles about the switch of the capstan and the Moultrie statue. There should be some companies involved that might still have some records of the exchange. I have tried to look online, but you have to pay $40 to get an out of state library card. May be useful, maybe they found something.
Although burnside said he poked around there and it's packed clay no more than 2 feet down
Smokey Joe Would
2018-02-24 01:45:00
10-4. I am also sure that area has been poked and prodded a lot, especially in the last few weeks. Plus that place is pretty open and Preiss would have to had been pretty ballsy to dig there. Just seems like a lot of evidence points there, if that is even the right verse. So fantastically frustrating!!
Macfos
2018-02-24 01:46:00
I dont recall any detailed info about how it was swapped. I would figure they filled the area with clay type substance and then laid the crushed oysters on top for the path.
I dont have a library card but can still go to the library next time I get downtown.
Regards,
Mac
Smokey Joe Would
2018-02-24 01:56:00
I dont recall any detailed info about how it was swapped. I would figure they filled the area with clay type substance and then laid the crushed oysters on top for the path.
I dont have a library card but can still go to the library next time I get downtown.
Regards,
Thanks, i am sure that most of the folks on here have exausted a lot of trails. I was trying to go in from a different angle. If there are any untried ones left.
drunknerds
2018-02-24 02:43:00
Smokey Joe Would wrote::
10-4. I am also sure that area has been poked and prodded a lot, especially in the last few weeks. Plus that place is pretty open and Preiss would have to had been pretty ballsy to dig there. Just seems like a lot of evidence points there, if that is even the right verse. So fantastically frustrating!! I was once convinced it was WPG, now I'm not. There are so many weird things in the painting: Hex eyes, diagonal teeth, etc. There are a lot of statues in WPG, still there like they were in 1982. It's really weird to me that Preiss wouldn't have included at least one match of a park item to an image item. FInd those eyes or those teeth and that's a location I'll champion.
JamesV
2018-02-24 02:57:00
As much as I hate to acknowledge the I2/V6 WPG theory in any way,
if you feel like exploring this one further you should definitely fire off a quick email to the City of Charleston's Parks and Recreation Department:
https://www.charlestonparksconservancy. ... int-garden
. They can almost certainly provide more information on the relocation of the USS Maine's capstan, or any of the other monuments in WPG.
If you're in the area and looking for period photos of the area, or any other first-person accounts, be sure to check out the Charleston County Library's South Carolina Room
https://www.ccpl.org/south-carolina-history
at their main branch, 68 Calhoun Street.
FWIW, I started my career working for the city of Charleston, and I've also spent my share of time around WPG (as well as the rest of the city). For the life of me, I still can't figure out why so many hunters think that Byron Preiss would have selected this park, given the book's immigration theme. WPG has a lot of impressive military memorials, but nothing at all related to the area's slave trade...
JamesV
2018-02-24 03:03:00
drunknerds wrote::
FInd those eyes or those teeth and that's a location I'll champion. This is Fort Moultrie's sallyport prior to 1975/76, when it was converted from a military base to a national monument. The slits are now just solid panes of glass, but I've been unable to confirm what they would have looked like in 1981/1982.
Macfos
2018-02-24 03:05:00
What drunknerds said beats me down everyday... the lack of EXACT visual references as shown in the Cleveland, Chicago finds and the new info on NOLA.
We have to find some EXACT visual markers. Most of the image only seems to show "general" Charleston.
Regards,
Mac
Macfos
2018-02-24 03:08:00
With all due respect JamesV, as I have scoured your solve over and over I just dont see Preiss putting the casque at your location. The grass is too manicured and was in 82. Also, the missing tree leaves look nothing like the tree shown in your theory. But just my opinion and I respect your work.
Regards,
Mac
JamesV
2018-02-24 11:25:00
@Mac, no worries at all- IMHO, the real benefit to these forums is how the back-and-forth discussion helps spark new ideas. Feel free to bounce new ideas off me anytime. Everyone on Q4T would agree, a puzzle isn't solved until you've got a casque in hand.
Smokey Joe Would
2018-02-24 15:16:00
I have also tried to match a statue with the fairie, but can not for the life of me. Sullivan's Island actually makes more sense as it was so connected with slavery. I have just struggled with the thought that he would bury it at a National Park site. If we could confirm which verse, it would certainly help. But, I guess that is why we haven't found it yet.
erexere
2018-02-24 16:14:00
I have a new theory in development. Based on the LotJ, I think the first order of business is to understand The reference of "bright harvest of the midnight rock": cotton. It was the "cotton gin" that factored into the increased demand for slaves for cotton harvests. The same goes for tobacco.
I think it's possible the "tree spirits" of Africa were mindful of this device that led to the Civil War. Strangely, ironically, the word "gin" is also a "spirit". This leads me to wonder if there's a prohibition era link to the puzzle. Perhaps that is why verse 6 begins with the age of rum running pirates.
gManTexas
2018-02-24 16:58:00
erexere wrote::
I have a new theory in development. Based on the LotJ, I think the first order of business is to understand The reference of "bright harvest of the midnight rock": cotton. It was the "cotton gin" that factored into the increased demand for slaves for cotton harvests. The same goes for tobacco.
I think it's possible the "tree spirits" of Africa were mindful of this device that led to the Civil War. Strangely, ironically, the word "gin" is also a "spirit". This leads me to wonder if there's a prohibition era link to the puzzle. Perhaps that is why verse 6 begins with the age of rum running pirates. This would have a lots of legs if prohibition was ratified or went into effect on the 8th of something.
erexere
2018-02-24 18:12:00
gManTexas wrote::
This would have a lots of legs if prohibition was ratified or went into effect on the 8th of something. It has legs as is. We don't want to get too wrapped up in running with a single idea. I think it's more important to consider Preiss' strategies in linking each fair folk to a particular setting. There are several lines linked together for some reason, and not because they are talking about the same thing.
Or May 1913: seems to me like a trick reference to whoever was the MAY-OR of Charleston in 1913. We're talking about John P. Grace (namesake of the Bridge).
Edwin and Edwina, named after him: without knowing the tough to find Abroad in America reference, you think twin babies taking on an important person's name (succession), Edward being a good possibility. I like that the choice of Edwin/Edwina both have the letters WIN as in twin. I think there's something there trying to nudge us into an analogy to two dissimilar things sharing the same namesake.
Freedom at the birth of a century: I've thought it links best to a Presidential medal of Freedom recipient on a year which is 100 years or 200 years from the birth of our Nation.
Or on the 8th a scene / where law defended: seems like it refers to a criminal act. My favorite is the story that's been cited in several magazine/newspaper sources about a murder at a lighthouse that occurred on April 8th in 1873.
I find it odd as hell that you can travel in the direction of the Grace Memorial bridge out of Charleston and 30 miles away you come to a pair of twin lighthouses, which look very different from one another, but built side by side, where a keeper with the name Andrew Johnson, murdered his wife; Johnson is the name of 1977 Medal of Freedom recipient Lady Bird Johnson (200 years after 1776 birth of our nation). It may be noteworthy that the verse for this image also mentions birds a couple times. Also it seems to be reinforced if you consider the name of the Vice President (close at hand in the white house) at the time of Sumter's events of the Civil War is also Andrew Johnson.
gManTexas
2018-02-24 18:31:00
This would make a great Oliver Stone movie. Although I like some of this theory.
erexere
2018-02-24 19:00:00
gManTexas wrote::
This would make a great Oliver Stone movie. Although I like some of this theory. I was thinking more of a Scorsese and his single long shots in Goodfellas.
I've worked hard to find these facts, harder to understand their nature, even harder to conclude they were accessible to the general public in a pre internet era.
drunknerds
2018-02-24 19:18:00
I think the world of you, erexere. No one else can do what you do, and I hope you lift a casque someday soon.
On that note, I'm not 100% convinced that "cryptic reference to cotton = prohibition =
" is going to be part of a solution.
erexere
2018-02-24 19:58:00
Yeah, just wondering how the Fair Folk would view the whole slavery, crop industry, and civil war without taking to the bottle. The "cotton gin" as an insight may be weakish word play. I think it's one of the better choices for what.to do with the LotJ.
phinetic
2018-03-06 03:23:00
Hey everyone.
I'm new here, but noticed this the other day while I was in sulivans island. If it helps anyone please keep me posted. I'm close by and I'm down for a dig if anyone feels like it.
https://imgur.com/a/PsStJ
gManTexas
2018-03-06 03:28:00
phinetic wrote::
Hey everyone.
I'm new here, but noticed this the other day while I was in sulivans island. If it helps anyone please keep me posted. I'm close by and I'm down for a dig if anyone feels like it.
https://imgur.com/a/PsStJ Man if that said Diamond Street instead of ruby. Well seen!
fox
2018-03-06 03:30:00
phinetic wrote::
Hey everyone.
I'm new here, but noticed this the other day while I was in sulivans island. If it helps anyone please keep me posted. I'm close by and I'm down for a dig if anyone feels like it.
https://imgur.com/a/PsStJ
graceandhayes
2018-03-06 12:26:00
Just wanted to comment that Ruby Dr is not on Sullivans Island. It is in Mt Pleasant, across the Ben Sawyer bridge from SI, in an area referred to as the "Old Village". While historic I don't think there are any links to either Image 2 or Verse 6 there. I know because I live about 6 blocks from the Ruby Dr shown in your image. Keep searching, and best wishes. Happy Hunting! Chris
phinetic
2018-03-06 15:46:00
Do you guys think the casque was dug up when they switched statues (for Moultaire)? Also if you are on battery street looking at Moultaire, would the treasure be buried on the left or the right? In the image the triangle of the fairy’s garments points down and to the right (or the ferry’s left), which would mean it would be on the right hand side of the statue facing the houses (White House close at hand). I honestly think this is the spot. Why not grab a metal detector to just see if in fact there is anything there (no digging) and proceed from there?
graceandhayes
2018-03-06 16:00:00
Personally I don't think it is, or was, buried in White Point Garden. I have been hunting for a couple months, and my current thinking is in downtown Charleston, but not WPG. I think I have narrowed it down to a couple likely spots, but looking for the ah-ha moment when I can narrow it down enough to consider probing or digging.
drunknerds
2018-03-06 16:20:00
phinetic wrote::
Do you guys think the casque was dug up when they switched statues (for Moultaire)? Also if you are on battery street looking at Moultaire, would the treasure be buried on the left or the right? In the image the triangle of the fairy’s garments points down and to the right (or the ferry’s left), which would mean it would be on the right hand side of the statue facing the houses (White House close at hand). I honestly think this is the spot. Why not grab a metal detector to just see if in fact there is anything there (no digging) and proceed from there? graceandhayes wrote::
Personally I don't think it is, or was, buried in White Point Garden. I have been hunting for a couple months, and my current thinking is in downtown Charleston, but not WPG. I think I have narrowed it down to a couple likely spots, but looking for the ah-ha moment when I can narrow it down enough to consider probing or digging. Great questions. The current consensus is that they left the base of the capistan, so there wasn't much need to dig. Also, it's apparently only 2 feet down before you hit solid clay, so a lot of people have just rummaged through down to the bottom all around the statue.
It freaks me out that WPG is small and has limited artwork, yet no one has found an image match beyond "blue circle with white circle inside it, that isn't really the same size as the cannon hole." That's what it takes to convince me: Anyone can interpret flowery prose into any solution they want.
I've spent a long time google image searching every single park for some sort of hexagonal shape, or double archway, or pointy teeth, or anything, and it's just not findable from an armchair. At least not by me. I bet this one is going to be cracked open by someone putting boots on the ground, and noticing something really cool not visible from an online streetview.
graceandhayes
2018-03-06 16:43:00
I did some research on what was done to the soil when the Maine capstan was replaced by the Moultrie statue. I found this in a book titled "A Walk in the Parks" by John R. Young, who is an official tour guide registered with the City of Charleston. On page 27 of the book, in reference to the Moultrie statue, it says, "In April 2007, the battleship Maine's capstan was removed from the site. In May, the soil was strengthened to accommodate the new base and statue. A concrete pad was laid atop the newly compacted soil." From viewing pictures of both monuments, the base of the Maine capstan appears to have a similar footprint, maybe a little larger, as the Moultrie statue, but was significantly lower in height. The Maine base appears from photos to have been either poured concrete, or concrete covering brick or block, painted white. The base of the Moultie statue is made of 5 pieces of stacked granite. I do not believe the casque was buried on the west side of the Maine capstan, but if it was, I would agree it is likely gone or destroyed by the compaction of the soil and placement of the concrete pad, which is still visible below the Moultrie statue base.
drunknerds
2018-03-06 16:48:00
graceandhayes wrote::
I did some research on what was done to the soil when the Maine capstan was replaced by the Moultrie statue. I found this in a book titled "A Walk in the Parks" by John R. Young, who is an official tour guide registered with the City of Charleston. On page 27 of the book, in reference to the Moultrie statue, it says, "In April 2007, the battleship Maine's capstan was removed from the site. In May, the soil was strengthened to accommodate the new base and statue. A concrete pad was laid atop the newly compacted soil." From viewing pictures of both monuments, the base of the Maine capstan appears to have a similar footprint, maybe a little larger, as the Moultrie statue, but was significantly lower in height. The Maine base appears from photos to have been either poured concrete, or concrete covering brick or block, painted white. The base of the Moultie statue is made of 5 pieces of stacked granite. I do not believe the casque was buried on the west side of the Maine capstan, but if it was, I would agree it is likely gone or destroyed by the compaction of the soil and placement of the concrete pad, which is still visible below the Moultrie statue base. This was amazing research! You're going to be a valuable resource here, I can tell.
I think the cask was never there, because the clay is two feet down. That means the top of the cask would be ~15 inches under the ground. Maybe Preiss would have consider that a "safe" enough spot, but I don't know, dude seemed to like digging.
Also, I kind of feel like someone who cared so much as to write about the monument switch in such detail would have also thought it important that a huge section of a box was found and some cask remnants. Although I guess a bulldozer might prevent that discovery.
phinetic
2018-03-06 17:50:00
Drunknerdz, there is. If you look at the lions nose, it replicates, almost exactly, the old statue that used to sit were Moultaire is now standing (USS Maine Capstan . On the North side of the old statue (facing the White House close at hand!) Had engraved: Presented by the Navy Department to the city of charleston through the courtesy of US Senator Benjamin R Tillman,
May, 1913
If this isn’t the spot, I don’t know where is.
graceandhayes
2018-03-06 18:08:00
I think the May 1913 clue is too obvious. I don't think BP would have buried a casque right under a plaque containing the exact words in the verse. Just my opinion, seems too easy. Also, any digging by the public has been illegal in WPG for many years, and was illegal at the time BP would have buried the casque. I don't think BP would have buried the casque in WPG for this reason. He admitted to wearing costumes or uniforms when burying some of the casques, but I think this was drawn to avoid attention and questions, not because he was trying to hide illegal activity. The location of the Maine/Moultrie in WPG is very visible. It is in the middle of a main path through the park, and right next to a busy street with both car and pedestrian traffic. I can't prove any of this, unless I find the casque somewhere else, but I spent a few days in and around WPG, and I just don't think this is the spot. If it was there, I believe it would have been destroyed or discarded when the Maine capstan was removed. With regards to the lions nose. I have stared at it for a long time, and while it may be similar, I don't think it is close enough to be a clue to the capstan. Just looks like a lions nose to me.
phinetic
2018-03-06 18:12:00
So do you think the roads leading towards Sullivan Island, MNT pleasant, or Fort Moultaire is a clue it’s out that way somewhere?
graceandhayes
2018-03-06 18:17:00
Also don't buy into the cannons on either side being the arms extended, and the capstan being the bar that binds. Why give a direct reference to the exact spot early in the verse, then in the lines that seem to be pointing to the exact location use more cryptic hints. Just doesn't work for me. I think extended arms could be referring to actual arms, guns or cannons, or in Charleston there is a popular style of staircase outside many homes and building called "Welcoming Arms Stairs". Google it for an example. I think this may be the extended arms. Just my current thought. Either way, if you believe the casque was buried beneath the Maine capstan, then game over. It is most likely gone forever. Even if it was still there, the city will not issue a permit to dig in WPG unless for a registered archeological dig. That is why I continue to search other possible locations. Hoping to find another location that fits the verse, and has something that matches the image.
graceandhayes
2018-03-06 18:19:00
No, I think the roads, Pear(man) bridge, Ft Sumter, etc are either just clues to Charleston in general. Or could be show the path from SI to Charleston. The slaves were brought to SI first and quarantined in shacks on the beach before being brought to Charleston for sale.
graceandhayes
2018-03-06 18:23:00
Problem with Ft Moultrie is again you can't dig there. Ft Moultrie and Ft Sumter are federal property and any digging or metal detecting is strictly forbidden. You will be arrested if you even set foot on the property with digging tools or a metal detector. I talked to some of the rangers there. They said no way a private citizen would ever be given permission to dig there.
phinetic
2018-03-06 19:01:00
My thought process was that the Charelston map on the mask would narrow down the area but that all the other clues would bring you towards the casque, whether that be in Charelston or not. My thought process was the road going out from Charelston was a clue. It would seem redundant to me to use the charelston map in the mask to only have pear road going back towards Charelston. Seems to me since the road goes from left to right, and more importantly towards the diamond, we should follow it.
Who knows though I'm usually wrong with these things lol. Just thinking out loud.
graceandhayes
2018-03-06 19:29:00
I followed the same logic, and tried using both verse 5 and verse 6. Ultimately all the clues I found pointed to Ft Moultrie as the only likely spot on SI. Again, per the rangers there, the NPS would never give permission for a private individual to dig on Ft Moultrie property. Not many other public spaces on SI other than the beach and a town park by the fire station. If it is on SI it would have to be at Ft Moultrie. So, your choices are: perform an illegal dig in the middle of the night, beg for permission you will never get, or if you are sure it is there, accept the fact it will likely never be recovered. For me all those are game over. For that reason, like WPG, I want to believe BP put the casque where it can be recovered without breaking any laws, and it must be somewhere else.
graceandhayes
2018-03-06 19:36:00
So, that leads me to the question, if you think it is on SI, which verse are you using, and how does it match to locations on SI? Other than an African fang mask being on display in the Ft Moultrie visitors center and there are lots of cannons at Ft Moultrie, what other clues in the verse, or the image, lead you to SI.
drunknerds
2018-03-06 20:18:00
The skull mask is a huge link to SI. Even if is just another general location clue, the literary-loving Preiss had to have meant it to reference The Gold Bug
drunknerds
2018-03-06 20:21:00
MrSeabass wrote::
As of now, just the road. And likewise burying something at a protected fort would be a very bad idea, even more so when sumter is in the image and moultrie is not.
Someone else came up with the strings coming off the necklace and overlaying it onto a map to show the area between them as places to prospect. Edward's Park is something I'm researching as it fits things... somewhat. For now I'm focused more on the image than the verse, but still use verse 6 as a guideline.
It's a very weak assessment, I admit... What are those extremely similar blue lines to the left of Sumter?
drunknerds
2018-03-06 20:21:00
double post
phinetic
2018-03-06 20:30:00
Bear with me cause I found two clues which point to different directions.
Found this regarding the statue at WPG from the sculptor, his own words.
1.
[O]n October 20, 1932, the people of Charleston (eight thousand in attendance) dedicated a monument at White Point Gardens, the Battery, to the Confederate defenders of Fort Sumter...Many present had
fathers, uncles, and grandfathers who had fought
in what many still called "the Confederate War." The sculptor Herman A. MacNeil said of the monument:
"Its motif in brief, is that the stalwart youth, standing in front with sword and shield symbolizes by his attitude the defense not only of the fort, but also of the fair city behind the fort in which are his most prized possessions, wife and family. And she, the wife, glorified into an
Athena-like woman, unafraid, stands behind him with arms outstretched toward the fort
, this creating an inseparable union of the city and Fort Sumter."
I feel like this descrption fits the first part of verse 6:
Of all the romance retold
Men of tales and tunes
Cruel and bold
Seen here
By eyes of old
and
Where law defended
Between two arms extended
I'm not sure how much has changed, but it would be interesting to see if there were any places along the battery (maybe a median between roads, maybe what is now known to be a flower bed?) that would be an ideal spot.
*************************************************************
Seabass, in your response, I am also curious about edwards park. I dont know if you saw my post earlier (
https://imgur.com/a/PsStJ
) but although its Ruby and not diamond, it's still kind of an interesting correlation, especially Edwin and Edwina (Edwards Park). I checked out the area once and the only super concerning thing is that there infact is a white house in Edwards park, although its a police station!! hahahaha.
phinetic
2018-03-06 20:46:00
MrSeabass wrote::
Yeah I noticed the roads a while back but kept them in the 'circumstantial' bin. I'll probably check out the park next time I'm there but not expecting anything new to be discovered.
Also I am iffy about Sullivan's Island, and one of the few things that still attaches me somewhat is doing a full overlay with a map, which ends up with the jewel in one of SI's coves.
Again, very circumstantial and i don't personally feel strongly about the link. I'll point out too that the base of the flower, or essentially, where it's growing from with retrospect to the map, is SC department of Natural Resources.
phinetic
2018-03-06 20:49:00
Is there anything to Sullivans Island Lighthouse? Considering the "pole" in the face has a distinct black tip both in the "shadow" and the pole itself. As you guys probably already know, Sullivans Island Lighthouse is literally black on top with the bottom half white.
graceandhayes
2018-03-06 20:54:00
Honestly, I live very close to Edwards Park. There are some historical sites in the park - the original post office (Patjens), the town hall was here, a house that was used for Revolutionary War soldiers, Ferry St is the street where the dock was to take the ferry between Mt P and CHS, etc. But, there is nothing there, other than a white house, some sand, and palm trees that links it to the verse. This is so obscure and has nothing to do with the slave trade. I find it even more unlikely than WPG that BP would bury the casque here. It is mostly just a dog park now. FYI, When hurricane Hugo hit in 1989 this park was about 5 feet underwater due to the storm surge. Don't think it was here. If it is anywhere in Mt Pleasant it would likely be what we call the Pitt St Bridge. This was the site of the first bridge to SI during the Revolutionary War. It was even a trolley car bridge in the early 20th century I think. It is now a causeway, pier, kayak launch, recreation area/park owned by the town of MT P. Let me know if anyone wants me to take pics or probe anywhere in the old village of Mt Pleasant. Don't think the clues point here, but I am happy to help any treasure hunters.
I have also done some hunting around the SI lighthouse. There is nothing in that area that matches anything in the image or any connection to the verse.
Access on Ft Johnson SCDNR site is also limited. Doubt it is there.
phinetic
2018-03-06 21:05:00
IDK part of me wants to think its actually at Fort Sumpter. It literally is where law defended. It's between two arms extended (Both Fort Moultaire and Johnson). Part of me wonders what implications and how different and scary "land laws" where when he burried the casques, because now I don't know a single public place you could just dig without needing some permit or permission. Maybe he burried it outside of Fort Sumpter and technically at the time it was "whatever as long as its not
in
fort Sumpter", whereas now basically a SWAT team would fall from the sky if they saw you digging there now. It's just so much more difficult this day in age. Same with anywhere near Fort Moultaire. Maybe if it was outside of the Fort nobody cared but now everything around it is off limits given security and what not. I wonder if Byron ever took that into consideration or if he ever followed laws to see if any of his casques could have transitioned into a closed off or illegal area. I suppose after writing the book, putting all the effort in the paintings, the maps, the poems, the pottery and keys and jewels,
theres no way you would alert the readers
that casque X or Y is no longer reachable. You would just probably say to yourself "welp, nobody will ever find that one" and not tell anyone. Legacy lives forever cause nobody can legally dig it up. Treasure always remains.
Sorry, just a ramble.
phinetic
2018-03-06 21:27:00
Right, but like I said, who knows what the laws would have been around Fort Sumter, or any other Fort at the time. Now, present day, no way would you be able to even dig in a 30 foot radius. I think literally all the clues point to it. The ferry (literal boat), fort sumpter literally being on image and between the two arms from WPG. IDK where else this thing could be. I think he had said he assumed most all the casques would be picked up within the first year. I think we're looking too abstractly. The answer is there.
maltedfalcon
2018-03-06 21:35:00
phinetic wrote::
who knows what the laws would have been around Fort Sumter, or any other Fort at the time. OOoo! OOoo! Call on me! I know this...!
Since 1969...
In a national Park.
It is a federal offense
(1) Possessing, destroying, injuring, defacing, removing, digging, or disturbing from its natural state:
(iii) Nonfossilized and fossilized paleontological specimens, cultural or archeological resources, or the parts thereof.
(iv) A mineral resource or cave formation or the parts thereof.
(3) Tossing, throwing or rolling rocks or other items inside caves or caverns, into valleys, canyons, or caverns, down hillsides or mountainsides, or into thermal features.
(5) Walking on, climbing, entering, ascending, descending, or traversing an archeological or cultural resource, monument, or statue, except in designated areas and under conditions established by the superintendent.
(6) Possessing, destroying, injuring, defacing, removing, digging, or disturbing a structure or its furnishing or fixtures, or other cultural or archeological resources.
(7) Possessing or using a mineral or metal detector, magnetometer, side scan sonar, other metal detecting device, or subbottom profiler.
maltedfalcon
2018-03-06 21:41:00
&
(a) Unauthorized excavation, removal, damage, alteration, or defacement of archaeological resources. No person may excavate, remove, damage, or otherwise alter or deface, or attempt to excavate, remove, damage, or otherwise alter or deface any archaeological resource located on public lands or Indian lands unless such activity is pursuant to a permit issued under section 470cc of this title, a permit referred to in section 470cc(h)(2) of this title, or the exemption contained in section 470cc(g)(1) of this title
Also if you dug and found it, not only would they prosecute you they would take the casque and key away and anything you acquired as part of possessing the illegal gained object. (meaning the jewel)
So 6 months in jail and or a $5000 fine....
gManTexas
2018-03-06 21:45:00
I have been working on this for a while and had to do a ton of research. One of the issues with Charleston is that while it has a long history, there is very little displayed with respect to the African narrative and regarding slavery. I believe this puzzle relies heavily on historical events and information, along with the sparse visual clues on the ground.
In fairness, I shared this with a couple of people prior to posting, just to get some feedback and see if someone wanted to probe. In reading this thread today, I sense the same feeling that many of the possible locations are either off limits or just don't seem to line up with the Image and Verse. Having looked at possible solves, nothing seemed complete.
I'll take the story from The Gold Bug as the allegory to this hunt. In The Gold Bug, the narrator is faced with two choices (and a cipher) but initially chooses the wrong one. I think the hunt in White Point Gardens is the initial wrong choice. The second choice, which in the book uncovers the treasure, in my opinion is Hampton Park.
I put the details of the solve on dropbox.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/h2ogmry8k4xym ... n.pdf?dl=0
If you like it, go probe there. If you don't, feel free to pick it apart. While I have been to Charleston years ago, I did not base any of this on being on the ground. Your results may vary. Happy hunting!
gManTexas
2018-03-06 22:04:00
MrSeabass wrote::
Right off the bat, the pond in Hampton Park was completely rebuilt into a different design in 1984. And pretty much everything from the forehead interpretations on down is highly interpretive.
Sorry, but as much as I wanted to link Hampton Park to the solve (especially with the seemingly common Expo theme with most of these cities), this doesn't do it for me. I'm not focused on the pond at all. I'm looking at the eastern side of the park. Speculative interpretations, yes, to a degree. Like I said, there is a dearth of physical objects in any of the parks in Charleston that we can point at and say, "there's our columns!"
One thing I forgot to mention is if we enjoy the concept of map overlays, the gemstone is a virtual replica of the park shape.
Mull it over. I'm seriously not asking to be right. If it works, hey great! If not, it's intellectual fodder.
gManTexas
2018-03-06 22:28:00
MrSeabass wrote::
I'm referring to the 'glasses' match you made. You looked at the park/pond first, then looked for things in the image that fit what you wanted to see. Turns out that's not how the pond looked when the painting was made, so the connection is invalid. And the forehead stain definitely isn't a horsehead. Gemstone looks nothing like the shape of the park; vague rectangle shape != vague rectangle shape. Misses like these turn the solve into a house of cards after that. Okay, throw the glasses out. Forget they exist. Go into your favorite image editing program. Overlay the gem on the park. It's a really, really good match. The irony is that people want image matches, yet when presented with them, they say, nope, not good enough. Has anyone matched anything in Charleston besides Fort Sumter?
Second, While I value your feedback, I am not going to defend the proposed solve to the very last stitch. If you see some value, great. If you see absolutely no value, okay. However, if you are going to throw out everything because of slight interpretation issues, why the hell are we even on here? Really.
I am trying to move this forward in the hopes that someone, yourself included, might gain something. Maybe it's there in Hampton Park. Maybe it's 20 feet to the right of where I picked. I'm not 100% sure, but I can tell you this, if given a choice of parks, this is the one I would pick.
Macfos
2018-03-06 22:42:00
I too am baffled by the lack of exact markings of imagery in Charleston based on the solves for Chicago and Cleveland. We have to be missing something visually accurate or this solve has more to do with verse than imagery.
I continue to scour the parks, looking for imagery matches.
Thanjs fir posting gMan. Gotta run every possibility down. I do agree with Seabass on the protection of sites in Charleston. Always been well protected.
Regards,
Mac
gManTexas
2018-03-06 22:49:00
Macfos wrote::
I too am baffled by the lack of exact markings of imagery in Charleston based on the solves for Chicago and Cleveland. We have to be missing something visually accurate or this solve has more to do with verse than imagery.
I continue to scour the parks, looking for imagery matches.
Thanjs fir posting gMan. Gotta run every possibility down. I do agree with Seabass on the protection of sites in Charleston. Always been well protected.
Regards,
Mac Hey Mac, that's what I'm referring to when I pick Hampton Park. Most of the other candidate sites are either Federal or Historical Preservation protected. From what I understand, Hampton Park is public and you could, possibly with permission, dig there.
Macfos
2018-03-06 23:15:00
gMan... I agree with your process. Right or wrong.
Hampton Park is a city park and there is a no dig/metal detect sign 10 feet from your dig spot.
Either way, working through theories as you do is the way to solve. I am open to everything.
The hunt continues...
Regards,
Mac
Macfos
2018-03-06 23:18:00
BTW - I have other theories (plural), but will not rule out Hampton Park. A lot of connection, but I am stuck on the lack of visual markers with most theories.
My tunnel vision though...
Regards,
Mac
gManTexas
2018-03-06 23:21:00
Macfos wrote::
BTW - I have other theories (plural), but will not rule out Hampton Park. A lot of connection, but I am stuck on the lack of visual markers with most theories.
My tunnel vision though...
Regards,
Mac Everything is fair game. I just have my one option. I do think it needs to be a non-Federal site though.
phinetic
2018-03-06 23:36:00
The zoo is a great idea in the park. I’ve always thought that her wings resembled peacocks. Peacocks might have been there?
Macfos
2018-03-06 23:37:00
gMan.. totally agree.
Regards,
Mac
gManTexas
2018-03-06 23:52:00
phinetic wrote::
The zoo is a great idea in the park. I’ve always thought that her wings resembled peacocks. Peacocks might have been there? I didn't come across a specific inventory of animals. Info on the zoo is hard to come by.
Here is one article:
https://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/cha ... id=4569740
It interesting that Kevin Eberle, the author of a history of the park, says everyone remembers the zoo. That shows the importance of the zoo and possibly a bunch of the imagery we are seeing. Yes, there's an arc to Africa, but the lion, as sad as he may have been, was important. I wonder if someone digging in the city records can find photos of the lion. Maybe the markings match up.
Within the two aviaries, peacocks may have lived there. The zoo was kinda organic, people just dropped off animals there.
The zoo is one of the connections I made to Hampton Park. I don't think we'd see any of those animals in any other area of Charleston, except the preserve, which came later I believe. I think some of the animals from Hampton Park were moved to the wildlife park in the 1970s.
drunknerds
2018-03-06 23:59:00
Yes, the lack of visuals is driving me crazy, and I like to think it's driving the other severely-literal puzzle solvers daffy, too.
Gman, the wings matchup is intriguing. I forget, did you research that the paths were like that in 1980?
gManTexas
2018-03-07 00:08:00
drunknerds wrote::
Yes, the lack of visuals is driving me crazy, and I like to think it's driving the other severely-literal puzzle solvers daffy, too.
Gman, the wings matchup is intriguing. I forget, did you research that the paths were like that in 1980? I tried. They seem to be laid out that way, but I'm hoping someone can find photos.
phinetic
2018-03-07 01:48:00
gManTexas wrote::
Within the two aviaries, peacocks may have lived there. The zoo was kinda organic, people just dropped off animals there. Wow.... like maybe how the slaves were dropped off @ SI ?!!
JamesV
2018-03-07 01:58:00
MaltedFalcon's comments made me sit down and re-think my work for a while, but I still feel like the I2/V5 clues lead me to Fort Moultrie / 12 "paces" from the USS Patapsco obelisk. It's a great point though: As NPS also pointed out to me last summer, BP would definitely have been breaking the law if he buried a casque on the grounds here in 1981-2. Any prizes, awards, etc. would then be forfeited to the NPS, etc. etc. etc. Unfortunately, now I'm left with more questions than answers:
-Was the Charleston casque even buried at all?
Could it have been left in the custody of the park Superintendent, or some similar arrangement? V5 was the only Verse which mentions getting permission before digging--- even in the rules at the end of the book, there's not a whole lot of concern shown for property rights. Also, the way that "Get permission / To dig out" is written struck me as more of an order, rather than a suggestion or advice. Follow the rules, and eventually you'd collect the prize. Conduct an illegal dig, and you'd earn a completely different prize. I floated this idea to Erexere via PM last year, but today I got off my butt and started looking into interviewing both park Superintendents from 1981-1982. Both of the Superintendents from this time appear to still be living, and it looks like they may still be local to Charleston, so I'll keep the group posted if that thought leads anywhere.
-If BP actually did bury the casque illegally, he had to have known that his readers would have difficulty with dig permissions.
Was this the reason for accepting mail-in solutions for inaccessible casques?
Remember in Chicago, he basically told the searchers that their location was correct, then he still sent them back out anyway to conduct a dig...
Last, just wanted an excuse to share this cool aerial shot of Fort Moultrie from August 1979. Other than the changes in trees and shrubs, it looks like this area is basically unchanged. So, if the casque actually was buried outside the sallyport like I suspect, it's probably still there?
Keep searching!
drunknerds
2018-03-07 02:02:00
JamesV wrote::
-Was the Charleston casque even buried at all?
Could it have been left in the custody of the park Superintendent, or some similar arrangement? V5 was the only Verse which mentions getting permission before digging--- even in the rules at the end of the book, there's not a whole lot of concern shown for property rights. Also, the way that "Get permission / To dig out" is written struck me as more of an order, rather than a suggestion or advice. Follow the rules, and eventually you'd collect the prize. Conduct an illegal dig, and you'd earn a completely different prize. I floated this idea to Erexere via PM last year, but today I got off my butt and started looking into interviewing both park Superintendents from 1981-1982. Both of the Superintendents from this time appear to still be living, and it looks like they may still be local to Charleston, so I'll keep the group posted if that thought leads anywhere.
-If BP actually did bury the casque illegally, he had to have known that his readers would have difficulty with dig permissions.
Was this the reason for accepting mail-in solutions for inaccessible casques? I like to think I'm a big skeptic, but this kinda blew my mind. Even if it isn't true, thanks for the mental food, JamesV!
phinetic
2018-03-07 02:20:00
Wow so you wonder if maybe charleston fits that interpretation pretty well. You just wonder if "get permission to dig out" would be lost through employees? How would you know you could trust someone for years and years?
drunknerds
2018-03-07 02:26:00
phinetic wrote::
Wow so you wonder if maybe charleston fits that interpretation pretty well. You just wonder if "get permission to dig out" would be lost through employees? How would you know you could trust someone for years and years? Good question!
Preiss has said he thought every cask would be dug up in 6 months
Maybe salesmanship. But on face value, it checks out
davinci4
2018-03-07 02:33:00
JamesV, I completely agree with your solution on this one. The only edit I would make would be WhiteRabbit’s interpretation of the “wingless bird” as a reference to the Edgar Allen Poe story (doesn’t change the location though). One question I had was regarding the tree that was out front in the 80s. Do we know what type it was? Would have been really amazing if it was a pear tree. Also, consider the ‘white stone’ marker could also be the Osceola tablet.
Great solution. I enjoyed reading it.
graceandhayes
2018-03-07 02:44:00
Wanted to comment on one thing that caught my eye in the 1979 photo. The triangular sidewalk in front of the parking spaces near the visitors center is the closest match I have seen to the jagged teeth on the Ft Sumter mask. The mask has 6 points and the sidewalk only has four, but closest match I have seen yet. The sidewalk is straight today.
graceandhayes
2018-03-07 02:51:00
Also notice a battery that is not there today. At the top center of the photo there is a battery close to the beach with three square openings in the back. This battery has been removed and does not exist today. I wonder what it looks like from the beach side.
phinetic
2018-03-07 03:53:00
Holy @#$% Guys.
No way I can keep this to myself.
First, thanks to JamesV for forcing me to search more of these aerial pictures.
https://imgur.com/a/JBnnX
Closer ....
https://imgur.com/a/1syxI
Look at this. The triangles on the sides of the battery, the STEPS on the sides. This is the fucking triangles with teeth within the "fort" shape!!!! Look above at JamesVs pic for another perspective.
This battery is long gone. But who knows whats still out there.
Anyone got any more pictures?
It has to be there!!! Would have been perfect for him to burry it out there!!! Behind the battery wall, nobody would see him, totally out of view! Near the water. Listening to the birds (or perhaps cannons, or maybe he did infact mean actual birds since its under a tree?!)
Also, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but that path.... if you zoom out....
1. the path that is front of Fort Moultaire, points in a 4 o clock position. (doesn't it even look like the its in the shape of the skirt?)
2. the girls skirt points to a 4 o clock position
3. the staff or pole in the middle of the fort is in the 4 o clock position
If I could put my money on it its that tree to the left of the battery, looking out towards the 4 o clock position. If you look super close in the bigger picture there is friggin SAND PATH that leads out to the beach. If that palm had a four o clock shadow that covered that sand path.....
#@$@#%%@#%!!!!
Someone please tell me I'm wrong and that I'm crazy now.
phinetic
2018-03-07 13:51:00
Zoom in on JamesV picture of the battery. Triangles on both sides. It looks as if it’s distant from Fort Moultaire so perhaps it’s not on federal land and it’s closer to the coast. There are only a handful of palm trees in the area. This would also sort of go along with the sunglasses on the right hand side of the painting, towards a beach.
gManTexas
2018-03-07 14:01:00
phinetic wrote::
Zoom in on JamesV picture of the battery. Triangles on both sides. It looks as if it’s distant from Fort Moultaire so perhaps it’s not on federal land and it’s closer to the coast. There are only a handful of palm trees in the area. This would also sort of go along with the sunglasses on the right hand side of the painting, towards a beach. phinetic, there's no reason to believe that some of these objects could be design elements that were incorporated into Image 2, but you have to be able to walk through the whole image and verse, or at least mostly to determine the casque location. Also, in looking at all of the puzzles and locations (including proposed) none of them fall on Federal lands. They all appear to be public land, which makes a ton of sense since BP expected people to be searching for these casques.
Also, even though after the fact BP had some bravado about burying these things, I highly doubt he would have risked getting arrested, especially on a federal charge.
phinetic
2018-03-07 14:21:00
Found alternative pictures:
https://imgur.com/a/sbtnX
Apologize that i had to upload on my phone.
If you look from the back it looks like the image of the teeth (white/dark) . I think Moultaire is in similar shape to Fort Sumpter. I think the verse tells us between two arms extended (cannons) below the bar (perhaps a sand bar) under the palm (literal tree) in the sand (on the coastal area) is where it could be located. The cannons in the ferry’s wings could make sense.
This is not at Fort Moultaire, but maybe perhaps on the coast of Moultaire.
gManTexas
2018-03-07 14:29:00
MrSeabass wrote::
'Hey Mr. minimum-wage park attendant, can you put this box that has a diamond(?) in it that might be undiscovered for many years somewhere in your office? I completely trust you to maintain this and tell others to keep it in case this treasure hunt goes on for decades. Also make sure you never movie it to somewhere else even though I will never be back to check on it. Oh also you aren't getting paid or anything for holding on to my stuff.''
I really don't need to explain what the issue is here, right? BP made it very clear that all casques were buried. I was joking with another member that if you go to the Brooklyn library and talk to the rare collections people and utter the code phrase, "The eagle headed gull flies by the Russian lady of liberty at 11:00." They will hand you a map and gold plated shovel.
Smokey Joe Would
2018-03-07 14:48:00
graceandhayes wrote::
Wanted to comment on one thing that caught my eye in the 1979 photo. The triangular sidewalk in front of the parking spaces near the visitors center is the closest match I have seen to the jagged teeth on the Ft Sumter mask. The mask has 6 points and the sidewalk only has four, but closest match I have seen yet. The sidewalk is straight today. Add in the windows at the church across the street and you have the top and the bottom of the jagged teeth.
Macfos
2018-03-07 17:37:00
Would it be helpful to start a thread called "Brute Force Attack: Image2" and list all of the parks in Charleston and then bust each one as a team, eliminating 1 by 1?
I am on the ground in Charleston and can provide pictures and on ground assessments as we work through locations.
Searching for buried fairy treasure is fun... lol even my wife likes it because she gets to pick the place to eat everytime I drag her on a fairy mission.
Regards,
Mac
Macfos
2018-03-07 17:46:00
So is it a good idea overall? I do want honest opinions. Maybe just do something like that under this thread?
Thoughts?
Regards,
Mac
Macfos
2018-03-07 17:54:00
I see your reservation and you are probably right.
Any thought of picking a single park and trying to confirm visuals? Just trying to think of a team approach where we could layout everything about a specif location and get a bunch of input instead of jumping all over the map with different thoughts and theories.
Thanks for the feedback MrSeabass.
Regards,
Mac
gManTexas
2018-03-07 19:20:00
MrSeabass wrote::
Ehhhhhh not really. Way too much area to cover, and it will inevitably lead to a massive amount of bad reverse confirmations, i.e. pick a park and then find any vague link back to the image or verse. We'll end up with 17 different parks that turn into a pissing contest. Seems that's where it sits now.
gManTexas
2018-03-07 19:22:00
Macfos wrote::
I see your reservation and you are probably right.
Any thought of picking a single park and trying to confirm visuals? Just trying to think of a team approach where we could layout everything about a specif location and get a bunch of input instead of jumping all over the map with different thoughts and theories.
Thanks for the feedback MrSeabass.
Regards,
Mac Sounds productive. Get all the eyes on one location and exhaust the possibilities.
Macfos
2018-03-07 19:24:00
gMan... that is exactly what I was thinking. Process of elimination via brute force attack 1 park at a time.
Regards,
Mac
gManTexas
2018-03-07 19:32:00
Macfos wrote::
gMan... that is exactly what I was thinking. Process of elimination via brute force attack 1 park at a time.
Regards,
Mac Pick a park to nominate. "Park of the Month" club. Then we attack.
Macfos
2018-03-07 19:42:00
"Then we attack."
LOVE IT...
Regards,
Mac
gManTexas
2018-03-07 19:45:00
Macfos wrote::
"Then we attack."
LOVE IT...
Regards,
Mac As long as none of those gun batteries are still operational.
You got any other boots on the ground? I say go in with multiple people and create a diversion while someone probes. Like bring one of these
drunknerds
2018-03-07 21:18:00
Yeah, just name a spot and I'll get at it (from my armchair)
JamesV
2018-03-07 21:38:00
davinci4 wrote::
One question I had was regarding the tree that was out front in the 80s. Do we know what type it was? Would have been really amazing if it was a pear tree. I enjoyed reading it. @DaVinci4- to be fully honest, I'd never even considered that it *might* have been a pear tree. I've got tons of photos of it, though. Best I can tell, it stood there until the late 80s or so, and it probably came down when Hurricane Hugo hit in 1989. I suspect it may have been some variety of cypress, but it definitely had leaves instead of needles. So, not an exact match with the branch in Image 2.
There was also two taller trees located in the corner of the NW bastion. These were both definitely cypress, but judging by the old photos I looked at they were removed sometime in the mid-1970s. So unless BP visited Fort Moultrie several years before he claimed to, those two trees don't seem to factor in.
JamesV
2018-03-07 21:51:00
MrSeabass wrote::
'Hey Mr. minimum-wage park attendant, can you put this box that has a diamond(?) in it that might be undiscovered for many years somewhere in your office? I completely trust you to maintain this and tell others to keep it in case this treasure hunt goes on for decades. Also make sure you never movie it to somewhere else even though I will never be back to check on it. Oh also you aren't getting paid or anything for holding on to my stuff.'' So you're saying there's a chance?
Seriously, I appreciate the reality check. I doubt we'll ever find out the full story, but it's also possible that BP buried the casque here as in every other city, then had an "Oh Shoot" moment after meeting with his legal team and decided to tack on that line about getting permission. Who knows...
Important to note, though, that Sumter is basically just the old fort itself, while the administrative HQ for Fort Sumter National Monument is actually located out at Fort Moultrie. I did have a chance to take the Sumter tour when I was home last year, and could not find any Image/Verse matches out on the island proper. Also, the retired park Superintendents both have pretty impressive bios-- more like history professors, rather than summer interns. It might be possible for them to have played along somehow, although I really doubt they'd have given BP explicit permission to bury a casque here.
phinetic
2018-03-08 01:52:00
I think its really important to figure out what the teeth represent, the flag(?), star, and what the eyes represent.
For whatever reason I've been really trying to figure the eyes out, both on the mask, the flat head screwdriver eyes on the fort sumter, and also the lion. I've always wondered why the bright lines under the eyes on the lion.
gManTexas
2018-03-08 03:10:00
phinetic wrote::
I think its really important to figure out what the teeth represent, the flag(?), star, and what the eyes represent.
For whatever reason I've been really trying to figure the eyes out, both on the mask, the flat head screwdriver eyes on the fort sumter, and also the lion. I've always wondered why the bright lines under the eyes on the lion. I did a ton of searching but could not find a match in the collections of the Charleston Museums, but that's not to say it doesn't exist. Or that Preiss and JJP maybe used a different source. Have a look at this mask from Congo. One of the countries where many of the slaves were taken.
https://www.rrtraders.com/Masks/chokwesd.htm
It could also be an interpretation of a Chilkat traditional blanket.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilkat_weaving
During the 1901 Inter-States and West Indies Exposition, there was an "Eskimo" village included. Some of the peoples may have been from this region. Ironically in 2007 a blanket of this type turned up in Charleston on Antiques Roadshow. The guy that had it appraised said it had been in his family for a while. It is entirely possible that it was from the Expo of 1901.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/roadshow/season ... 201506A14/
Alternately, it could be design elements from in and around Charleston. Sometimes it is difficult to pinpoint the inspirations for these Images. The important thing is to walk through the entire Verse and Image and make as many possible connections that you can.
Macfos
2018-03-08 03:41:00
I will be photographing multiple items at a park this weekend and will upload for interpretation.
Every detail documented for 1 park for disection by the group.
You guys have great intelltec into these puzzles. My mind does not work that way so all I can do is provide on the ground info and an occassional "ah ha" moment... if that ... lol.
Regards,
Mac
phinetic
2018-03-08 04:08:00
WPG. It has to be.
1. The argument for WPG is that there is a daisy (think flower, garden) and there is also white on the tip of the nose on sumter (or AKA a White Point). Bringing it together, White Point Gardens. The flower can also be similar to the shape of a palm tree, which is in the verse.
2. We come to the USS Maine capstan (which has
May 1913 on it
, from the verse).
3. The lion has a massive mane (or should I say Maine) in the photo. The lions mane is so exaggerated in this photo you instantly notice it.
4. I almost see the ferry as a ships decorative african figurehead which further illustrates ships (also notice the trail of blue, or water, underneath her in the painting).
https://imgur.com/a/oSNOT
(Even look at her wrists!)
5. Someone has even posted about the lions birthmark looking like the the Havana Port in Cuba, which is where the USS Maine originally sank.
https://imgur.com/a/bPhY0
I think we can either argue this is just coincidence, or that there is some merrit.
Between two arms extended ------> Cannon
Below the bar that binds -----------> Bar (n) 1) A shoal usually composed of sand or sediment transported by currents causing an obstruction to navigation, usually a shoal lying just offshore the entrance to a harbour
Beside the long palm's shadow ----------> There are two palm trees next to what was the USS Capstan
Embedded in the sand ----------> Embedded in the path
Waits the Fair remuneration -----------> treasure
White house close at hand. -------------> This could mean either be ON the side of the white house of S battery road or just simply mean its near by.
phinetic
2018-03-08 13:34:00
I guess it just depends if you’re following the branch outwards or are you following it inwards. What did Byron want us to do?
I also think that all the other clues narrow it down. The map in the image is a clue, but doesn’t at all narrow it down to a specific locations. I think the map says Charleston, and the clues say WPG.
I guess as far as the birthmark goes, I definitely see a similarity. It might not be perfect, but it’s rather convincing if your already leaning on the USS Maine, it’s an excellent added clue.
Macfos
2018-03-08 14:04:00
Unknown:
phinetic said:
I guess as far as the birthmark goes, I definitely see a similarity. It might not be perfect, but it’s rather convincing if your already leaning on the USS Maine, it’s an excellent added clue. That would be called shoehorning...
Regards,
Mac
drunknerds
2018-03-08 15:06:00
phinetic wrote::
I guess it just depends if you’re following the branch outwards or are you following it inwards. What did Byron want us to do?
I also think that all the other clues narrow it down. The map in the image is a clue, but doesn’t at all narrow it down to a specific locations. I think the map says Charleston, and the clues say WPG.
I guess as far as the birthmark goes, I definitely see a similarity. It might not be perfect, but it’s rather convincing if your already leaning on the USS Maine, it’s an excellent added clue. Check back a few pages, I posted a side by side comparison of the two
Edit: bottom of page 58
drunknerds
2018-03-08 15:14:00
Macfos wrote::
I will be photographing multiple items at a park this weekend and will upload for interpretation.
Every detail documented for 1 park for disection by the group.
You guys have great intelltec into these puzzles. My mind does not work that way so all I can do is provide on the ground info and an occassional "ah ha" moment... if that ... lol.
Regards,
Mac Tell us which park, dude, so we can research!
phinetic
2018-03-08 15:25:00
I think with comparing maps that Byron would have had vs what we are using, literal satalite images, may play into affect? I'm not sure.
I think strictly speaking, the birthmark on the lion - it must be significant in some way. I think we cna agree on that. The only thing I can think of is that either its an exact outline of something, or its an ambiguous and crudly representation of something else. I would think its the former. It must be an outline of something, and with hwo it looks, it must be geographical. And if that is the case it boggles my mind that nobody has been able to fit to yet if Havannah is vetoed.
Macfos
2018-03-08 18:09:00
I don't know. I was waiting for input from the group on which park everyone wanted to start with.
Let me know before Saturday morning. Going to rain Sunday so we are going early Saturday.
Regards,
Mac
gManTexas
2018-03-08 18:18:00
Macfos wrote::
I don't know. I was waiting for input from the group on which park everyone wanted to start with.
Let me know before Saturday morning. Going to rain Sunday so we are going early Saturday.
Regards,
Mac Since you are there, pick one and the rest of us can research from afar.
Smokey Joe Would
2018-03-08 18:33:00
phinetic wrote::
I think with comparing maps that Byron would have had vs what we are using, literal satalite images, may play into affect? I'm not sure.
I think strictly speaking, the birthmark on the lion - it must be significant in some way. I think we cna agree on that. The only thing I can think of is that either its an exact outline of something, or its an ambiguous and crudly representation of something else. I would think its the former. It must be an outline of something, and with hwo it looks, it must be geographical. And if that is the case it boggles my mind that nobody has been able to fit to yet if Havannah is vetoed. I agree completely. He didn't have Google earth to look at stuff. We have to be a little abstract, the maps he had for reference might have been 50 years old in 1980.
Also we have to get on the ground in these places. We can't just google a place and use street view. So much has changed in 30 some odd years that the A-ha moment might be gone. Every passing day makes it harder to find.
WPG has so many clues that point to it, are those just red herrings, maybe. But why would he do that? Just to make it harder? These are supposed to be hard but not impossible, he expected them to be found within 6 months to a year. I think sometimes we over think them.
gManTexas
2018-03-08 18:51:00
Smokey Joe Would wrote::
I agree completely. He didn't have Google earth to look at stuff. We have to be a little abstract, the maps he had for reference might have been 50 years old in 1980.
Also we have to get on the ground in these places. We can't just google a place and use street view. So much has changed in 30 some odd years that the A-ha moment might be gone. Every passing day makes it harder to find.
WPG has so many clues that point to it, are those just red herrings, maybe. But why would he do that? Just to make it harder? These are supposed to be hard but not impossible, he expected them to be found within 6 months to a year. I think sometimes we over think them. If it was me, I would make the diamond more difficult to find.
drunknerds
2018-03-08 19:12:00
I feel like burying it in a place that's illegal to dig would make it harder than any red herring ever could
maltedfalcon
2018-03-08 19:13:00
drunknerds wrote::
I feel like burying it in a place that's illegal to dig would make it harder than any red herring ever could by that logic he could have just tossed it in the water...
Macfos
2018-03-08 20:50:00
I am going to start up the Peninsula and go to Wragg & Marion Square this weekend. Will take lots of photos of the parks and surroundings and some notes as well.
Regards,
Mac
gManTexas
2018-03-09 02:25:00
Macfos wrote::
I am going to start up the Peninsula and go to Wragg & Marion Square this weekend. Will take lots of photos of the parks and surroundings and some notes as well.
Regards,
Mac Mac,
I did a quick visual scan of the squares. Wragg appears to be very small and somewhat featureless. Marion is much more interesting. Former home of the Citadel if I am correct and the HUGE statue of Calhoun. I'm trying to see features around the park, but not having much luck. Maybe you can get some photos of interesting building near there. I believe everyone wants to see jagged teeth and stuff like that to match the masks in Image 2.
drunknerds
2018-03-09 04:50:00
Get the hornwork in M sq , if you can please. Maybe that forehead blotch is on the stone or something
Minotaur_moreno
2018-03-09 04:59:00
gManTexas
2018-03-09 05:01:00
Minotaur_moreno wrote::
IMHO, anyone that thinks it was in the children's zoo, is just completely wrong. Why does that make me the bad guy? Are you in the correct thread?
drunknerds
2018-03-09 05:02:00
ThEre's a huge stone there that used to be part of a defensive wall that held off the British. The rock extends well underground...
Weight and roots extended
Together saved the site
Of granite walls
Wind swept halls
Citadel in the night
Macfos
2018-03-09 16:13:00
Marion Square and the surrounding it is. Going tomorrow morning. Will photo all statues/monuments/iron work, etc in the park and the surrounding buildings.
Regards,
Mac
drunknerds
2018-03-09 16:29:00
Macfos wrote::
Marion Square and the surrounding it is. Going tomorrow morning. Will photo all statues/monuments/iron work, etc in the park and the surrounding buildings.
Regards,
Mac Thanks. Just to save you some time: Looks like the Marion square main plaque, the plaque by the statue, and the sign explaining the defeat by the British are all clearly posted on GIS>
phinetic
2018-03-11 01:21:00
I still think it’s confusing that there are people still using two different verses to solve this.
maltedfalcon
2018-03-11 02:03:00
phinetic wrote::
I still think it’s confusing that there are people still using two different verses to solve this. I constantly go back and try all the verses on different images to see if there is something I have missed.
drunknerds
2018-03-11 02:14:00
phinetic wrote::
I still think it’s confusing that there are people still using two different verses to solve this. The thing that baffles me is people trying to promote a theory by using a verse, without citing parts that are verbatim on plaques or statues, or using exact matches from a related image. It's short prose, anything can tunnel to anything.
maltedfalcon
2018-03-11 02:54:00
drunknerds wrote::
The thing that baffles me is people trying to promote a theory by using a verse, without citing parts that are verbatim on plaques or statues, or using exact matches from a related image. It's short prose, anything can tunnel to anything. While there are definitly image matches from the casque location, were there verse matches in Cleveland or Chicago that matched plaques or statues?
phinetic
2018-03-11 04:55:00
Ok guys I did some digging to try and atleast solidify Image 2 with Verse 6. I specifically did some digging regarding "Edward and Edwina named after him"
This exact line is in the book "Abroad in America" and links a man by the name of Edward Blyden. Doing some research I found quite a few essays and papers written about Blyden and found some good stuff. One is that he was an educator, politician in Liberia (fitting the African theme). Most of you all know this I think. However I found a really interesting fact reading a dissertation (yes, I read part a dissertation for this) and found this very, very interesting!!
"Sierra Leone, unlike Nigeria or Ghana, began mining mineral resources only in
1929. It was at the time an important producer of
diamonds
and iron. It is important to
note that it was
after the death of Edward Wilmot Blyden in 1912, that mineral mining
began in both Liberia and Sierra Leone.
The reason for this development was that the
colonial powers blockaded the development efforts of the Creoles. They accused the
Creoles (African Americans) of being responsible for poisoning the minds of the natives
against the colonial powers."
"Moreover, the freed black's anticipation that they were going to become rich upon their
emigration to Africa proved false as some of them lived in poverty. Others who
established their own companies obtained reasonable economic gains, but when they
were confronted by the Colonial powers' blockade they began to experience serious
economic challenges. Creoles no longer had privileged position in village commerce;
they were gradually moved to Freetown and its suburbs from the villages where they
were first settled on arrival from the United States via Nova Scotia and London."
Liberia seems super important, and, yes:
The national animal of Liberia is the Lion
I have proclaimed to have found pretty "big" things in previous posts, but guys, this cannot be a coincidence. Edward, liberia, the lion, and the diamond.
gManTexas
2018-03-11 05:00:00
phinetic wrote::
Ok guys I did some digging to try and atleast solidify Image 2 with Verse 6. I specifically did some digging regarding "Edward and Edwina named after him"
This exact line is in the book "Abroad in America" and links a man by the name of Edward Blyden. Doing some research I found quite a few essays and papers written about Blyden and found some good stuff. One is that he was an educator, politician in Liberia (fitting the African theme). Most of you all know this I think. However I found a really interesting fact reading a dissertation (yes, I read part a dissertation for this) and found this very, very interesting!!
"Sierra Leone, unlike Nigeria or Ghana, began mining mineral resources only in
1929. It was at the time an important producer of
diamonds
and iron. It is important to
note that it was
after the death of Edward Wilmot Blyden in 1912, that mineral mining
began in both Liberia and Sierra Leone.
The reason for this development was that the
colonial powers blockaded the development efforts of the Creoles. They accused the
Creoles (African Americans) of being responsible for poisoning the minds of the natives
against the colonial powers."
I have proclaimed to have found pretty "big" things in previous posts, but guys, this cannot be a coincidence. I think this concludes that Image 2 goes with Verse 6. After his death mining became prevelant for specifically diamonds in Africa. Let me know what you guys think!! Great work! I am a huge advocate for historical research into these puzzles.
erexere
2018-03-11 05:22:00
Some solid research on Blyden, and though I support looking deeper, because Preiss would've had his reasons, I think it's not completely necessary to know the background of the obscure quotes.
I think what needs to be addressed is the unisex name situation. Edwin and Edwina can both be referred to as Ed or Eddy/Eddie. I just realized that the word "eddy" is also used to describe a circular current like a whirlpool or vortex.
phinetic
2018-03-11 05:50:00
I forgot to mention something else I noticed. I made a post about things I noticed in the previous solved casques and noticed in each of them the state was outlined and think that if you rotate the picture (which each picture had you do to identify marking / landmarks) you can see the outline of south carolina in the photo.
https://imgur.com/a/OXwIC
It might not be perfect, but niether was the illinois state outline. If anyhting it might atleast allow us to not pay attention to the branches in that particular area?
phinetic
2018-03-11 06:15:00
Hey yall I think my focus here on out is Hampton Park.
1) "During the mid-20th century, the park included a zoo. It was opened in 1932, and an
aviary
was added about six years later.[12] Most of the animals, including a
lion
, were donated to the zoo or bred at the zoo". I think whats important here is that they had a single lion, and they also had an aviary. For what its worth,
I think that in the top two images within the ferrys wings are two birds, maybe even peacocks.
2) The USS Maine was previous at Hampton Park which has been a focus of a lot of peoples searches.
3)
https://imgur.com/a/pvpdM
This image illistrates the face in both the painting and the overhead view of Hampton Park.
4) Hampton Park itself has a lot of history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hampton_Park_(Charleston)#Union_Cemetery
gManTexas
2018-03-11 06:49:00
phinetic wrote::
Hey yall I think my focus here on out is Hampton Park.
1) "During the mid-20th century, the park included a zoo. It was opened in 1932, and an
aviary
was added about six years later.[12] Most of the animals, including a
lion
, were donated to the zoo or bred at the zoo". I think whats important here is that they had a single lion, and they also had an aviary. For what its worth,
I think that in the top two images within the ferrys wings are two birds, maybe even peacocks.
2) The USS Maine was previous at Hampton Park which has been a focus of a lot of peoples searches.
3)
https://imgur.com/a/pvpdM
This image illistrates the face in both the painting and the overhead view of Hampton Park.
4) Hampton Park itself has a lot of history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hampton_Park_(Charleston)#Union_Cemetery You are hot on my trail. I posted a potential solve a few pages back. Link to PDF is in there.
phinetic
2018-03-11 16:21:00
Seabass -
Let me tell you why I think you're wrong, just like youre telling me why I'm wrong.
1) In both casques that were found the state was outlined in the painting. Yes, I understand there is a map of Cahrleston is in the picture, my point is that Byron used outlines in the previous two images. The purpose to acknowledge that this is an outline of SC atleast allows us to possibly look away from the branches and trying to make any sense of them and waste time looking for something. I dont know why you dont think this could be the outline. Here is a imagine from another painting:
https://imgur.com/a/ga5g5
Not perfect, but its there. I dont think anyone can say for sure whether it is or not an outline.
2) You posted a picture from Hampton Park in 1971, which is way, way too early. If you look at aerial picture in 1989 (
https://imgur.com/a/T4KwZ
), you can clearly see a similar outline and image as it is today. Unless you know for a fact what the detail was when Byron burried the casques in the early 80s I'll take your dismissiveness which a large grain of salt.
gManTexas
2018-03-11 17:35:00
Even if we found an outline of South Carolina, or the other states in the other Images, what does this buy us? Getting back to Charleston, there is a very prominent map on the skull. What more do we need?
erexere
2018-03-11 18:31:00
gManTexas wrote::
Even if we found an outline of South Carolina, or the other states in the other Images, what does this buy us? Getting back to Charleston, there is a very prominent map on the skull. What more do we need? And some interesting lat/log numbers, right?
maltedfalcon
2018-03-11 23:48:00
MrSeabass wrote::
Notice how there's no image of California in the San Francisco image. Notice how there's no image of Texas in the Houston solve. the map of California is under her right arm, above the table.
the map of the texas coast (where houston is) is behind the djinn fountain.
thedell
2018-03-12 01:45:00
are there any statues in hampton park?
phinetic
2018-03-12 02:51:00
maltedfalcon wrote::
the map of California is under her right arm, above the table.
the map of the texas coast (where houston is) is behind the djinn fountain. See, this is great to know!!! Thank you maltedfalcon. The whole point is that we obviously know it may be in Charleston, but I think what this does is that if we can find the state outline within the painting, we can say that the branches in that particular area illustrate the state outline and we can focus on other areas of the painting to solve the puzzle! That was my whole point. If we can focus and maybe solve what you think is irrelevant or insignifcant areas of the painting and we may narrow down the important details.
You guys are so "who cares we know its in South Carolina already" but I think its important to solve each section of the painting so that if we know a certain section means something, we can focus more on other areas and not spend 5 hours figuring out what a certain area means when it might just be a simple state outline!
Macfos
2018-03-12 15:32:00
Here are the photos of Marion Square. I took photos of everything I could in the park. They were setting up huge tents for something and had some sections fenced off. I think I got most of it. I also took photos of surrounding buildings, signs, markers, etc. May jog someone's memory and maybe lead to a clue or maybe nothing. Either way, enjoyed being downtown this weekend and having lunch with my wife.
https://imgur.com/a/r67av
Regards,
Mac
gManTexas
2018-03-12 15:57:00
Macfos wrote::
Here are the photos of Marion Square. I took photos of everything I could in the park. They were setting up huge tents for something and had some sections fenced off. I think I got most of it. I also took photos of surrounding buildings, signs, markers, etc. May jog someone's memory and maybe lead to a clue or maybe nothing. Either way, enjoyed being downtown this weekend and having lunch with my wife.
https://imgur.com/a/r67av
Regards,
Mac Thanks for these Mac. Did you notice anything that would reference:
Or on the eighth a scene
Where law defended
drunknerds
2018-03-12 16:31:00
Thanks.
That fountain is a hexagon. Any idea what the phrases written around it are?
Macfos
2018-03-12 16:34:00
I noticed the writing on the benches of that fountain after looking at the pictures. I didn't even notice that when down there. I will try to get pictures next time I go downtown. Hopefully next weekend.
Also, nothing on 8th where law defended, but I have not put much time in Marion Square. Grabbed the photos, went to lunch and then had to get back home.
Regards,
Mac
JamesV
2018-03-12 23:43:00
drunknerds wrote::
That fountain is a hexagon. Any idea what the phrases written around it are? It's been a few years, but I believe the pentagon is engraved on the sides with the Rotary Club's "Four-Way Test":
Is it the truth?
Is it fair to all concerned?
Will it build goodwill and better friendships?
Will it be beneficial to all concerned?
The fifth side also mentions how the Rotary Club gifted the fountain to the city of Charleston.
thedell
2018-03-13 01:51:00
I search this forum for statues and did see anyone talking about it, I could be wrong about that.
anyone else see the fairy wing on the left side the page that looks like a statue of mary holding a leaf?
gManTexas
2018-03-19 05:05:00
Let's reel this in a bit. There is clearly animal imagery in Image 2. We have a huge lion, a primate, and what appears to be birds. Where in Charleston do we or did we have these animals?
Or do people think this is just a reference to Africa in general?
MrBackstop
2018-04-04 19:43:00
gManTexas wrote::
Let's reel this in a bit. There is clearly animal imagery in Image 2. We have a huge lion, a primate, and what appears to be birds. Where in Charleston do we or did we have these animals?
Or do people think this is just a reference to Africa in general? I think Lion may have two meanings, one to signify Africa and the other to possible signify a person or that person's persona. I see the the mask as also being representative of the slave trade, not necessarily a primate. I've seen a few people talk about birds but I see them more as a cobblestone design worked into the fairy's wings. I've had the pleasure of visiting Charleston many times and these cobblestone streets seem to pop up everywhere when you're downtown.
anus905
2018-04-04 19:57:00
the lion is representative of e Africa and the door knocker on 50 East Bay St....I already released the full solution for this...
the birds are the birds that nest above the bandstand in april (see my youtube video)...they are large and loud waterbirds.
gajojo
2018-04-07 21:03:00
[quote="
the birds are the birds that nest above the bandstand in april (see my youtube video)...they are large and loud waterbirds.
anus905
2018-04-08 00:11:00
yea the last videos are shit though, it got dark out.
where did i end at, corner of E Battery?
from there, youd walk down E Battery; along Rainbow Row; till you get to 50 E Bay St.
there you find the star (white star, tells you its a building and relates to white building in verse) and lion door knocker.
on way (at end of E Battery Wall) you find monument to first black naval commander, some haitian dude.
if i recall correctly, next clue is the edwin/edwina clue, which takes you to the Jasper monument. the connection here is that both have things named after them; mainly ships in the case of Jasper, in relation to this puzzle.
on eighth a scene...takes you to the pirate monument at NE corner of WPG...which is a ruse. the fact that the eighth is a ref to this monument is reinforced by the earlier clue about Harken to the words of a patriot, 1840". its a ruse, bc if you didnt break the purely visual pendant clues, you will think the white house is the saussere house, the palms are the palms around it, and your focus is on the E Battery wall; instead of the S Battery wall. a similar ruse is employed in the NYC puzzle.
where law defended relates back to the first (treasure island) clue; in that it reinforces the idea that pirates were killed and buried in the park...so this is reinforcing the idea that we do NOT dig in WPG...if we didnt already figure that out in the beginning.
bw 2 arms extended...wed think this relates to 2 cannons if we fell for the ruse; but we know this is a reference to the arm of the sundial (shadow) at 4pm; and cannon across from the Fort Sumter Association Building.
the sundial is a monument commemorating a naval disaster that occurred in april (in which the ships went down in 4 minutes). the monument was also dedicated in april, as well.
the cannon and sundial are offset.
so we stand bw them on an angle; facing the FSAB; looking West down S Battery.
below the bar that binds...is a literary reference from "the history of kinyaro bitara" (#19 in the East African Studies Collection).
the quote it takes us to tells us its the "bar that binds water".
so we know that the treasure is UNDER the protection of one of the battery walls.
wed think this refers to the E Battery wall if we fell for the ruse; but it refers to the S Battery wall.
this is reinforced by a plaque discussing the creation of the battery walls, west down s battery from wpg.
beside the long palm's shadow...tells us the location of the treasure will be marked by the shadow of a palm tree at 4pm.
so, we can deduce that it is one of 4 palms; based on the framing of the cannon and sundial.
embedded in sand...tells us the casque will be buried in sand.
so, we can eliminate 3 of the palms...one has its shadow in WPG; one has its shadow in the street; one has its shadow fall in a garden outside the FSAB, but this garden is dirt, not sand.
so, by now we know that the treasure is under the protection of the S Battery wall; bw the 2 arms (cannon/sundial) extended; beside the shadow of our designated palm tree at 4pm; near to the white house (the FSAB).
thus, the treasure is located in the triangle sandbox on the S side of the FSAB; W outside of WPG, along S Battery; right behind the stairs.
you can see the triangle sandbox in the painting under the faery's arms.
anus905
2018-04-08 00:25:00
fyi when i refer to S Battery as a St...i meant Murray...my bad.
heres where the treasure was...
when i got there there was no little palm; coconut fibres were replaced with rocks. only half the garden bw shadow and building was sand. at 4pm shadow falls to back corner of stairs against building. leaving you about half of it.
https://www.google.ca/maps/@32.7695555, ... 312!8i6656
phinetic
2018-04-08 02:36:00
but the traingles dont match, at all. The actual triangle box in the south wall points west and the one in the image points east.
phinetic
2018-04-08 02:51:00
Honestly I think that its not in Charelston but rather Sullivans Island or Mt PLeasant. Having the bridge from charelston and down coleman road as the branch is too specific to just have us go back to white point garden. It has to be telling us to go towards mount pleasant direction. Also most people see 'sunglasses' on the far right side but I possibly see a mountain, further points to mt pleasant, not to mention that this is where most of the slaves came in.
drunknerds
2018-04-08 03:05:00
phinetic wrote::
Honestly I think that its not in Charelston but rather Sullivans Island or Mt PLeasant. Having the bridge from charelston and down coleman road as the branch is too specific to just have us go back to white point garden. It has to be telling us to go towards mount pleasant direction. Also most people see 'sunglasses' on the far right side but I possibly see a mountain, further points to mt pleasant, not to mention that this is where most of the slaves came in. I like your ideas, they echo a lot of the sentiment about, "hey let's just explore other avenues because the wpg has key stuff but mayyyy still just be coincidence, because other than the lion's nose there's literally no on-site image matches"
Show me some image matches and I'll gladly subscribe to your newsletter.
phinetic
2018-04-08 04:07:00
Here you go:
I 've been messing around with the photo on photoshop and found some interesting things. One is that I found 3 perfect circles in the image in different colors and decided to connect them, and they formed a perfect triangle within the image.
https://imgur.com/a/hBOs9
. I thought to myself "is this helping me narrow down where to look for the casque if I overlay Image 2 with a map of coleman road, and I didnt find anything...EXCEPT!!!
There is a cross in the lions mane above the beginning of colemans road and found a very, very interesting cemetary almost exactly where the cross lays. From wiki:
"Remley Point Cemetery is cemetery located in the Scanlonville community in Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina. It contains 41 marked graves ranging from 1867 to 1989, but residents claim there may be over 1,000 people, largely African American, buried there.[2]"
Additionally, check out an image from the cemetary, it is very, very unique indeed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remley_Point_Cemetery#/media/File:Remley_Point_Cemetery_2.jpg
By the way, Scanlonville, which is the area that is in this triangle,
https://imgur.com/a/kYCaR
also has an interesting history:
"Scanlonville is a hidden and quiet marsh-front community located on the corner of Seventh Avenue and Mathis Ferry Road just past Fire Department #3. Established after the Civil War, this African-American community enjoys a rich heritage spanning over 100 years. After the war, many former slaves began to establish their own farms and businesses. The development of Scanlonville is one such enterprise. In 1868, freedman-carpenter Robert Scanlon purchased the 614-acre Remley’s Plantation that was bordered by the Charleston Harbor and the Wando River. The property was previously owned by Paul Remley who died in 1863. Scanlon founded the Charleston Land Company and 100 African-American men paid $10 per share to purchase large tracts of land. The land was divided into two-acre farm lots and half-acre town lots. By 1870, former slaves who desired to own land could purchase town or farm lots. The Charleston Land Company and the development of Scanlonville is one of four known cooperative ventures between African-American freedmen."
In summary I think the cross in the image represents this cemetary which is directly north of the beignning of colemand road and the cross and the actual cemetary are almost identical in their locations when you transpose both images on one another. I don't know if this helps us at all but I think that these weird circles in the image cannot be ignored. They are diffenetly purposful and I think we need to really look at this image in different ways, we should even rotate it, even look at it upsideodwn. Hell, the 79 is written upsidedown, why not analyze it from that angle too!
There are too many clues pointing out towards Mt Pleasant (maybe there maybe beyond there), but it seems
SO RIDICULOUS
to have a literal map of Charleston in the image, have a reference going out towards Mount pleasant (the bridge/tree) to only have a reference go back towards Charelston towards white point gardens. What on earth would be the point of the bridge reference if it didn't lead you out there. You see the image of Charlelston, you get the reference of the bridge, it leads you out thay way, not back!!!!!
This idea just brushes the surface of what I got right now and what I've been working on, but honestly a lot of you guys are being so snobish I dont think I'll be sharing anything else anymore on here. You guys sure do know how to push people down and shut down any idea that doesnt fit your own theory. Im out.
anus905
2018-04-08 05:12:00
you sure those arent artifacts? try looking at the image in the expedition unknown episode and see if you can spot them.
the one is particularly noticeable.
but i see at least 4. other than the 2 you note there is one in the black space to the left of the lion's ear and another to the right of the cross in the lions mane.
so im not sure which you used.
what does a map of coleman road have to do with anything? what is coleman road? where is it? why coleman? what made you overlay the triangle on or around coleman as opposed to elsewhere? what is the connection to coleman?
anus905
2018-04-08 05:13:00
phinetic wrote::
but the traingles dont match, at all. The actual triangle box in the south wall points west and the one in the image points east. what triangles do you speak of?
anus905
2018-04-08 05:16:00
are you talking about the triangle sandbox? not only is it exactly the shape it is in the painting...nothing says it has to point the same way...how can a sandbox in a painting be pointing in a cardinal direction? its a painting. its there the colour of sand marked by the shadow of the palm tree (her arms are making).
phinetic
2018-04-08 05:18:00
Seriously fam?
The bend in the pine branch near the pear could represent the bend in Route 703 (Coleman Blvd) as it passes through Mt. Pleasant just east of Charleston. To the southwest of this bend is Patriots Point, which is one of two departure points for ferries to Fort Sumter. Prior to its demolition in 2005, the Silas N.
PEAR
MAN BRIDGE
, PEAR!!!! would have connected at the upper left corner of this map, where Route 703 splits in half to form the on-ramp and off-ramp for the bridge. The bridge passed over Drum Island and connected to the Charleston peninsula.
https://imgur.com/a/9Io1L
anus905
2018-04-08 05:37:00
wtf are you talking about? i never mention the branch...the branch takes from charleston to georgetown, with the section on the right kicking you down into the islands in the next inlet up. i always said the pear represented pearman bridge, so im not sure wtf it is youre disputing, exactly...
yes the branch takes you over pearman, past patriots point and through down into dewee's island.
phinetic
2018-04-08 05:41:00
So why do you think its in some area to the south of Fort Sumpters House if all these clues lead out from Charelston towards Mt. Pleasant?
anus905
2018-04-08 05:43:00
what does any of that have to do with the triangle sandbox? or any triangles whatsoever for that matter?
anus905
2018-04-08 05:44:00
are you on crack? how do all the clues lead you out of charleston to mount pleasant? you are doing it backwards. you start in mount pleasant and make your way into charleston bro...you literally have to ignore 85% of clues to make that statement...
anus905
2018-04-08 05:46:00
also, there is the greater puzzle and the treasure hunt...if you follow the treasure hunt clues, you get to the location i have posted. without question lol.
anus905
2018-04-08 05:56:00
fyi the reason you start across the river is because you would need to start there in order to take the ferry over to Fort Sumter (from Patriot's Point); and you need to go to Fort Moultrie before that.
anus905
2018-04-08 06:02:00
one more thing...even by your own logic...wouldnt the cross be on the charleston side? lol
phinetic
2018-04-08 06:04:00
lol bro theres a map of Charleston. Its in the picture. Anyone can get that reference. Theres no reason to have a reference to pearman bridge if it didnt go that way. You're telling me most people would see the pearman bridge reference and then notice the map of charelston? Answer me this, which one is it:
1) You notice the map of Charleston, and then notice the pearman bridge reference leading you to mount pleasant
2) You notice pearman bridge, and then notice the map of charelston and think its leading you to charelston
What is the purpose?
phinetic
2018-04-08 06:06:00
anus905 wrote::
one more thing...even by your own logic...wouldnt the cross be on the charleston side? lol https://imgur.com/a/kYCaR
Can you read a map? Where is the cross? Mt. Pleasant. Is there an age requirement for this website?
anus905
2018-04-08 06:10:00
sorry i didnt realize you arbitrarily placed a triangle on a map...
anus905
2018-04-08 06:12:00
could also be the start of the cooper river, which goes from lake moultrie to the ocean.
anus905
2018-04-08 06:16:00
phinetic wrote::
lol bro theres a map of Charleston. Its in the picture. Anyone can get that reference. Theres no reason to have a reference to pearman bridge if it didnt go that way. You're telling me most people would see the pearman bridge reference and then notice the map of charelston? Answer me this, which one is it:
1) You notice the map of Charleston, and then notice the pearman bridge reference leading you to mount pleasant
2) You notice pearman bridge, and then notice the map of charelston and think its leading you to charelston
What is the purpose? cause the casque is buried in charleston. the puzzle takes you all over, not all of it relates to the treasure hunt, specifically.
the exact reason, he takes you over the pearman bridge to patriot's point, is because that is where you would need to go to catch the ferry to fort sumter in 1981...
anus905
2018-04-08 06:18:00
you actually follow the path the cannons took for the most part.
JamesV
2018-04-11 00:38:00
davinci4 wrote::
. One question I had was regarding the tree that was out front in the 80s. Do we know what type it was? Would have been really amazing if it was a pear tree. Just a quick follow-up on this one, as I was never able to find a definitive answer. Besides NPS, I also reached out to the Seminole Nation's Ah-Tah-Thi-Ki Museum with a research request, but the manager I spoke with had no information since Osceola's burial and subsequent gravesite maintenance was handled entirely by the US Government. Her best guess was that the "missing tree" beneath Osceola's grave might actually be a mahogany, and that it could have either grown naturally or been planted by Fort Moultrie personnel.
So there's that.
JamesV
2018-04-15 20:46:00
A while back, Sullivan's Island Magazine asked me to write an article for them about the ongoing I2 search. Here's the link in case anyone's interested:
http://sullivansislandmagazine.com/s/20 ... ns-island/
anus905
2018-04-15 20:54:00
wheres sullivans island?
JamesV
2018-04-15 20:59:00
anus905 wrote::
wheres sullivans island? Don't ever change, Josh.
anus905
2018-04-15 21:08:00
oh I see, that's where fort moutlrie is didn't realize that was a separate island. why do you think its there?! I think that's in or around where you start. might go back to Dewee's Island via the butterfly relating to the sea pansy, which is bio luminescent and buries itself in sand.
davinci4
2018-04-15 21:13:00
JamesV wrote::
A while back, Sullivan's Island Magazine asked me to write an article for them about the ongoing I2 search. Here's the link in case anyone's interested:
http://sullivansislandmagazine.com/s/20 ... ns-island/ Great article James! ...did the archeologists ever give you a sense of their process? Do they require some physical evidence (GPR, ground probing) of the casque before they will actually dig? You have such a great solution mapped out in a very specific area. Wondering what ‘steps’ are required on their end to move forward.
MrBackstop
2018-04-17 11:30:00
James, nicely done. Good to hear someone has the opportunity to make such close connections in the area around their solve.
JamesV
2018-04-17 19:55:00
davinci4 wrote::
Wondering what ‘steps’ are required on their end to move forward. To be honest, I don't really know myself, so I don't want to speculate too far outside my lane. Could be months, could be years before we see any kind of movement? I'd love to have some kind of definite way forward lined up before this summer though, since I'm slated to head back overseas for a couple more years. Although I told NPS, if a dig were to get approved then I'd definitely be on the first flight home!
davinci4
2018-04-17 22:37:00
JamesV wrote::
To be honest, I don't really know myself, so I don't want to speculate too far outside my lane. Could be months, could be years before we see any kind of movement? I'd love to have some kind of definite way forward lined up before this summer though, since I'm slated to head back overseas for a couple more years. Although I told NPS, if a dig were to get approved then I'd definitely be on the first flight home! I think it really comes down to how much ‘historical significance’ they place on the cask. As exciting as a discovery it would be, I would be curious to know how they would view the recovery from an archeological perspective. It seems in other areas there has been some good cooperation from the local archeologist. Even archeologists though have to go through their approval process, which given the proposed location here, may take more time.
gManTexas
2018-04-17 23:14:00
davinci4 wrote::
I think it really comes down to how much ‘historical significance’ they place on the cask. As exciting as a discovery it would be, I would be curious to know how they would view the recovery from an archeological perspective. It seems in other areas there has been some good cooperation from the local archeologist. Even archeologists though have to go through their approval process, which given the proposed location here, may take more time. I suppose if someone found some lost writings from Edgar Allan Poe that said The Gold Bug was real and there was an actual treasure, archaeologists would be all over that. The Secret, maybe not so much...
JamesV
2018-04-27 23:37:00
Just wanted to pass along "Where is Osceola?", a cool 1968 article from Sandlapper, the now-defunct magazine of South Carolina. Interesting to read about the alleged "grave robbing" which led to Osceola's re-interment the next year. Article starts on page 43...and just FYI, as best as I could tell from NPS photos, that cypress tree alongside Osceola's grave was gone by 1976:
https://dc.statelibrary.sc.gov/bitstrea ... sAllowed=y
gManTexas
2018-04-28 03:28:00
JamesV wrote::
Just wanted to pass along "Where is Osceola?", a cool 1968 article from Sandlapper, the now-defunct magazine of South Carolina. Interesting to read about the alleged "grave robbing" which led to Osceola's re-interment the next year. Article starts on page 43...and just FYI, as best as I could tell from NPS photos, that cypress tree alongside Osceola's grave was gone by 1976:
https://dc.statelibrary.sc.gov/bitstrea ... sAllowed=y Hey James, this is pretty cool. I'm going to see if there are other issues. Do you have a quick link, or should I hunt around?
JamesV
2018-04-28 10:00:00
gManTexas wrote::
Hey James, this is pretty cool. I'm going to see if there are other issues. Do you have a quick link, or should I hunt around? Never hunt when you don't have to! Here's the link to the SC Digital Library Archives...it's an awesome resource for exploring any of the proposed dig sites for Image 2:
http://scmemory.org
.
UnprovenFact
2018-05-20 23:31:00
Full disclosure: Admittedly, I was not even aware of The Secret until the airing of one of my favorite shows earlier this year. Yes, I am one of those people on here. Unlike the real diehard fans of the book who have been collaborating and searching for years, I just dvr’d an episode of ExU, and here we are. However, I will try to do my best. (If short on time, Scroll to last paragraph for the good part. But where is the fun in that?)
A couple things about me before I get started… First, I do not proclaim to be an expert at anything. If what I have to say sounds uninformed, it might actually be. Second, even I will agree that some of my ramblings may get a little repetitive and off track at times, and I will try to stay as coherent and on-point as I can. No guarantees. Third, I have been reading hundreds of posts and looking at thousands of photos, traveling up and down the streets of Charleston (with Google Maps, of course), perusing magazine and newspaper articles, as well as reading up on the overall history of Charleston and its many museums, forts, historic homes and the people who lived there. If I post something that seems like old news, my apologies. I have so much bouncing around in my head on this that I can’t keep it all straight.
I like Charleston and the surrounding area as a vacation spot. I had been there a few years ago with no knowledge of The Secret. To think I may have been standing on top of it and not even known. After doing some reading, I drove down there earlier this month to poke around a little. Clearly, I didn’t find anything, or my one and only post on here would just read, “Found it!” I formed a plan and made two carefully thought-out lists: One was buildings, parks, streets and forts to inspect, photograph and crawl around. The other was restaurants. I like to eat, and I needed my strength for all that searching.
Now, let’s get to it…
Unfortunately for you all, I kind of have to start at the beginning. For me, that is Image 2. Obviously. Although it appears not everyone is in agreement that it is depicting Charleston, I think I am in the majority who say it is clearly Charleston. The Charleston area has a clear historic link to Africa. By no means am I saying it is a good link, but it is what it is, and we can all learn from history.
Breaking down the parts of Image 2 from top to bottom:
The Lion: I was not able to get a real lion at the zoo to sit still long enough to inspect its face, so I went online for photos to make some comparisons. Overall, the image looks pretty spot-on when compared to photos of actual lions. Some similarities are the general shape and coloring of the head, the eyes and the light patches underneath, and the contemplative look on the face. Some slight differences between the online photos and the Image 2 lion are the shape of the nose, ears and mane. However, I know not all lions are the same, so it seems like the differences are maybe coincidental or artistic preference and not necessarily intended to be clues other than the clear connection to Africa. There is a shadowy image on the forehead. To me, it looks like the designs in the slate rocks used to make sidewalks all over Charleston. Or maybe a rough sketch of a city’s boundary lines. So why a male lion? There are female lions in Africa. Female lions have foreheads. Maybe a male is a more powerful image. Maybe we need the connection of “King” later. Maybe it has to be a male lion, so he can give it a strange hairline and hide markings in the mane that appear to be letters, numbers, and/or shapes. Some think they see “Navy Yard” in the top of the mane. Maybe it is “Heyward”. As for the numbers, we all seem to think we know what they are, so I will move to the Mask.
The Mask: It appears to be a reference to African culture as well. Some tribes or groups would carve masks for specific purposes – rituals, ceremonies, special occasions, war, etc. I found so many examples online. Some are big. Some are small. Some are short. Some are long. Some have huge holes for eyes. Some have tiny slits for eyes. Some have an outline over the eyebrow area. Some are painted. Some have hair, fur, feathers, teeth and such. Some are very crude carvings. Some are beautifully crafted, ornate pieces of art. But not one of the examples I saw online had a map of Charleston on the forehead. Pretty sure it’s Charleston. Moving on…
The “glasses” are not glasses. It looks more like a line (rope) draped over the crossbar or boom of a ship’s mast. Or something very similar. Any sailors, please chime in on the correct terminology. As an example, check out the mast/flagpole at the Carolina Yacht Club located 50 E. Bay Street. Or, really, any sailboat anywhere. The Yacht Club’s flag is a red and blue pennant with a white star in the center. That may come up later.
Now, The Fairy: We are apparently not all in agreement here. Cannons? Peacock feathers? Birds? Eskimo? Cobblestones? Beaches? I think I see a reverse of Sullivan’s Island on her lower right wing. Maybe. While I do see what other people are referring to as cannon(s) and stones and birds, the book talks about fairies, maybe it is just a fairy. But then why not go with a cute little smiling Tinkerbell-looking fairy? I think the image of the woman is more important than her fairy-ness. So, to me, she is not a fairy. She is a woman in a bikini standing in front of some butterfly wings. And for the wings, I would like to think that if JJP wanted to make mirror images of the wings, he would have the talent to do so. There must be some reason that the wings and the images on them are not symmetrical. Back to the woman. Her arms are folded with her hands just under her chin. Some think the shadows formed by her hands resemble a palm tree. Maybe. But I don’t think that correlates with the Verse 6 “Long Palm’s Shadow” unless it is just meant to connect the verse to the image. She has bracelets on which could symbolize slavery. Another post pointed out her resemblance to Wonder Woman. Maybe we are looking for an amazonium mine. Her eyes appear closed. Is she asleep? Just waking up? And why is she wearing what she is wearing? It must be to emphasize her body form. I believe there are only two other painted fairies in the other images – 5 and 11. The Image 5 fairy is a reference to a fountain in which there are several loosely-clothed figures, and fairy 5 is clothed similarly. The Image 11 fairy appears to reference a painting in which the figure is fully clothed, and fairy 11 is again clothed similarly. So, we need to find something similar-looking in the area. A statue or painting maybe. Also, I don’t think there is any writing or numbers in her hair. I think it is again meant to look like something in the area. Her “bikini bottoms” appear to be folded and loose, except for the middle portion. It appears brighter and sharp. An arrow? A sail? Not sure, but it is clearly different from the rest of her outfit.
The Tree: The branch looks like any tree branch on just about any tree. It kind of resembles the shape of the live oak tree branches in the parks. I don’t know that the exact type is as important as the overall reason for it being there. One school of thought is that it is a map of the highway connecting Charleston to Mount Pleasant, and then on to Sullivan’s Island and Fort Moultrie. I understand that Sullivan’s Island was said to be the “Ellis Island of slavery” which further connects the image to Africa. However, while I enjoyed searching all over Fort Moultrie and the surrounding beaches and connecting everything to Poe, Osceola (or Oceola), and so on, I still think the location is Charleston. We might need to know about Sullivan’s Island, Fort Moultrie, Poe, etc. But having everything else point to Charleston just to have the location be on Sullivan’s Island is like having all the clues pointing to San Francisco and saying, “Ok, now let’s go look in Oakland.” Our tree branch may resemble the roads, which have changed since the 80’s, but I think it is more likely that it just represents a tree. It may also be a decorative addition to have something from which the pear and pedant hang.
The Pear: Some think it points us to the Pearman Bridge, which came down after the new Ravenel Bridge opened in 2005. I think it is just a pear. Actually, I think it is a loquat. But rather than paint a loquat and have readers wonder what that funny looking pear is doing there, JJP pained a pear – something most people would recognize. There are loquat trees all over the area, and if I need to make a loose connection here: Loquat… in the Lowcountry? Heh? Maybe not. It is also possible that the faint image below the pear is a base, and the pear resembles a ball shape. This can be seen atop the brick gateposts at some of the historic homes and plantations. Or maybe it’s just a pear.
The Flower: It appears to be a daisy. But the center is not a raised fluffy yellow button like you see on daisies. It is a flat oval shape. Given that the round table in the SF image is thought to be the trolley turnaround, maybe this is also pointing us to something flat and round (or oval) we should be seeing. Like a penny, or a table top. The daisy also has a shadow, which I think is just a possible connection to the verse. Daisy looks like a palm tree, has a shadow… “Beside the Long Palm’s Shadow”. That may be the only connection. It does look pretty busted up for a normally pretty flower. If it is only supposed to resemble a palm or palmetto tree, then ok, it does. Sort of. But if it is intended to reference something else, I don’t yet know what.
The Pendant (Fort Sumter): I don’t get it. We have this beautiful painting of a lion, a mask, a pear and a fairy, and then… a cartoon-looking pendant. Where is all the intricate detail found in the rest of the image? This is just a clock with big goofy eyes and a jacked-up grill. I have looked all over for anything that resembles the mouth. Could be stairs. Maybe a boat of some sort. Maybe it looks like teeth, because it is supposed to resemble the pointy teeth found on some African masks. At first, the eyes looked to me like manhole covers. Look at the sidewalk outside the First Presbyterian Church at Market and Tradd. Maybe they are FDC caps from a specific building we are looking for. Maybe they are really screws. I think they look like Do Not Enter street signs – like those at King and S. Battery… or Church and Water St. Water is a theme in the images and verses, and there is a cross in the lion’s mane. Again, not sure. This next part is a little tricky. Mostly because I just really want it to be right. After looking at the Ft. Sumter pendant and then a map of Charleston, and then back and forth, back and forth, it finally hit me. The Sumter clock is set to 4:00, but it is off-center just slightly. Maybe this is True vs. Magnetic North, maybe something else… like what it refers to is also not quite North and South… like the streets of Charleston.
*Follow me here: If we overlay the Sumter clock hands on the map, they are a near-perfect match for Church and Water St. or Meeting and Water St. including the star on the face matching the star of the yacht club. If we use Church St., we have Do Not Enter signs for eyes. If we use Meeting, we have the manhole covers that we would pass as we move north. Either way, it puts the tip of the hour hand near the stairs on the battery. If we use Meeting St., the tip of the minute hand is near Four Corners of the Law, but more specifically, Washington Park. With Church and Water St. the tip of the minute hand is at the Heyward-Washington House and either way, “White house close at hand”. The HW house is not white, but Washington was a president... White House... Hand of a clock... We are close! I think the Sumter clock is a map to our location. That is why it looks a little off when compared to the rest of the painting. To help it stand out as a “Hey, look at me. Use me.” Then the mouth with 12 white pointy teeth falls right about where White Point Garden is. It is not that the cask location is in WPG, it is just confirming the alignment of our map. If I can tie in the colored bars on the other cheek, we are good to go!
Thanks All!
JoshCornell
2018-05-21 00:06:00
did you read my solution/watch my walkthrough vid of the treasure hunt? you follow the path of the cannons from Moultrie to sumter to eventually WPG.
the faery relates to an African butterfly which you then use to connect to a sea creature found on dewees island that is bioluminescent and buries itself in sand.
youre right about the mast, that introduces the naval theme of the puzzle (hunley, capstand, pirates, jasper being named after ships, first black naval captain, black dude who stole confed ship to warn union, sundial, and monument you pass on way to sundial...might have missed a couple)
end spot is/was the triangle shaped sandbox at the side of the Fort Sumter Association Building, which is designated by standing in the park and looking at the building- offset- between the sundial and cannon. there are four palms framed by this, and you deduce correct one by process of elimination. the bar that binds clue tells you that its under the protection of the breaker wall...as the bar binds water, which you discern from the book on binyara kitaro (#19 in E. African Studies Collection). this relates to the battery wall which acts to protect both the treasures location and nice houses that line that road (Murray), along the S battery wall. if you didn't get visual clues, youd think it was prob at East Battery Wall by the Saussere House, instead of by the FSAB.
final location is in painting under arms of faery, both the palm's shadow and triangle shaped sandbox.
JoshCornell
2018-05-21 00:06:00
also, did you eat at the Gnome Café?
JoshCornell
2018-05-21 00:16:00
you missed the connections when you were at 50 E Bay...lol...that's where you were supposed to go to solve the ornament clue. if you are just doing treasure hunt and start at bandstand, then you use the ornament to send you down toward 50 E Bay, past Rainbow Row, and where the pirates were buried off the point in the marshes along the E battery wall (which was then used as fill to build the houses on).
when you get to 50 E Bay you see the lion (door knocker), and stars on the building (telling you that the star on the FS ornament is a building). so we now know that because the star is white, and it relates to a building, that relates to FS...that it is the FSAB.
when you get there after going to NE corner for pirate clue...you see sundial about naval disaster that went down in 4 minutes in april. you use the arm extended at 4pm alongside the cannon to designate your orientation to finish off and deduce which palms are possible markers. and going from there...
JoshCornell
2018-05-21 00:19:00
this is the very succinct map of only the primary readings of the verse (and visual) clues directly relating to the treasure hunt, starting at the bandstand and ending at FSAB.
https://www.google.ca/maps/dir/32.76985 ... m0!1m0!3e1
JoshCornell
2018-05-21 00:23:00
really youd start at least at Moultrie and maybe even further back, like Dewees Island...I haven't mapped this one all out yet. then youd go to patriots point and take the ferry to sumter, where youd learn naval history, about the cannons, and fall of the union at those spots. then youd cross over the Pearman Bridge (since rebuilt and renamed) as you head into Charleston, at which point youd go down E Bay towards WPG...although it might take you elsewhere before that...youd at least pass slave mart and all that stuff up past 50 E Bay.
catherwood
2018-05-21 19:47:00
UnprovenFact wrote::
Full disclosure: Admittedly, I was not even aware of The Secret until the airing of one of my favorite shows earlier this year. Yes, I am one of those people on here. Unlike the real diehard fans of the book who have been collaborating and searching for years, I just dvr’d an episode of ExU, and here we are. However, I will try to do my best. That's all we ask. Welcome to the forum. I hope you are used to how the internet attracts all sorts of personalities, as you will get to know a variety of people here. You might not have the time nor the stomach to read all of the threads and all of the posts and all of our history, but at least you have acknowledged that it exists. Do not be discouraged by the loudest voices, for you will soon be able to identify which "solutions" and "advice" are of the most use to you.
gManTexas
2018-05-21 19:54:00
UnprovenFact wrote::
Full disclosure: Admittedly, I was not even aware of The Secret until the airing of one of my favorite shows earlier this year. Yes, I am one of those people on here. Unlike the real diehard fans of the book who have been collaborating and searching for years, I just dvr’d an episode of ExU, and here we are. However, I will try to do my best. (If short on time, Scroll to last paragraph for the good part. But where is the fun in that?)
A couple things about me before I get started… First, I do not proclaim to be an expert at anything. If what I have to say sounds uninformed, it might actually be. Second, even I will agree that some of my ramblings may get a little repetitive and off track at times, and I will try to stay as coherent and on-point as I can. No guarantees. Third, I have been reading hundreds of posts and looking at thousands of photos, traveling up and down the streets of Charleston (with Google Maps, of course), perusing magazine and newspaper articles, as well as reading up on the overall history of Charleston and its many museums, forts, historic homes and the people who lived there. If I post something that seems like old news, my apologies. I have so much bouncing around in my head on this that I can’t keep it all straight.
I like Charleston and the surrounding area as a vacation spot. I had been there a few years ago with no knowledge of The Secret. To think I may have been standing on top of it and not even known. After doing some reading, I drove down there earlier this month to poke around a little. Clearly, I didn’t find anything, or my one and only post on here would just read, “Found it!” I formed a plan and made two carefully thought-out lists: One was buildings, parks, streets and forts to inspect, photograph and crawl around. The other was restaurants. I like to eat, and I needed my strength for all that searching.
Now, let’s get to it…
Unfortunately for you all, I kind of have to start at the beginning. For me, that is Image 2. Obviously. Although it appears not everyone is in agreement that it is depicting Charleston, I think I am in the majority who say it is clearly Charleston. The Charleston area has a clear historic link to Africa. By no means am I saying it is a good link, but it is what it is, and we can all learn from history.
Breaking down the parts of Image 2 from top to bottom:
The Lion: I was not able to get a real lion at the zoo to sit still long enough to inspect its face, so I went online for photos to make some comparisons. Overall, the image looks pretty spot-on when compared to photos of actual lions. Some similarities are the general shape and coloring of the head, the eyes and the light patches underneath, and the contemplative look on the face. Some slight differences between the online photos and the Image 2 lion are the shape of the nose, ears and mane. However, I know not all lions are the same, so it seems like the differences are maybe coincidental or artistic preference and not necessarily intended to be clues other than the clear connection to Africa. There is a shadowy image on the forehead. To me, it looks like the designs in the slate rocks used to make sidewalks all over Charleston. Or maybe a rough sketch of a city’s boundary lines. So why a male lion? There are female lions in Africa. Female lions have foreheads. Maybe a male is a more powerful image. Maybe we need the connection of “King” later. Maybe it has to be a male lion, so he can give it a strange hairline and hide markings in the mane that appear to be letters, numbers, and/or shapes. Some think they see “Navy Yard” in the top of the mane. Maybe it is “Heyward”. As for the numbers, we all seem to think we know what they are, so I will move to the Mask.
The Mask: It appears to be a reference to African culture as well. Some tribes or groups would carve masks for specific purposes – rituals, ceremonies, special occasions, war, etc. I found so many examples online. Some are big. Some are small. Some are short. Some are long. Some have huge holes for eyes. Some have tiny slits for eyes. Some have an outline over the eyebrow area. Some are painted. Some have hair, fur, feathers, teeth and such. Some are very crude carvings. Some are beautifully crafted, ornate pieces of art. But not one of the examples I saw online had a map of Charleston on the forehead. Pretty sure it’s Charleston. Moving on…
The “glasses” are not glasses. It looks more like a line (rope) draped over the crossbar or boom of a ship’s mast. Or something very similar. Any sailors, please chime in on the correct terminology. As an example, check out the mast/flagpole at the Carolina Yacht Club located 50 E. Bay Street. Or, really, any sailboat anywhere. The Yacht Club’s flag is a red and blue pennant with a white star in the center. That may come up later.
Now, The Fairy: We are apparently not all in agreement here. Cannons? Peacock feathers? Birds? Eskimo? Cobblestones? Beaches? I think I see a reverse of Sullivan’s Island on her lower right wing. Maybe. While I do see what other people are referring to as cannon(s) and stones and birds, the book talks about fairies, maybe it is just a fairy. But then why not go with a cute little smiling Tinkerbell-looking fairy? I think the image of the woman is more important than her fairy-ness. So, to me, she is not a fairy. She is a woman in a bikini standing in front of some butterfly wings. And for the wings, I would like to think that if JJP wanted to make mirror images of the wings, he would have the talent to do so. There must be some reason that the wings and the images on them are not symmetrical. Back to the woman. Her arms are folded with her hands just under her chin. Some think the shadows formed by her hands resemble a palm tree. Maybe. But I don’t think that correlates with the Verse 6 “Long Palm’s Shadow” unless it is just meant to connect the verse to the image. She has bracelets on which could symbolize slavery. Another post pointed out her resemblance to Wonder Woman. Maybe we are looking for an amazonium mine. Her eyes appear closed. Is she asleep? Just waking up? And why is she wearing what she is wearing? It must be to emphasize her body form. I believe there are only two other painted fairies in the other images – 5 and 11. The Image 5 fairy is a reference to a fountain in which there are several loosely-clothed figures, and fairy 5 is clothed similarly. The Image 11 fairy appears to reference a painting in which the figure is fully clothed, and fairy 11 is again clothed similarly. So, we need to find something similar-looking in the area. A statue or painting maybe. Also, I don’t think there is any writing or numbers in her hair. I think it is again meant to look like something in the area. Her “bikini bottoms” appear to be folded and loose, except for the middle portion. It appears brighter and sharp. An arrow? A sail? Not sure, but it is clearly different from the rest of her outfit.
The Tree: The branch looks like any tree branch on just about any tree. It kind of resembles the shape of the live oak tree branches in the parks. I don’t know that the exact type is as important as the overall reason for it being there. One school of thought is that it is a map of the highway connecting Charleston to Mount Pleasant, and then on to Sullivan’s Island and Fort Moultrie. I understand that Sullivan’s Island was said to be the “Ellis Island of slavery” which further connects the image to Africa. However, while I enjoyed searching all over Fort Moultrie and the surrounding beaches and connecting everything to Poe, Osceola (or Oceola), and so on, I still think the location is Charleston. We might need to know about Sullivan’s Island, Fort Moultrie, Poe, etc. But having everything else point to Charleston just to have the location be on Sullivan’s Island is like having all the clues pointing to San Francisco and saying, “Ok, now let’s go look in Oakland.” Our tree branch may resemble the roads, which have changed since the 80’s, but I think it is more likely that it just represents a tree. It may also be a decorative addition to have something from which the pear and pedant hang.
The Pear: Some think it points us to the Pearman Bridge, which came down after the new Ravenel Bridge opened in 2005. I think it is just a pear. Actually, I think it is a loquat. But rather than paint a loquat and have readers wonder what that funny looking pear is doing there, JJP pained a pear – something most people would recognize. There are loquat trees all over the area, and if I need to make a loose connection here: Loquat… in the Lowcountry? Heh? Maybe not. It is also possible that the faint image below the pear is a base, and the pear resembles a ball shape. This can be seen atop the brick gateposts at some of the historic homes and plantations. Or maybe it’s just a pear.
The Flower: It appears to be a daisy. But the center is not a raised fluffy yellow button like you see on daisies. It is a flat oval shape. Given that the round table in the SF image is thought to be the trolley turnaround, maybe this is also pointing us to something flat and round (or oval) we should be seeing. Like a penny, or a table top. The daisy also has a shadow, which I think is just a possible connection to the verse. Daisy looks like a palm tree, has a shadow… “Beside the Long Palm’s Shadow”. That may be the only connection. It does look pretty busted up for a normally pretty flower. If it is only supposed to resemble a palm or palmetto tree, then ok, it does. Sort of. But if it is intended to reference something else, I don’t yet know what.
The Pendant (Fort Sumter): I don’t get it. We have this beautiful painting of a lion, a mask, a pear and a fairy, and then… a cartoon-looking pendant. Where is all the intricate detail found in the rest of the image? This is just a clock with big goofy eyes and a jacked-up grill. I have looked all over for anything that resembles the mouth. Could be stairs. Maybe a boat of some sort. Maybe it looks like teeth, because it is supposed to resemble the pointy teeth found on some African masks. At first, the eyes looked to me like manhole covers. Look at the sidewalk outside the First Presbyterian Church at Market and Tradd. Maybe they are FDC caps from a specific building we are looking for. Maybe they are really screws. I think they look like Do Not Enter street signs – like those at King and S. Battery… or Church and Water St. Water is a theme in the images and verses, and there is a cross in the lion’s mane. Again, not sure. This next part is a little tricky. Mostly because I just really want it to be right. After looking at the Ft. Sumter pendant and then a map of Charleston, and then back and forth, back and forth, it finally hit me. The Sumter clock is set to 4:00, but it is off-center just slightly. Maybe this is True vs. Magnetic North, maybe something else… like what it refers to is also not quite North and South… like the streets of Charleston.
*Follow me here: If we overlay the Sumter clock hands on the map, they are a near-perfect match for Church and Water St. or Meeting and Water St. including the star on the face matching the star of the yacht club. If we use Church St., we have Do Not Enter signs for eyes. If we use Meeting, we have the manhole covers that we would pass as we move north. Either way, it puts the tip of the hour hand near the stairs on the battery. If we use Meeting St., the tip of the minute hand is near Four Corners of the Law, but more specifically, Washington Park. With Church and Water St. the tip of the minute hand is at the Heyward-Washington House and either way, “White house close at hand”. The HW house is not white, but Washington was a president... White House... Hand of a clock... We are close! I think the Sumter clock is a map to our location. That is why it looks a little off when compared to the rest of the painting. To help it stand out as a “Hey, look at me. Use me.” Then the mouth with 12 white pointy teeth falls right about where White Point Garden is. It is not that the cask location is in WPG, it is just confirming the alignment of our map. If I can tie in the colored bars on the other cheek, we are good to go!
Thanks All! Man, I'm upset that I missed this because it got buried by Josh Cornell's maniacal ravings. I want to read what you've written three times because it in inspiring. I'll be back with some thoughts, but thanks for sharing!
karleen
2018-05-21 21:51:00
catherwood wrote::
That's all we ask. Welcome to the forum. I hope you are used to how the internet attracts all sorts of personalities, as you will get to know a variety of people here. You might not have the time nor the stomach to read all of the threads and all of the posts and all of our history, but at least you have acknowledged that it exists. Do not be discouraged by the loudest voices, for you will soon be able to identify which "solutions" and "advice" are of the most use to you. Catherwood- thank you so much for posting this.
karleen
2018-05-21 21:52:00
UnprovenFact wrote::
Full disclosure: Admittedly, I was not even aware of The Secret until the airing of one of my favorite shows earlier this year. Yes, I am one of those people on here. Unlike the real diehard fans of the book who have been collaborating and searching for years, I just dvr’d an episode of ExU, and here we are. However, I will try to do my best. (If short on time, Scroll to last paragraph for the good part. But where is the fun in that?)
A couple things about me before I get started… First, I do not proclaim to be an expert at anything. If what I have to say sounds uninformed, it might actually be. Second, even I will agree that some of my ramblings may get a little repetitive and off track at times, and I will try to stay as coherent and on-point as I can. No guarantees. Third, I have been reading hundreds of posts and looking at thousands of photos, traveling up and down the streets of Charleston (with Google Maps, of course), perusing magazine and newspaper articles, as well as reading up on the overall history of Charleston and its many museums, forts, historic homes and the people who lived there. If I post something that seems like old news, my apologies. I have so much bouncing around in my head on this that I can’t keep it all straight.
I like Charleston and the surrounding area as a vacation spot. I had been there a few years ago with no knowledge of The Secret. To think I may have been standing on top of it and not even known. After doing some reading, I drove down there earlier this month to poke around a little. Clearly, I didn’t find anything, or my one and only post on here would just read, “Found it!” I formed a plan and made two carefully thought-out lists: One was buildings, parks, streets and forts to inspect, photograph and crawl around. The other was restaurants. I like to eat, and I needed my strength for all that searching.
Now, let’s get to it…
Unfortunately for you all, I kind of have to start at the beginning. For me, that is Image 2. Obviously. Although it appears not everyone is in agreement that it is depicting Charleston, I think I am in the majority who say it is clearly Charleston. The Charleston area has a clear historic link to Africa. By no means am I saying it is a good link, but it is what it is, and we can all learn from history.
Breaking down the parts of Image 2 from top to bottom:
The Lion: I was not able to get a real lion at the zoo to sit still long enough to inspect its face, so I went online for photos to make some comparisons. Overall, the image looks pretty spot-on when compared to photos of actual lions. Some similarities are the general shape and coloring of the head, the eyes and the light patches underneath, and the contemplative look on the face. Some slight differences between the online photos and the Image 2 lion are the shape of the nose, ears and mane. However, I know not all lions are the same, so it seems like the differences are maybe coincidental or artistic preference and not necessarily intended to be clues other than the clear connection to Africa. There is a shadowy image on the forehead. To me, it looks like the designs in the slate rocks used to make sidewalks all over Charleston. Or maybe a rough sketch of a city’s boundary lines. So why a male lion? There are female lions in Africa. Female lions have foreheads. Maybe a male is a more powerful image. Maybe we need the connection of “King” later. Maybe it has to be a male lion, so he can give it a strange hairline and hide markings in the mane that appear to be letters, numbers, and/or shapes. Some think they see “Navy Yard” in the top of the mane. Maybe it is “Heyward”. As for the numbers, we all seem to think we know what they are, so I will move to the Mask.
The Mask: It appears to be a reference to African culture as well. Some tribes or groups would carve masks for specific purposes – rituals, ceremonies, special occasions, war, etc. I found so many examples online. Some are big. Some are small. Some are short. Some are long. Some have huge holes for eyes. Some have tiny slits for eyes. Some have an outline over the eyebrow area. Some are painted. Some have hair, fur, feathers, teeth and such. Some are very crude carvings. Some are beautifully crafted, ornate pieces of art. But not one of the examples I saw online had a map of Charleston on the forehead. Pretty sure it’s Charleston. Moving on…
The “glasses” are not glasses. It looks more like a line (rope) draped over the crossbar or boom of a ship’s mast. Or something very similar. Any sailors, please chime in on the correct terminology. As an example, check out the mast/flagpole at the Carolina Yacht Club located 50 E. Bay Street. Or, really, any sailboat anywhere. The Yacht Club’s flag is a red and blue pennant with a white star in the center. That may come up later.
Now, The Fairy: We are apparently not all in agreement here. Cannons? Peacock feathers? Birds? Eskimo? Cobblestones? Beaches? I think I see a reverse of Sullivan’s Island on her lower right wing. Maybe. While I do see what other people are referring to as cannon(s) and stones and birds, the book talks about fairies, maybe it is just a fairy. But then why not go with a cute little smiling Tinkerbell-looking fairy? I think the image of the woman is more important than her fairy-ness. So, to me, she is not a fairy. She is a woman in a bikini standing in front of some butterfly wings. And for the wings, I would like to think that if JJP wanted to make mirror images of the wings, he would have the talent to do so. There must be some reason that the wings and the images on them are not symmetrical. Back to the woman. Her arms are folded with her hands just under her chin. Some think the shadows formed by her hands resemble a palm tree. Maybe. But I don’t think that correlates with the Verse 6 “Long Palm’s Shadow” unless it is just meant to connect the verse to the image. She has bracelets on which could symbolize slavery. Another post pointed out her resemblance to Wonder Woman. Maybe we are looking for an amazonium mine. Her eyes appear closed. Is she asleep? Just waking up? And why is she wearing what she is wearing? It must be to emphasize her body form. I believe there are only two other painted fairies in the other images – 5 and 11. The Image 5 fairy is a reference to a fountain in which there are several loosely-clothed figures, and fairy 5 is clothed similarly. The Image 11 fairy appears to reference a painting in which the figure is fully clothed, and fairy 11 is again clothed similarly. So, we need to find something similar-looking in the area. A statue or painting maybe. Also, I don’t think there is any writing or numbers in her hair. I think it is again meant to look like something in the area. Her “bikini bottoms” appear to be folded and loose, except for the middle portion. It appears brighter and sharp. An arrow? A sail? Not sure, but it is clearly different from the rest of her outfit.
The Tree: The branch looks like any tree branch on just about any tree. It kind of resembles the shape of the live oak tree branches in the parks. I don’t know that the exact type is as important as the overall reason for it being there. One school of thought is that it is a map of the highway connecting Charleston to Mount Pleasant, and then on to Sullivan’s Island and Fort Moultrie. I understand that Sullivan’s Island was said to be the “Ellis Island of slavery” which further connects the image to Africa. However, while I enjoyed searching all over Fort Moultrie and the surrounding beaches and connecting everything to Poe, Osceola (or Oceola), and so on, I still think the location is Charleston. We might need to know about Sullivan’s Island, Fort Moultrie, Poe, etc. But having everything else point to Charleston just to have the location be on Sullivan’s Island is like having all the clues pointing to San Francisco and saying, “Ok, now let’s go look in Oakland.” Our tree branch may resemble the roads, which have changed since the 80’s, but I think it is more likely that it just represents a tree. It may also be a decorative addition to have something from which the pear and pedant hang.
The Pear: Some think it points us to the Pearman Bridge, which came down after the new Ravenel Bridge opened in 2005. I think it is just a pear. Actually, I think it is a loquat. But rather than paint a loquat and have readers wonder what that funny looking pear is doing there, JJP pained a pear – something most people would recognize. There are loquat trees all over the area, and if I need to make a loose connection here: Loquat… in the Lowcountry? Heh? Maybe not. It is also possible that the faint image below the pear is a base, and the pear resembles a ball shape. This can be seen atop the brick gateposts at some of the historic homes and plantations. Or maybe it’s just a pear.
The Flower: It appears to be a daisy. But the center is not a raised fluffy yellow button like you see on daisies. It is a flat oval shape. Given that the round table in the SF image is thought to be the trolley turnaround, maybe this is also pointing us to something flat and round (or oval) we should be seeing. Like a penny, or a table top. The daisy also has a shadow, which I think is just a possible connection to the verse. Daisy looks like a palm tree, has a shadow… “Beside the Long Palm’s Shadow”. That may be the only connection. It does look pretty busted up for a normally pretty flower. If it is only supposed to resemble a palm or palmetto tree, then ok, it does. Sort of. But if it is intended to reference something else, I don’t yet know what.
The Pendant (Fort Sumter): I don’t get it. We have this beautiful painting of a lion, a mask, a pear and a fairy, and then… a cartoon-looking pendant. Where is all the intricate detail found in the rest of the image? This is just a clock with big goofy eyes and a jacked-up grill. I have looked all over for anything that resembles the mouth. Could be stairs. Maybe a boat of some sort. Maybe it looks like teeth, because it is supposed to resemble the pointy teeth found on some African masks. At first, the eyes looked to me like manhole covers. Look at the sidewalk outside the First Presbyterian Church at Market and Tradd. Maybe they are FDC caps from a specific building we are looking for. Maybe they are really screws. I think they look like Do Not Enter street signs – like those at King and S. Battery… or Church and Water St. Water is a theme in the images and verses, and there is a cross in the lion’s mane. Again, not sure. This next part is a little tricky. Mostly because I just really want it to be right. After looking at the Ft. Sumter pendant and then a map of Charleston, and then back and forth, back and forth, it finally hit me. The Sumter clock is set to 4:00, but it is off-center just slightly. Maybe this is True vs. Magnetic North, maybe something else… like what it refers to is also not quite North and South… like the streets of Charleston.
*Follow me here: If we overlay the Sumter clock hands on the map, they are a near-perfect match for Church and Water St. or Meeting and Water St. including the star on the face matching the star of the yacht club. If we use Church St., we have Do Not Enter signs for eyes. If we use Meeting, we have the manhole covers that we would pass as we move north. Either way, it puts the tip of the hour hand near the stairs on the battery. If we use Meeting St., the tip of the minute hand is near Four Corners of the Law, but more specifically, Washington Park. With Church and Water St. the tip of the minute hand is at the Heyward-Washington House and either way, “White house close at hand”. The HW house is not white, but Washington was a president... White House... Hand of a clock... We are close! I think the Sumter clock is a map to our location. That is why it looks a little off when compared to the rest of the painting. To help it stand out as a “Hey, look at me. Use me.” Then the mouth with 12 white pointy teeth falls right about where White Point Garden is. It is not that the cask location is in WPG, it is just confirming the alignment of our map. If I can tie in the colored bars on the other cheek, we are good to go!
Thanks All! Thank you for posting a well-thought solve. I am not working on this location but I'm sure there are others that will be happy to help.
MrBackstop
2018-05-22 21:10:00
Unprovenfact, you put a tremendous amount of work into this....well done.
You may find people here who agree with all or some of your ideas, or you may have people that think you are out of your mind. I've been in both boats myself. But keep this in mind, we are all correct until someone proves your solve right or wrong.
Good Luck
JoshCornell
2018-05-22 22:24:00
lol
gManTexas
2018-05-22 22:48:00
UnprovenFact wrote::
Full disclosure: Admittedly, I was not even aware of The Secret until the airing of one of my favorite shows earlier this year. Yes, I am one of those people on here. Unlike the real diehard fans of the book who have been collaborating and searching for years, I just dvr’d an episode of ExU, and here we are. However, I will try to do my best. (If short on time, Scroll to last paragraph for the good part. But where is the fun in that?)
A couple things about me before I get started… First, I do not proclaim to be an expert at anything. If what I have to say sounds uninformed, it might actually be. Second, even I will agree that some of my ramblings may get a little repetitive and off track at times, and I will try to stay as coherent and on-point as I can. No guarantees. Third, I have been reading hundreds of posts and looking at thousands of photos, traveling up and down the streets of Charleston (with Google Maps, of course), perusing magazine and newspaper articles, as well as reading up on the overall history of Charleston and its many museums, forts, historic homes and the people who lived there. If I post something that seems like old news, my apologies. I have so much bouncing around in my head on this that I can’t keep it all straight.
I like Charleston and the surrounding area as a vacation spot. I had been there a few years ago with no knowledge of The Secret. To think I may have been standing on top of it and not even known. After doing some reading, I drove down there earlier this month to poke around a little. Clearly, I didn’t find anything, or my one and only post on here would just read, “Found it!” I formed a plan and made two carefully thought-out lists: One was buildings, parks, streets and forts to inspect, photograph and crawl around. The other was restaurants. I like to eat, and I needed my strength for all that searching.
Now, let’s get to it…
Unfortunately for you all, I kind of have to start at the beginning. For me, that is Image 2. Obviously. Although it appears not everyone is in agreement that it is depicting Charleston, I think I am in the majority who say it is clearly Charleston. The Charleston area has a clear historic link to Africa. By no means am I saying it is a good link, but it is what it is, and we can all learn from history.
Breaking down the parts of Image 2 from top to bottom:
The Lion: I was not able to get a real lion at the zoo to sit still long enough to inspect its face, so I went online for photos to make some comparisons. Overall, the image looks pretty spot-on when compared to photos of actual lions. Some similarities are the general shape and coloring of the head, the eyes and the light patches underneath, and the contemplative look on the face. Some slight differences between the online photos and the Image 2 lion are the shape of the nose, ears and mane. However, I know not all lions are the same, so it seems like the differences are maybe coincidental or artistic preference and not necessarily intended to be clues other than the clear connection to Africa. There is a shadowy image on the forehead. To me, it looks like the designs in the slate rocks used to make sidewalks all over Charleston. Or maybe a rough sketch of a city’s boundary lines. So why a male lion? There are female lions in Africa. Female lions have foreheads. Maybe a male is a more powerful image. Maybe we need the connection of “King” later. Maybe it has to be a male lion, so he can give it a strange hairline and hide markings in the mane that appear to be letters, numbers, and/or shapes. Some think they see “Navy Yard” in the top of the mane. Maybe it is “Heyward”. As for the numbers, we all seem to think we know what they are, so I will move to the Mask.
The Mask: It appears to be a reference to African culture as well. Some tribes or groups would carve masks for specific purposes – rituals, ceremonies, special occasions, war, etc. I found so many examples online. Some are big. Some are small. Some are short. Some are long. Some have huge holes for eyes. Some have tiny slits for eyes. Some have an outline over the eyebrow area. Some are painted. Some have hair, fur, feathers, teeth and such. Some are very crude carvings. Some are beautifully crafted, ornate pieces of art. But not one of the examples I saw online had a map of Charleston on the forehead. Pretty sure it’s Charleston. Moving on…
The “glasses” are not glasses. It looks more like a line (rope) draped over the crossbar or boom of a ship’s mast. Or something very similar. Any sailors, please chime in on the correct terminology. As an example, check out the mast/flagpole at the Carolina Yacht Club located 50 E. Bay Street. Or, really, any sailboat anywhere. The Yacht Club’s flag is a red and blue pennant with a white star in the center. That may come up later.
Now, The Fairy: We are apparently not all in agreement here. Cannons? Peacock feathers? Birds? Eskimo? Cobblestones? Beaches? I think I see a reverse of Sullivan’s Island on her lower right wing. Maybe. While I do see what other people are referring to as cannon(s) and stones and birds, the book talks about fairies, maybe it is just a fairy. But then why not go with a cute little smiling Tinkerbell-looking fairy? I think the image of the woman is more important than her fairy-ness. So, to me, she is not a fairy. She is a woman in a bikini standing in front of some butterfly wings. And for the wings, I would like to think that if JJP wanted to make mirror images of the wings, he would have the talent to do so. There must be some reason that the wings and the images on them are not symmetrical. Back to the woman. Her arms are folded with her hands just under her chin. Some think the shadows formed by her hands resemble a palm tree. Maybe. But I don’t think that correlates with the Verse 6 “Long Palm’s Shadow” unless it is just meant to connect the verse to the image. She has bracelets on which could symbolize slavery. Another post pointed out her resemblance to Wonder Woman. Maybe we are looking for an amazonium mine. Her eyes appear closed. Is she asleep? Just waking up? And why is she wearing what she is wearing? It must be to emphasize her body form. I believe there are only two other painted fairies in the other images – 5 and 11. The Image 5 fairy is a reference to a fountain in which there are several loosely-clothed figures, and fairy 5 is clothed similarly. The Image 11 fairy appears to reference a painting in which the figure is fully clothed, and fairy 11 is again clothed similarly. So, we need to find something similar-looking in the area. A statue or painting maybe. Also, I don’t think there is any writing or numbers in her hair. I think it is again meant to look like something in the area. Her “bikini bottoms” appear to be folded and loose, except for the middle portion. It appears brighter and sharp. An arrow? A sail? Not sure, but it is clearly different from the rest of her outfit.
The Tree: The branch looks like any tree branch on just about any tree. It kind of resembles the shape of the live oak tree branches in the parks. I don’t know that the exact type is as important as the overall reason for it being there. One school of thought is that it is a map of the highway connecting Charleston to Mount Pleasant, and then on to Sullivan’s Island and Fort Moultrie. I understand that Sullivan’s Island was said to be the “Ellis Island of slavery” which further connects the image to Africa. However, while I enjoyed searching all over Fort Moultrie and the surrounding beaches and connecting everything to Poe, Osceola (or Oceola), and so on, I still think the location is Charleston. We might need to know about Sullivan’s Island, Fort Moultrie, Poe, etc. But having everything else point to Charleston just to have the location be on Sullivan’s Island is like having all the clues pointing to San Francisco and saying, “Ok, now let’s go look in Oakland.” Our tree branch may resemble the roads, which have changed since the 80’s, but I think it is more likely that it just represents a tree. It may also be a decorative addition to have something from which the pear and pedant hang.
The Pear: Some think it points us to the Pearman Bridge, which came down after the new Ravenel Bridge opened in 2005. I think it is just a pear. Actually, I think it is a loquat. But rather than paint a loquat and have readers wonder what that funny looking pear is doing there, JJP pained a pear – something most people would recognize. There are loquat trees all over the area, and if I need to make a loose connection here: Loquat… in the Lowcountry? Heh? Maybe not. It is also possible that the faint image below the pear is a base, and the pear resembles a ball shape. This can be seen atop the brick gateposts at some of the historic homes and plantations. Or maybe it’s just a pear.
The Flower: It appears to be a daisy. But the center is not a raised fluffy yellow button like you see on daisies. It is a flat oval shape. Given that the round table in the SF image is thought to be the trolley turnaround, maybe this is also pointing us to something flat and round (or oval) we should be seeing. Like a penny, or a table top. The daisy also has a shadow, which I think is just a possible connection to the verse. Daisy looks like a palm tree, has a shadow… “Beside the Long Palm’s Shadow”. That may be the only connection. It does look pretty busted up for a normally pretty flower. If it is only supposed to resemble a palm or palmetto tree, then ok, it does. Sort of. But if it is intended to reference something else, I don’t yet know what.
The Pendant (Fort Sumter): I don’t get it. We have this beautiful painting of a lion, a mask, a pear and a fairy, and then… a cartoon-looking pendant. Where is all the intricate detail found in the rest of the image? This is just a clock with big goofy eyes and a jacked-up grill. I have looked all over for anything that resembles the mouth. Could be stairs. Maybe a boat of some sort. Maybe it looks like teeth, because it is supposed to resemble the pointy teeth found on some African masks. At first, the eyes looked to me like manhole covers. Look at the sidewalk outside the First Presbyterian Church at Market and Tradd. Maybe they are FDC caps from a specific building we are looking for. Maybe they are really screws. I think they look like Do Not Enter street signs – like those at King and S. Battery… or Church and Water St. Water is a theme in the images and verses, and there is a cross in the lion’s mane. Again, not sure. This next part is a little tricky. Mostly because I just really want it to be right. After looking at the Ft. Sumter pendant and then a map of Charleston, and then back and forth, back and forth, it finally hit me. The Sumter clock is set to 4:00, but it is off-center just slightly. Maybe this is True vs. Magnetic North, maybe something else… like what it refers to is also not quite North and South… like the streets of Charleston.
*Follow me here: If we overlay the Sumter clock hands on the map, they are a near-perfect match for Church and Water St. or Meeting and Water St. including the star on the face matching the star of the yacht club. If we use Church St., we have Do Not Enter signs for eyes. If we use Meeting, we have the manhole covers that we would pass as we move north. Either way, it puts the tip of the hour hand near the stairs on the battery. If we use Meeting St., the tip of the minute hand is near Four Corners of the Law, but more specifically, Washington Park. With Church and Water St. the tip of the minute hand is at the Heyward-Washington House and either way, “White house close at hand”. The HW house is not white, but Washington was a president... White House... Hand of a clock... We are close! I think the Sumter clock is a map to our location. That is why it looks a little off when compared to the rest of the painting. To help it stand out as a “Hey, look at me. Use me.” Then the mouth with 12 white pointy teeth falls right about where White Point Garden is. It is not that the cask location is in WPG, it is just confirming the alignment of our map. If I can tie in the colored bars on the other cheek, we are good to go!
Thanks All! I like this, most of it at least. The pear is a deliberately strange object to put in this image. It has significance.
It is hard to picture the mask in the shape of Fort Sumter as not being a reference to Sumter. Now, it could have a dual purpose and be a map overlay as you've suggested.
I also do not agree that the branch is insignificant. If I am correct, there are no pines in WPG, but there are in Hampton Park.
What is interesting to me is that you've analyzed the location without applying a Verse. That's pretty cool, but the way this game works is to pair them and use both to determine the final location.
Merlot Brougham
2018-05-23 02:48:00
UnprovenFact wrote::
At first, the eyes looked to me like manhole covers. )
Find the Earthquake bolt(s), find The cask. That is the "fence and fixture" of this image. I think.
I will admit you lost me at the end, but I respect your overall analysis and the perspective you are using to pick apart the clues.
JoshCornell
2018-05-23 19:19:00
Merlot Brougham wrote::
)
Find the Earthquake bolt(s), find The cask. That is the "fence and fixture" of this image. I think.
I will admit you lost me at the end, but I respect your overall analysis and the perspective you are using to pick apart the clues. wouldn't that be the triangle shaped sand garden marked by the palm under the faery's arms?
UnprovenFact
2018-05-23 20:01:00
I appreciate all of the input, and I will try to keep this and future posts shorter:
My first post was a mash up of every thought and every detail that came to mind while looking at this image (and others) over the past few months. It was all of my mental notes that I was having difficulty keeping straight. I initially typed it all out just to keep a record of my thoughts and ideas and to maybe someday post it piece-by-piece, but I got excited, and we all saw what happened. Believe it or not, that was an edited and condensed version. Can you imagine?
So, I read some responses to my first post, went back over some of my notes which didn’t make the cut, and I wanted to clarify a couple points which I see ruffled some well-established feathers:
Real Quick, my comments of the tree being a “decorative addition to have something from which the pear and pedant hang” and “…Or maybe it’s just a pear” were tongue-in-cheek and meant to be more of a transition to my next thought. I don’t know what the tree and pear mean yet, so it was kind of my way of saying, “Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar” and then move on to the next topic. No big deal.
For the tree branch: I don’t really know trees. I know maples, pines, and palms… and only because there are helicopters, pine cones, and coconuts on the ground underneath them. I can occasionally recognize some fruit trees, but only if they still have their fruit on them. I only recently learned about live oaks from my trips to the Charleston area. So, when I am saying the branch looks like any branch on any tree, it does – to me, anyway. I know there is a significance to the branch, because he likely would not have taken the time to paint it otherwise. I just think the significance is not necessarily in the species of tree, but rather the shape of the branch. If it really is the species, I don’t stand a chance. I really hope it is the shape. I believe it is Image 4 which has Ohio and a tower outlined in the trees. Maybe that is what we are looking for. I just don’t know yet. And I could swear I found that exact shape in one of the trees in Washington Park. But I don’t know.
The Pear: Also significant to the image, as it too would likely not have been painted otherwise. Or at least not so big. This pear is huge when compared to the woman’s head but about the right size if the lion wanted to eat it. No, I’m not saying lions eat pears. Maybe it is another example of painting in perspective, which could mean it is somehow closer to us in relation to the woman if we are standing in a particular spot. Or maybe it is of higher importance in the overall message of the image. I will say, if it had a little man painted inside it, I would absolutely agree Pear + Man = Pearman… Bridge. I suppose I see where that connection could be made with just the pear alone. I sometimes forget that major landmarks may no longer exist, so it is harder for me to relate them to the image. But this bridge thing got me thinking and looking around the internet. I may have an additional theory. More on that at a later time.
Fort Sumter: You can’t know about U.S. History without knowing about The Civil War… The South… Charleston… Fort Sumter. That is where the first shots took place. That is where it all started (sort of). So, the Sumter Fort-face-clock-pendant may be the most historically significant of all the images. Yes, Fort Pulaski along the Savannah River looks just like Fort Sumter, and the surrounding area around Pulaski and Hilton Head looks very similar to the islands, inlets, marshes, beaches and… Nope. I’m still going with Fort Sumter and Charleston. I’ve come too far to change cities.
The star on the Sumter face is approximately where the original flagpole was when it was a fort, and the colored bars on the other check are about where the flagpoles are now (sort of). Maybe this is significant. Or, it could be that the colored bars are Ft. Johnson, the star is Ft. Moultrie, and the mouth is Morris Island or more specifically Ft. Wagner. That would utilize all of the face images, including the clock hands which I think reference streets, and the eyes which may resemble earthquake bolts or street signs. I have street-viewed all up and down Charleston but still have not found earthquake bolt caps that resemble those screw eyes. However, if not manhole covers, bolt caps or street signs, another possible match could be the Carolopolis award plaques on the historic buildings. Maybe our path takes us between two buildings with those plaques on them. If they are referring to earthquake bolts, does anyone know of any earthquake bolts that go between two structures? From an engineering perspective, that doesn’t really make sense to do that, but what if three structures were at one time connected, and the middle structure was removed or destroyed? That might leave an area where the bolts are exposed. Or if there is a small alley or path between to structures, they may have connected them for added stability. Either scenario would thereby make visible a “Bar that binds.”
I will try to come up with a correlation to a verse at some point. That's all for now.
Mister EZ
2018-05-23 23:56:00
MrSeabass wrote::
The pear attached to the branch cannot and will not be anything but a representation of the Pearman bridge connected to the Coleman highway, full stop. Yeah...but...
Is the bridge about the right size if the lion wanted to eat it....
Wicket
2018-05-28 02:19:00
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wway9azlb2iipmm/raquel.pdf?dl=0
The lady in the doe skin bikini looks like Raquel Welch from the movie One Million Years BC. In the movie she is a blonde, however, she is a brunette bombshell. She wore fur cuffs around her ankles in the movie, in the painting she has cuffs on her wrists.
In the movie there were cavemen and dinosaurs. You could find them at the Charleston Museum of Natural History.
Spiritr
2018-06-12 15:21:00
any one care to educate me on what Verse the April image should wed to?
davinci4
2018-06-12 15:38:00
James V and White Rabbit’s solutions are best I have seen to date (Fort Moultrie).
JoshCornell
2018-06-12 16:19:00
are you kidding me? mine is way better....
erexere
2018-06-12 19:06:00
Mine are better.
Macfos
2018-06-12 19:45:00
Been out for a while... but reading the post above leading to Washington Square is intriguing. I have been interested in this location for a while...
Another item rarely discussed is the second set of numbers in the lions mane. 32/79 are coordinates for Charleston, but what about the 33 and 80?
Washington Square Park has two entrances. One is at 33 Chalmers Street (which is cobblestone) - The other entrance is 80 Broad Street, at the Four Corners of the Law.
Just my 2 pennies...
Regards,
Mac
JamesV
2018-06-12 20:32:00
davinci4 wrote::
James V and White Rabbit’s solutions are best I have seen to date (Fort Moultrie). No real updates from my end on Image 2/Verse 5 since I haven't been able to make it back to Charleston, although Burnstyle looked into the spot a little more back in April. He was able to link up with an NPS employee at Fort Moultrie to go over the spot we'd described, and although there was no GPR available that day the two of them did make contact with a ground probe. So there's something there... although given the area outside of the fort, it could very well be just a brick, or something similar, and I don't think there's any way to tell for sure without digging it out.
As always, the casque isn't found if it's still in the ground.
davinci4
2018-06-12 21:21:00
Wow! That’s actually pretty significant. Could be a brick or rock, but hitting something is better than nothing. Very interesting. Please keep us in the loop.
Diceycat
2018-06-13 15:33:00
Just putting this out there , but has anyone ever put something like a tiny coring device at the end of there probe just to see if you can cut into what ever you hit. That way you can see if any plexiglass gets inside the core after you pull your probe out to check. I’m sure plexiglass would be easy to cut through just put a T handle on the probe so you can turn it
erexere
2018-06-13 15:42:00
I have. No, plexi doesn't respond that well. Ideal conditions might give that result you're talking about. The trial and error process of not knowing if you've hit a rock or root or some other subsurface garbage puts a lot of wear and tear on the drill tool. My 20v Dewalt hammer drill was crying after punishing it in a clay rich area. Working it on my test box replica in my back yard, I was unable to penetrate the box when I used extra force. The ground temp beer cans hiding inside were safe and sound after rigorous testings.
catherwood
2018-06-14 00:02:00
Macfos wrote::
Another item rarely discussed is the second set of numbers in the lions mane. 32/79 are coordinates for Charleston, but what about the 33 and 80? Rarely discussed in the past many years, because early on it was assumed to be drawing a box, not pinpointing a GPS location. Back in the 1980s, the best access to latitude-longitude numbers to the average person was the grid lines in an atlas. Charleston is approximately somewhere between 32 and 33 degrees north latitude and between 79 and 80 degrees west longitude. No further accuracy was expected back then.
Macfos
2018-06-14 00:12:00
catherwood wrote::
Rarely discussed in the past many years, because early on it was assumed to be drawing a box, not pinpointing a GPS location. Back in the 1980s, the best access to latitude-longitude numbers to the average person was the grid lines in an atlas. Charleston is approximately somewhere between 32 and 33 degrees north latitude and between 79 and 80 degrees west longitude. No further accuracy was expected back then. Got it. Why dont we see that in other images? Seems like the second set of numbers may be more significant than just generalize coordinates.
Just my thoughts though.
Regards,
Mac
catherwood
2018-06-14 00:16:00
Macfos wrote::
Got it. Why dont we see that in other images? Seems like the second set of numbers may be more significant than just generalize coordinates. I know we've found pairs of numbers in other images, and they are always just one degree in difference, which reinforces the box concept. I don't have the list at hand, but i'm sure someone can point you to pre-existing lists of data.
MrBackstop
2018-06-15 15:26:00
erexere wrote::
I have. No, plexi doesn't respond that well. Ideal conditions might give that result you're talking about. The trial and error process of not knowing if you've hit a rock or root or some other subsurface garbage puts a lot of wear and tear on the drill tool. My 20v Dewalt hammer drill was crying after punishing it in a clay rich area. Working it on my test box replica in my back yard, I was unable to penetrate the box when I used extra force. The ground temp beer cans hiding inside were safe and sound after rigorous testings. Wait a minute, you put poor, helpless beer cans in a box underground? I wish I could have helped you dig them up....that's a true treasure right there.
maltedfalcon
2018-06-15 15:34:00
MrBackstop wrote::
Wait a minute, you put poor, helpless beer cans in a box underground? I know! He is an animal!
hardatlurk
2018-06-20 22:47:00
Has there been any discussion of the woman's feet in the image? They look alittle weird and are silhouetted...maybe their silhouette matches a landmark or part of a statue?
maltedfalcon
2018-06-20 23:00:00
hardatlurk wrote::
Has there been any discussion of the woman's feet in the image? They look alittle weird and are silhouetted...maybe their silhouette matches a landmark or part of a statue? I looked back I didn't see any discussion of them other than the thought they were submerged in water....
Good catch!
Macfos
2018-06-20 23:06:00
I remember reading that the feet were thought to look like the peninsula or possibly local rivers.
Another interesting thing is that the girl in general besides the hair resembles the "logo" of the Stella Maris church on Sullivans Island across the street from the Fort. I threw that out a while back but did not get any feedback except for drunknerds... which was a hoot. He is a funny dude.
Regards,
Mac
hardatlurk
2018-06-21 01:16:00
Macfos wrote::
I remember reading that the feet were thought to look like the peninsula or possibly local rivers.
Another interesting thing is that the girl in general besides the hair resembles the "logo" of the Stella Maris church on Sullivans Island across the street from the Fort. I threw that out a while back but did not get any feedback except for drunknerds... which was a hoot. He is a funny dude.
Regards,
Mac I could see them being the peninsula or the river, except we have have a depiction of all those on the mask. Msybe I just like feet, or maybe they look oddly squared off and pointy where tee toes would be. Flip them up side down and the silhouete could be the the outline of a building? If they are left right side up they kind look like horse hooves...?
Merlot Brougham
2018-06-21 01:27:00
Macfos wrote::
I remember reading that the feet were thought to look like the peninsula or possibly local rivers.
Another interesting thing is that the girl in general besides the hair resembles the "logo" of the Stella Maris church on Sullivans Island across the street from the Fort. I threw that out a while back but did not get any feedback except for drunknerds... which was a hoot. He is a funny dude.
Regards,
Mac I tried to find what you're talking about just now as far as the "logo" is concerned. Unfortunately, the link you posted earlier int thread now gives a 404 error.
Macfos
2018-06-21 02:33:00
Here is the artwork I was referring to:
Fineartamerica.com/shop/greeting+cards/stella+maris
Also note it is on Middle street. The passage of the boats with slaves from Africa was The Middle Passage.
Regards,
Mac
Macfos
2018-06-21 02:39:00
Also note the waves resemble the fairy wings and she is holding an old boat which could resemble the boat mast and rope next to the mask in the image.
In addition there is a very rare African cypress tree planted out front of the church which was brought a long time ago. There is an obelisk across the way at the fort and white stones at the ww2 memorial across the street. In addition, it is all sand.
Just sayin'
Regards,
Mac
JoshCornell
2018-06-25 16:16:00
that image doesnt look like the woman to me...
Spiritr
2018-06-26 05:43:00
JoshCornell wrote::
that image doesnt look like the woman to me... YES! it's a catfish upside down
JoshCornell
2018-06-27 17:39:00
what are you referring to spirit?
Spiritr
2018-06-28 14:26:00
JoshCornell wrote::
what are you referring to spirit? you should know what I'm referring. Since you've been there and you're right next to it. Check again, look carefully.
drunknerds
2018-06-29 04:08:00
Macfos wrote::
I remember reading that the feet were thought to look like the peninsula or possibly local rivers.
Another interesting thing is that the girl in general besides the hair resembles the "logo" of the Stella Maris church on Sullivans Island across the street from the Fort. I threw that out a while back but did not get any feedback except for drunknerds... which was a hoot. He is a funny dude.
Regards,
Mac Thanks!
I don't even remember this, but I hope I was more jovial than sarcastic. Can you throw the images up again?
Macfos
2018-06-29 18:51:00
The original one is gone, but I found a copy on another site. It was just the pose and the blueish of the water and the mast next to the skull that caught my attention. This was back when I was first looking at JamesV's solution. The cross in the lion's mane and some other older posts had me snooping around the church and the WWI memorial.
http://Fineartamerica.com/shop/greeting+cards/stella+maris
Regards,
Mac
Macfos
2018-06-29 19:32:00
Here are a bunch of pictures of Washington Square. I posted Marion Square a bit back in the thread. Trying to hit a different park here and there and get pics.
https://imgur.com/a/abep8ZM
Regards,
Mac
JoshCornell
2018-06-30 14:40:00
Spiritr wrote::
you should know what I'm referring. Since you've been there and you're right next to it. Check again, look carefully. i mean other than the catfish at the hunley monument...are you referring to the painting...or one of the pics macfos posted?
JamesV
2018-07-19 23:33:00
Macfos wrote::
In addition there is a very rare African cypress tree planted out front of the church which was brought a long time ago. This one?
The book didn't have any information about these trees out front, what type, when they were planted, etc.
jayheedan1
2018-08-02 03:15:00
Was it decided that it’s a pear in image two or a gourd? The gourd has a better connection to Africa.
http://www.amishgourds.com/product/kett ... argain-box
JoshCornell
2018-08-02 08:11:00
jayheedan1 wrote::
Was it decided that it’s a pear in image two or a gourd? The gourd has a better connection to Africa.
http://www.amishgourds.com/product/kett ... argain-box pearman bridge
jayheedan1
2018-08-02 12:25:00
JoshCornell wrote::
pearman bridge >:(
Yes I know about the Pearman bridge and that it’s no longer standing being demolished in 2005; that it extended over Drum island. I wanted to know, if collectively, the q4t at large believes that to be the correct clue. It had never been mentioned that it could be a gourd, and if there are any other possible connections then pearman.
After having a map and a road route why also emphasize this bridge? Why is there a representation of fort sumpter and not the other forts in the bay? (Yes I read you feel it’s buried with in the fort, some claimed by Osceolas grave). I don’t think Priess would have buried in a fort, but maybe that a bias of my generation. Preiss was born in ‘53, Does anyone that grew up in the 50’s or 60’s feel the same way? Or is the fort up for grabs?
Erpobdelliforme
2018-08-02 12:45:00
Unknown:
I wanted to know, if collectively, the q4t at large believes that to be the correct clue. There is very little that the Q4T at large (whatever that is) believes collectively. And ultimately, it only matters what you believe. IMO, too many people are spending way too much time (or so it seems) trying to convince others of what they believe to be true, instead of just putting the information out there and letting everyone decide for themselves whether that information is useful.
In that spirit, "fairy secrets come in twos". Pear=Pearman/Pear=pair. FWIW.
jayheedan1
2018-08-02 13:50:00
Erpobdelliforme wrote::
I wanted to know, if collectively, the q4t at large believes that to be the correct clue.
There is very little that the Q4T at large (whatever that is) believes collectively. At Large:
2. as a whole; in general.
"there has been a loss of community values in society at large"
synonyms: as a whole, generally, in general
"society at large"
JoshCornell
2018-08-02 13:51:00
every clue has twofold meaning, the gold colour of the pear takes us very clearly to poe.
JoshCornell
2018-08-02 13:54:00
the other forts are implied in non visual ways. this puzzle has you following the path the cannons took from moultrie to wpg.
Erpobdelliforme
2018-08-02 14:07:00
Unknown:
At Large: Thank you, but I know what "at large" means. I'm just not sure how to apply it to this forum. Is it the people who are active now? Is it the people who were active recently, but no longer post. Is it everyone who has ever participated? Does it include lurkers? The point is the bigger the group, the less likely you are to get consensus. Which makes any question (not just yours) about what "people" believe somewhat pointless IMO.
Macfos
2018-08-02 18:48:00
JamesV wrote::
This one?
The book didn't have any information about these trees out front, what type, when they were planted, etc. James - Yes that is the one. On your image it is the big tree on the right side of the cover, not the little skinny ones. Apparently it is a red or Jordanian cypress. I can't remember. I will have to try to find the link again and post it.
If you are standing in front of the church, it is planted in the middle of the grassy area to the right of the entrance.
Regards,
Mac
graceandhayes
2018-08-09 14:03:00
I live in Mt Pleasant, SC and have been working on Image 2 and Verse 6 for a few months on and off since I saw the EU episode in January. Yes, I am one of those people who feel like they arrived at the party 30 years too late. I seem to have hit a roadblock in my research. I have read all the posts on Image 2 and Verse 6. I have read all the theories posted here and on The Secret wiki. I have physically visited many likely spots in Charleston and Sulllivan's Island. Like most of us I have found multiple spots that match some of the clues, but have failed to have the "a-ha" moment or find any convincing visual clues. Looking to collaborate with someone who is not already convinced they know the location of the casque, and is open minded and willing to consider all possible locations and solutions. Please don't reply by telling me to read your solve. Most likely I have already seen and read it. Since I am still hunting that should tell you your "solution" was not convincing enough for me. Since you are still reading the posts on this board, that tells me you are not totally convinced of your solve either. I'm not saying the casque isn't in WPG under the Moultrie statue, or buried in the garden next to the Ft Sumter House, near Osceola's grave at Ft Moultrie, or destroyed and no longer recoverable. I just have not seen enough links to the verse or image to convince me of any of the published locations or "solves". So, if you goal is to convince me of your solve, don't waste you time, I'm not interested. If you are interested in sharing ideas and thoughts, and collaborating to find a solution without guessing or assumptions, contact me. If you are in the Charleston area, that would be great. If not, I am willing to work with and help anyone trying to solve from afar. Thanks, Chris
Erpobdelliforme
2018-08-09 14:16:00
Unknown:
So, if you goal is to convince me of your solve, don't waste you time, Yeah, you're still going to get an earful from Josh. But there are at least a few people in your area who are working on this puzzle and maybe some of them will reach out to you. Collaboration is good.
Happy hunting.
drunknerds
2018-08-09 14:22:00
graceandhayes wrote::
I live in Mt Pleasant, SC and have been working on Image 2 and Verse 6 for a few months on and off since I saw the EU episode in January. Yes, I am one of those people who feel like they arrived at the party 30 years too late. I seem to have hit a roadblock in my research. I have read all the posts on Image 2 and Verse 6. I have read all the theories posted here and on The Secret wiki. I have physically visited many likely spots in Charleston and Sulllivan's Island. Like most of us I have found multiple spots that match some of the clues, but have failed to have the "a-ha" moment or find any convincing visual clues. Looking to collaborate with someone who is not already convinced they know the location of the casque, and is open minded and willing to consider all possible locations and solutions. Please don't reply by telling me to read your solve. Most likely I have already seen and read it. Since I am still hunting that should tell you your "solution" was not convincing enough for me. Since you are still reading the posts on this board, that tells me you are not totally convinced of your solve either. I'm not saying the casque isn't in WPG under the Moultrie statue, or buried in the garden next to the Ft Sumter House, near Osceola's grave at Ft Moultrie, or destroyed and no longer recoverable. I just have not seen enough links to the verse or image to convince me of any of the published locations or "solves". So, if you goal is to convince me of your solve, don't waste you time, I'm not interested. If you are interested in sharing ideas and thoughts, and collaborating to find a solution without guessing or assumptions, contact me. If you are in the Charleston area, that would be great. If not, I am willing to work with and help anyone trying to solve from afar. Thanks, Chris Welcome! I love that you did your research.
Have you tried the Facebook group devoted to Charleston? This forum here is intended for open sharing of ideas. If you have any, we’d love to hear them.
JoshCornell
2018-08-09 14:26:00
you should watch my video on youtube if you are unconvined its at fsab/fsah
seems bizarre he would include a random little garden in the painting, if it didnt have significance. lol but go wild the puzzle is large so theres lots of extraneous stuff to discover in charleston still.
graceandhayes
2018-08-09 16:49:00
Oh I have been following the exploits and postings of Josh and others for a few months. No offense, but my comment in my original post was meant primarily for you Josh. I also knew you couldn't resist a response, Josh. Everything going as expected at this point. LOL! I am not trying to offend Josh, or anyone else. My only comment to Josh and others - Stop trying to convince everyone you have solved it. If you are so sure, it shouldn't matter what anyone else thinks or says. You have stated you case for the location, now leave the rest of us alone. For those of us still searching. I have some ideas, but I am not great at organizing or presenting my thoughts in writing, and I am terrible at editing or highlighting things I think I see in the image. I guess I need some good photo editing software and a lesson on how to use it. I'll see what I can do on posting ideas or things I don't think have been mentioned yet.
maltedfalcon
2018-08-09 16:55:00
graceandhayes wrote::
Yes, I am one of those people who feel like they arrived at the party 30 years too late. I seem to have hit a roadblock in my research. I have read all the posts on Image 2 and Verse 6. I have read all the theories posted here and on The Secret wiki. I'm Sorry I totally missed your original post Welcome! you aren't late you are right on time!
I am so jealous, Charleston is such a beautiful area.
Erpobdelliforme
2018-08-09 17:13:00
Unknown:
Also, for what it's worth, the Charleston Facebook page for The Secret is a Josh-free zone. It also seems to be a content-free zone with only 5 posts in the last 30 says. Maybe some new blood will perk things up.
maltedfalcon
2018-08-09 17:36:00
Erpobdelliforme wrote::
It also seems to be a content-free zone with only 5 posts in the last 30 says. Maybe some new blood will perk things up.
graceandhayes
2018-08-09 18:18:00
I am also on the Facebook page for The Secret - Charleston, but as mentioned, not much activity there. Not much activity on the wiki either for Charleston. I think most on the wiki are convinced it is, or was, in WPG and no one is actively searching. Let me throw out a couple of things that bother me on the image, but I have not seen much discussion on. Maybe this will start some polite conversations, or an argument. LOL.
- The birthmark on the lion's forehead must be important, and like most, driving me crazy. WTF is that!
- The lion's left cheek, on the right in the image. Is it me or does anyone else see the head and neck of a horse maybe. The eye of the horse is the dark spot to the left of the lion's eye. The nose/snout extends toward the lion's nose under his eye. The hairs on the lions mane even appear to come out of the back of the horse's head like the mane on a horse. Its not exact, but there is something there. I say this because the two cheeks on the lion do not match.
- What is that to the right of the mask? Part of ships mast? Must be important, but what it it?
- What is the face behind this ships mast/ropes to the right of the mask?
- Willing to listen to any ideas on the fairy or her wings. This must have clues, but I have not seen anything solid on this.
- I think the branch is less significant than the needles on the branch. They seem to form shapes where they overlap. Triangles, X's or Roman Numeral 10's, there are clues in the needles I think. I should mention, the shape of the branches to the right of the pear reminds me of the Eye of Horus.
- The African mask. Any links to the shapes of the eyes? What are the broken bits in the eye sockets? The "h" or outline over the eyes that extends onto the map?
- The Ft Sumter mask/charm. Why is it not oriented correctly? On a map the long flat side of the fort faces SW, not N like shown in the image. What are the eyes, star, stripes, and mouth?
- The diamond. Why do the two triangles on either side face up and not towards the center of the stone? What do these represent? What is written at the bottom - 75, 73, 7S? What does it mean? The center of the diamond is an hourglass shape which reminds me of a miniature of the fairy's body. It even has triangles at the top facing each other similar to the fairy bikini top or the shapes formed by her crossed arms.
Ok, so that's a start. Looking forward to hearing what others think. Peace, Chris
graceandhayes
2018-08-09 18:25:00
Just a question. Is it appropriate to post thoughts and questions about Verse 6 here, or is there a Verse 6 thread I should post on?
maltedfalcon
2018-08-09 18:30:00
graceandhayes wrote::
I am also on the Facebook page for The Secret - Charleston, but as mentioned, not much activity there. Not much activity on the wiki either for Charleston. I think most on the wiki are convinced it is, or was, in WPG and no one is actively searching. Let me throw out a couple of things that bother me on the image, but I have not seen much discussion on. Maybe this will start some polite conversations, or an argument. LOL.
- The birthmark on the lion's forehead must be important, and like most, driving me crazy. WTF is that!
- The lion's left cheek, on the right in the image. Is it me or does anyone else see the head and neck of a horse maybe. The eye of the horse is the dark spot to the left of the lion's eye. The nose/snout extends toward the lion's nose under his eye. The hairs on the lions mane even appear to come out of the back of the horse's head like the mane on a horse. Its not exact, but there is something there. I say this because the two cheeks on the lion do not match.
- What is that to the right of the mask? Part of ships mast? Must be important, but what it it?
- What is the face behind this ships mast/ropes to the right of the mask?
- Willing to listen to any ideas on the fairy or her wings. This must have clues, but I have not seen anything solid on this.
- I think the branch is less significant than the needles on the branch. They seem to form shapes where they overlap. Triangles, X's or Roman Numeral 10's, there are clues in the needles I think. I should mention, the shape of the branches to the right of the pear reminds me of the Eye of Horus.
- The African mask. Any links to the shapes of the eyes? What are the broken bits in the eye sockets? The "h" or outline over the eyes that extends onto the map?
- The Ft Sumter mask/charm. Why is it not oriented correctly? On a map the long flat side of the fort faces SW, not N like shown in the image. What are the eyes, star, stripes, and mouth?
- The diamond. Why do the two triangles on either side face up and not towards the center of the stone? What do these represent? What is written at the bottom - 75, 73, 7S? What does it mean? The center of the diamond is an hourglass shape which reminds me of a miniature of the fairy's body. It even has triangles at the top facing each other similar to the fairy bikini top or the shapes formed by her crossed arms.
Ok, so that's a start. Looking forward to hearing what others think. Peace, Chris Hi Chris! From your username I thought you might be two people.
I am not active in the Charleston Search, but I am pretty sure there are quite a few people actively hunting there. I'm not sure they are even on q4t or FB
I will mention your questions if I chat with any of them.
Best of luck!
maltedfalcon
2018-08-09 18:31:00
graceandhayes wrote::
Just a question. Is it appropriate to post thoughts and questions about Verse 6 here, or is there a Verse 6 thread I should post on? yes there is a verse 6 thread.
JamesV
2018-08-09 21:35:00
graceandhayes wrote::
Please don't reply by telling me to read your solve. Most likely I have already seen and read it. Since I am still hunting that should tell you your "solution" was not convincing enough for me. But Chris, as I clearly stated in my "solution"...
I'm not as open minded on I2 as I was last year, but good on you for keeping at it-- these casques aren't found if they're still in the ground. Not currently "home" in Charleston at the moment, but would be happy to offer thoughts/opinions on any new theories.
graceandhayes
2018-08-10 12:39:00
Wanted to add a couple things I think I see in image 2 that I have not seen posted anywhere else. If it has I have missed it. I have shared this in a PM, but wanted to post here as well to get thoughts from others.
Does anyone else see a ship on the bottom left of the lion's mane? It appears to me to be the front of a wooden sailing ship with the bow pointed left and it seems to be sailing out from the shadow on the left of the lion's face. It is just below the sideways '33". In fact what most feel is a sideways number '33' I think is actually the sails of the ship, or it may be both, or it may be neither one. LOL. What most believe is a cross in the bottom left of the mane I think is actually the anchor for the ship. It appears to be hanging from the bow of the ship. I tried to attach an image, but I get a message "the board attachment quota has been reached". Let me know if there is a spot I can post if others can't see what I am seeing.
Also, the eyes of the African mask. I have searched everywhere for a similar shape, and hexagons are basically non-existent at every location I have been to. Lots of octagons, but no hexagons. I was doing some research on Post Office Park and the Old Post Office and I found a picture on Wikipedia that caught my eye. Go here,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_St ... h_Carolina
) and click on the top picture on the right side of the page to enlarge it. Then zoom in on the steeple of St Michael's Church on the left side of the picture. I think the arches at the top of the steeple match the arches on the African mask. The sky showing through the bottom of the arches with the railing balusters looks similar to the eyes on the mask with the lines below the eyes. The line in Verse 6 is, "Seen here by eyes of old". St Michael's Church is one of the oldest churches in Charleston, built in the 1750s. Are these the "eyes of old"? You can see the steeple from many places in lower downtown Charleston, but worth noting the angle is correct so you can see these "eyes" on the steeple from both Washington Park and Post Office Park.
WhiteRabbit
2018-08-20 18:22:00
In order to reconcile the Edwin debate, here's a crackpot theory that includes both.
This is a diamond puzzle; it's going to be a tricky one. Now, "...the Fairy Spirits of Africa...fluttered down, like a windfall of butterflies, far from the tribal warfare and slave traders, upon...the New World's eastern shore". So, should we look for their treasure somewhere like Charleston's Hampton Park, named after one of the biggest slaveholders for miles...? Or White Point Gardens, with its memorials to warfare...?
No, but further south, somewhere much more fitting to these fair folk; Savannah, Georgia.
(The change of coordinates can be done easily enough by digging out an 81 from somewhere.)
Here in the Savannah we find lions in abundance - four of them guard the base of Oglethorpe's statue in Chippewa Square, with "arms extended" (coat of arms, that is).
Oglethorpe is a philanthropist, anti-slavery and general all round good egg. Edwin Booth played at the neighbouring Savannah Theatre several times, and as an added bonus it's also next to the birthplace of Juliette Gordon Low, founder of the Girl Scouts of Lake Park fame. Because...fairy secrets come in twos...
...yes, I appreciate that there are numerous clues that lead directly to Charleston. But it's all misdirection, you see, and the lion's mask is slipping...
phinetic
2018-08-22 02:07:00
You need to come back to the conclusion that it’s possible that the lions main (no pun intended) symbolism could be the lions MANE and that the lions nose represents the MAINE capstan that was removed from white point garden.
WhiteRabbit
2018-08-22 02:33:00
...probably, although in seriousness I did wonder whether BP would base clues for the casque sites around military figures and hardware, as has often come up in the past, based on the central themes of the book. I've also been hoping for a proper human translation of the
arms extended / bar that binds
Japanese hint, because I think it might rule out solutions based on sand bars and cannons...
To find the keys is your reward
For Fairy, peace the real accord.
phinetic
2018-08-22 12:18:00
Additionally I think in both of the actual found casques, none of them have been in different states than what was initially outlined in the paintings. I can appreciate the work and thought, but you’re way too far down the rabbit hole
WhiteRabbit
2018-08-22 12:32:00
...yeah, wasn't being entirely serious there...
JoshCornell
2018-08-24 01:10:00
there are lions literally everywhere....everywhere. the guy at the end of my old street has two big ass lions lol.
JoshCornell
2018-08-24 01:12:00
WhiteRabbit wrote::
...probably, although in seriousness I did wonder whether BP would base clues for the casque sites around military figures and hardware, as has often come up in the past, based on the central themes of the book. I've also been hoping for a proper human translation of the
arms extended / bar that binds
Japanese hint, because I think it might rule out solutions based on sand bars and cannons...
To find the keys is your reward
For Fairy, peace the real accord. i already told everyone this...the first one leads to #19 in the e african studies collection...its the bar that binds WATER.
the two arms extended are the shadow of the obelisk sundial and the cannon, the treasure is gone. i went there and dug. it was in the triangle shaped sand garden beside fort sumter association building.
a billion times over...thats the spot clearly.
funsun
2018-08-31 05:38:00
Song
I see 2 turtle doves (in the butterfly wings) and a partridge perhaps in a PEAR tree.
12 days of Christmas Song. (Cross in the Lion's hair could be Christmas.)
I need opinions.
funsun
2018-08-31 07:17:00
hardatlurk wrote::
Has there been any discussion of the woman's feet in the image? They look alittle weird and are silhouetted...maybe their silhouette matches a landmark or part of a statue? The feet are crossed like Jesus on the cross along with the bottom cloth. The arms form a t cross.
funsun
2018-08-31 16:36:00
The woman's feet are highlighted in blue. They say that the highlighted areas are map outlines.
Merlot Brougham
2018-08-31 16:55:00
funsun wrote::
The woman's feet are highlighted in blue. They say that the highlighted areas are map outlines.
MrBackstop
2018-08-31 19:37:00
funsun wrote::
The woman's feet are highlighted in blue. They say that the highlighted areas are map outlines. Hello funsun
The blue highlights can mean a number of things from image to image. Many searchers think they are important while others think they are just a creative part of JJP's artwork style. I personally see the blue highlights as indicating certain keys to the puzzle or verse.
Some highlighted parts of an image might be a confirmation of a waymarker that leads us to the treasure spot. In Image 4 the cup is highlighted (fountain in the Italian Garden next to the Greek Cultural Garden) which is a waymarker letting us know we are in the right area.
In Chicago, see how the lady with the fairy wings from the Fountain of Great Lakes is highlighted in blue while the Chicago Water tower is not? This is telling us that the Fountain of Great Lakes is in the neighborhood or near the casque in this case while the Chicago Water Tower is just informing us of the City we are to search.
Then there is Image 9 with no blue highlights.
As for Image 2, I believe the blue highlights below her feet appear to be a path to take to go in the direction of the casque.
So while these blue highlights may not be maps they can certainly help us along the route.
funsun
2018-09-02 01:04:00
Mr. Backstop. Thank you for your worthy input.
Merlot Brougham
2018-09-02 03:19:00
funsun wrote::
Mr. Backstop. Thank you for your worthy input. Again(!), I believe that to mostly be nonsense. Palencar uses the same technique throughout his art, and the blue highlights that appear in both solved images did nothing to assist in the solves.
JoshCornell
2018-09-02 04:30:00
i still think it possibly denotes a water reading of the clue...its def not map, cause there are loads of map clues that are not highlighted in blue. see mtl, roanoake, etc.
MrBackstop
2018-09-02 12:55:00
Merlot Brougham wrote::
Again(!), I believe that to mostly be nonsense. No problem funsun
Merlot, I know you do. That's what makes these puzzles so entertaining. You think the highlights are simply artistic style and ignore them, that's why I wrote what I wrote. I see them as quite helpful like in the two that have been found.
Merlot Brougham
2018-09-02 15:44:00
MrBackstop wrote::
No problem funsun
Merlot, I know you do. That's what makes these puzzles so entertaining. You think the highlights are simply artistic style and ignore them, that's why I wrote what I wrote. I see them as quite helpful like in the two that have been found. I definitely did/do not ignore them. I find that comment to be pretty patronizing. I formed an opinion about them after taking time and considering the available information. I could easily say "That's what makes these puzzles so entertaining. You think the evidence is simply subjective and choose to ignore it"
In Image 5, the entire head and shoulders of the subject are surrounded by the halo. In image 4, the entire centaur has a halo. I do not accept the tail to be any kind of shoehorned map. But what if it is? The centaurs legs/back/arms, all with blue halo are insignificant as far as I can tell. I also cannot find any of the blue aura to be associated with any important hint in Image 5 (Chicago), unless where it stylistically has to extend up to include the fairy, but that's being generous.
What I do find is Palencar using this technique throughout his art to the point that it cannot possibly be used as a hint to zero in on anything. Surely something in some image with a halo may be important, but that's a matter of statistical probability since there are auras everywhere.
In either case "The blue halo around X, led us to Y and this was very important to our solve" was never uttered by anyone involved in finding either of the two retrieved casks.
MrBackstop
2018-09-04 13:04:00
Sorry Merlot That was not my intent.
funsun
2018-09-30 03:12:00
JoshCornell wrote::
i still think it possibly denotes a water reading of the clue...its def not map, cause there are loads of map clues that are not highlighted in blue. see mtl, roanoake, etc. @josh Cornell Hey I was just reading that this was from thee Josh Cornell. I watched some of your videos on you tube. I think they are good for a beginner like myself to watch to help disect what to look for in a puzzle. Thanks for your comments on my posts.
JoshCornell
2018-10-01 20:20:00
ha. no worries. got big news in store.
Spiritr
2018-10-03 20:10:00
I want to know what the yellow fruit mean
JoshCornell
2018-10-03 20:22:00
it takes us to the myths of prometheus bound/judgement of paris...as prometheus threw the golden pear from olympus to earth, at the feet of the three goddesses...and if you doubt me, consider how paris was selected to make the choice...and you'll have your confirmation
Spiritr
2018-10-03 21:02:00
is this the only image that contains a fruit then?
JoshCornell
2018-10-03 21:22:00
no. sf has a strawberry.
Spiritr
2018-10-04 03:28:00
ok, so a golden pear and a blue strawberry, you think there's a connection?
JoshCornell
2018-10-04 22:42:00
well, the only kind of strawberry that has a blue variant is the "woodland aka alpine strawberry" which is part of the rose family...and strawberries ripen for harvest in june (the first berry of the year...im a huge forager)...so there's that.
JoshCornell
2018-10-04 22:48:00
theres both a golden apple and golden pear in the charleston image, the apple is on the african mask, you can see the stem coming up from the brow area above where the nose would be located pretty easily.
MERLIN
2018-10-04 22:57:00
Come on guys....don't you see it - alice in wonderland - magic mushrooms - purple haze.....he's literally putting the cask in your hands.
gManTexas
2018-11-30 16:57:00
Here is Revision 4 of my proposed Charleston Theory.
Let's talk about methodology, shall we?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/pqkh6j2cs89ph ... 4.pdf?dl=0
drunknerds
2018-12-01 18:27:00
This image always struck me as less developed than the other 11. It's not in a particular room, there's no link between the items in the image.
Think that could be intentional? If so... how?
gManTexas
2018-12-01 19:33:00
drunknerds wrote::
This image always struck me as less developed than the other 11. It's not in a particular room, there's no link between the items in the image.
Think that could be intentional? If so... how? Possibly because most of the stuff is historical references and no longer exist. The park is mostly devoid of physical markers.
JamesV
2018-12-02 03:19:00
I actually also looked into Hampton Park when I joined the hunt last year-- that area's gone through a lot of changes in recent decades, but back in the 1980s it would've been a dark, secluded place, perfect for BP to have buried a casque at night. I didn't personally find any clues which might indicate that a casque is buried there, though.
Fun fact: the late, great Pat Conroy, a Lowcountry author, included a few scenes in his novel "The Lords of Discipline" (1980) which mentioned how Hampton Park used to be home to a small zoo... including a lion. Oddly enough, the book also had a scene which discussed how Chief Osceola's body was stolen from Fort Moultrie in the dead of night...
gManTexas
2018-12-02 03:36:00
JamesV wrote::
I actually also looked into Hampton Park when I joined the hunt last year-- that area's gone through a lot of changes in recent decades, but back in the 1980s it would've been a dark, secluded place, perfect for BP to have buried a casque at night. I didn't personally find any clues which might indicate that a casque is buried there, though.
Fun fact: the late, great Pat Conroy, a Lowcountry author, included a few scenes in his novel "The Lords of Discipline" (1980) which mentioned how Hampton Park used to be home to a small zoo... including a lion. Oddly enough, the book also had a scene which discussed how Chief Osceola's body was stolen from Fort Moultrie in the dead of night... There are no tangible clues in Hampton Park, unless you count the Wayside Inn and the Fountain, maybe the bandstand.
UnprovenFact
2018-12-11 13:19:00
Hey premiernc, Not sure if anyone active here lives there, but I've been all over that area, so I am pretty familiar with it. Post your theory and we'll see where it takes you.
Thanks!
Macfos
2018-12-11 13:51:00
I am in Charleston and active in the search. PM me if you don't want to post to the thread yet.
Regards,
Mac
UnprovenFact
2018-12-11 14:10:00
My apologies. We went almost two months without a Charleston post, so I had been playing around with New York and San Francisco. (And then there was the JC debacle.) I guess I just forgot about our Charlestonians. Sorry about that. I went back a few months, and I recalled actually having a conversation with graceandhayes who is also nearby down there. Hopefully, we can get this going again!
Thanks!
strike13
2018-12-11 14:37:00
premiernc wrote::
Anyone live in Charleston?
I have an alternative solve that works with the verse and the image. It is not in whitepoint park and I can point to a very small area for the probing.
Let me know. Thx a million. Wow, Charleston AND NYC!!
EvelynMDog
2018-12-20 14:28:00
Tried sharing the attached via Facebook and email with burnstyle and James Vachowski yesterday.
Not good with technology and loathe social media.
Facebook account got disabled and no response from email.
Thought I'd try to post a link instead.
Link is to a *.docx file which I believe lists around 5 'new' insights into the Charleston casque location
《Snip》
Link removed on request.
If the link from my google drive is not functional, I would appreciate some guidance on how to post
JamesV
2018-12-21 08:04:00
Hi EvelynMDog, welcome to Q4T! Sorry, I'm a little behind on emails at the moment-- I'm still on the other side of the world, my day job is a little busy right now, plus I'm putting the finishing touches on my latest book, due out in February. And oh yeah, Christmas!
I'll be sure to keep everyone posted if there's any kind of movement from NPS on my I2/V5 "solution" -- the contact I worked with seemed very open-minded, so I'm convinced that some sort of proper dig will happen... someday. Please be safe with your own explorations in the meantime-- Sullivan's Island PD doesn't mess around!
Hope everyone is enjoying their holidays!
Macfos
2018-12-21 15:15:00
EvelynMDog, check your PMs.
Regards,
Mac
Eastcoast
2019-03-01 13:39:00
Just an odd coincidence, picked up period encyclopedias and when looking through "D" pamphlet fell out for animal park in Charleston. The books were 1978 edition, links should be public , cheers
Exterior
https://www.instagram.com/p/Bud6hcSgry3/
Interior
https://www.instagram.com/p/Bud6jgHgRaq/
gManTexas
2019-03-01 13:48:00
Eastcoast wrote::
Just an odd coincidence, picked up period encyclopedias and when looking through "D" pamphlet fell out for animal park in Charleston. The books were 1978 edition, links should be public , cheers
Exterior
https://www.instagram.com/p/Bud6hcSgry3/
Interior
https://www.instagram.com/p/Bud6jgHgRaq/ Nice find, thanks for sharing.
erexere
2019-03-01 14:19:00
Ooh, nice. Please share more from these encyclopedias in as much as they might apply to each of the puzzles.
dizalot
2019-03-19 17:22:00
I noticed something on the image and I could not find any reference on the board so I thought I'd share. If you look under the pear there is what appears to be a stand of some kind reminds me of a water tank but I can't find one like this in Charleston.
Eastcoast
2019-03-19 18:39:00
erexere wrote::
Ooh, nice. Please share more from these encyclopedias in as much as they might apply to each of the puzzles. sure, looking for "May 1913" just something that from translation i think is discoverable, World Book Encyclopedia 1978
Still looking for a period dictionary
UnprovenFact
2019-03-21 15:08:00
dizalot wrote:: Hey dizalot,
So the Pear… Some have speculated that it is a representation of the gold ball one might find at the top of a flagpole like the one found in WPG or at one of the forts. I also read a post comparing it to a weather vane like the one atop St. Michael’s Church across from Washington Square Park. Once upon a time, I thought it was a golf ball on a tee. If you head over to Mount Pleasant, there is a golf course at Patriot’s Point. Using the branch as a map, the pear would be about where the golf course is. That was back when I thought “Or on the eighth a scene…” might refer to something you can see from the 8th hole. I left that theory there and played through. Others are dead set on the pear referencing the old Pearman bridge. So, to answer your question, no one really knows for sure.
-I think one creative mind even joked that the pear was food for the lion. That didn’t go over too well.-
Choice
2019-03-21 16:26:00
I've noticed a lot of Salvador Dali influence in JJP's works. Here's another one, most likely Civil War reference:
Salvador Dali “Face of War”
JamesV
2019-04-23 00:38:00
More activity to report from the Charleston search, although it looks like the news reporters were unclear on the Image/Verse pairing:
https://www.postandcourier.com/news/dis ... sbPmKSSk5E
I'm still not budging from my own I2/V5 "solution" for Fort Moultrie, but there's a small part of my soul that's pulling for Josh Cornell to find one in White Point Gardens...
UnprovenFact
2019-04-23 12:57:00
This is great news! Maybe the treasure will finally be unearthed, and a lot of questions could finally be answered! Although, it sounds more like they just want everyone to stop contacting them for permission to dig, and this is going to be the one and only last chance. My guess is, there will be some GPR, a little probing, and finally a hole or two dug in areas that wouldn’t necessarily disturb the historic site but would suffice as being “allowed to dig”. Treasure or no treasure, they are going to put it to bed… for good.
Best of Luck to the team!
burnstyle
2019-04-23 23:37:00
UnprovenFact wrote::
So the Pear… Some have speculated that it is a representation of the gold ball one might find at the top of a flagpole like the one found in WPG or at one of the forts. Most people seem to think it represents the old pearman bridge near WPG.
Choice
2019-04-24 01:06:00
Since both pear and flagpole's ball (minute hand of the clock) are hanging off the branch then maybe they are one of the same.
The flagpole's shadow (hour hand) is at 4 O'clock.
The clock is hanging off the branch by the minute hand's tip (flagpole's ball) and pointing to 12 O'clock position.
The pear ball is hanging upside down off the pole meaning it's pointing to 6 O'clock direction.
This means turn the clock 180 degrees.
Then the pole's shadow (hour hand) would be pointing to 10 O'clock position, pointing in direction of white point garden.
UnprovenFact
2019-04-24 13:58:00
burnstyle wrote::
Most people seem to think it represents the old pearman bridge near WPG. Yes, this is kind of going against the grain here, much like using a verse that is not Verse 6… but until we really
know
what the pear represents, it could be anything. I think if it was only intended to reference the bridge, it would only need to look like a pear - not a shiny gold ball with a base, perhaps a pole, which extends down into the flower. Also, if it was a reference to the old Pearman Bridge, I would have thought it to be more of an obvious reference. If it had a little man painted inside it, I would absolutely agree Pear + Man = Pearman… Bridge. Much like the Mill(stone) + Walk(ing cane) + Key = Milwaukee. Maybe they didn’t want to use that method twice. I am not the artist or the author, so I really can’t say for certain what it is. I am just throwing out another possibility.
While we are here, what if it really is the gold ball atop the flagpole in WPG? And somehow, the Ft. Sumter face-clock is the key? The eyes are the two cannon on either side of the path, the flagpole is the flagpole, the star and stripes are the flag, the ‘mouth’ is the sewer grate, etc. Maybe the flagpole casts a shadow on the dig spot? Possible?... yes. Likely?... ok, I’ll keep working on it.
I also wondered if the Hobson monument was the “White stone closest..” But that is another issue.
Dwill337
2019-04-30 16:29:00
Has anyone found out when the filming/dig date is? Live around the corner & would Love to be preset when/if any thing is uncovered. Personally I'm torn on whether I want it found or not. I love the rabbit hole of wondering & linking Charleston landmarks to this puzzle. On the other hand; closure would be good. I think there's great possibility it is in a few lesser visited parks in this city. Huge fan of the Chalmers, Marion Sq, and Hampton theories.
Also, very very well done to JamesV- one of the best solves I've ever came across
jamesrogers2
2019-05-04 03:01:00
The pear is in reference to Richmond
Pear
son Hobson, who had the USS Hobson named after him. A memorial to the USS Hobson is in Charleston, SC in White Point Garden.
Here's my Image 2 solution that leads to the top of the shadow of the Charleston, SC Hobson Memorial on April 26 at 4pm (sundial time). What do you think?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lxkCnE ... sp=sharing
Dwill337
2019-05-04 03:38:00
jamesrogers2 wrote::
The pear is in reference to Richmond
Pear
son Hobson, who had the USS Hobson named after him. A memorial to the USS Hobson is in Charleston, SC in White Point Garden.
Here's my Image 2 solution that leads to the top of the shadow of the Charleston, SC Hobson Memorial on April 26 at 4pm (sundial time). What do you think?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lxkCnE ... sp=sharing Yessir always believed it had to do with the sundial if at all in WPG. 4pm shadow at the palm. Sent on- hoping to meet up.
JamesV
2019-05-04 07:57:00
I don't know... I've read a few other "sun-shadow" theories before, but they've never really made sense to me. Yes, that might have been the way the "Masquerade" treasure was supposedly found, but I'm having trouble seeing it with "The Secret."
If BP really designed the clues so that a casque's exact spot could only be found at a certain time of day, on one particular day of the year, then why in the world would he ever have been afraid that all of the treasures would be found within a matter of months?
Erpobdelliforme
2019-05-04 16:53:00
Unknown:
then why in the world would he ever have been afraid that all of the treasures would be found within a matter of months? Quite simply, he wasn't. What he said was that if the puzzles proved to be too easy, and they were solved in a couple of months, his publisher would be mad at him or words to that effect. I suspect that he knew he had created a puzzle that would take some time to solve completely, and as we continue to find out, he was correct.
UnprovenFact
2019-05-04 19:27:00
If you use the Hobson Monument, you may not need a specific day at a specific hour to create a shadow marking the spot. (And what if it is too cloudy on that particular day and time?)
One could just use the arrow in the base of the monument as the direction marker - regardless of the weather. If the clue really is 12 paces from the monument, just follow the arrow's direction.
jamesrogers2
2019-05-05 00:41:00
UnprovenFact wrote::
If you use the Hobson Monument, you may not need a specific day at a specific hour to create a shadow marking the spot. (And what if it is too cloudy on that particular day and time?)
One could just use the arrow in the base of the monument as the direction marker - regardless of the weather. If the clue really is 12 paces from the monument, just follow the arrow's direction. Great point! And that would explain why you are to start on the west side of the monument (where the line for the arrow starts). I appreciate the feedback!
TreasureBloke
2019-05-07 19:22:00
Seeing as Charleston is about to be dug up soon I will post my analysis.
Fair warning: I am using these videos to help get a job also, I do put out for potential sponsorship. Please don't repoint that out it is free information I am tending out.
It is safe for work, I intend to keep them clean.
I also overlayed some 'fanart' over images not to show the original art in the video. It does cover up a bit of my line drawings but I was in a rush plus I have family members who are severely ill to attend to.
Also the production quality is not slick, but I want to keep it somewhat home garage in feel.
25 minute vid:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIriklgLBMg
Criticism is welcome. Be kind.
XeroDM
2019-05-08 04:17:00
TreasureBloke wrote::
25 minute vid:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIriklgLBMg
Criticism is welcome. Be kind. Looks like you've put some work into it...
Have you looked into the history of the park and elements? Most parks we're dealing with have had major changes throughout the last 30+ years. Much caution needs to be made to looking at a park as it is today, but not thinking about how the park(s) were in the early 1980's. More importantly, muddy patches come and go, and trees grow and are removed. 35 years will allow a fair amount of tree growth, so the landscape will be vastly different than it was a while ago. Even considering a tree's shadow or a muddy patch is shaky at best.
As for the rest, it's all very vague, with lots of possibilities (i.e. the eyes of the Fort Sumter could have been lamp posts, man hole covers, etc.), the "shadow" of the flagpole was assumed to be at 6pm (downwards). If we assume that Preiss wanted us to find the treasure, we can assume that there are possibilities, but as we work through the puzzle, some "paths" along the solve will be negated due to that possibility being wrong. If there weren't red herring possibilities, they'd have been found by now. Essentially, when you're on the right path, everything else will not make sense or be less likely to be correct, and the vagueness will disappear. I liken it to someone telling you that a treasure is in a large field. Vague. Difficult to dig up. Fine if you don't want people to dig it up, but not if you do. If you are then told that it's in a corner, then the bulk of the field is taken out. No matter what else is said, we know we need to be in a corner. Still too vague though... which corner, how far from the corner, etc. And the refinement goes on, and we eventually come to a point that is accurate. Accurate being the key word. The casque is less than 1 foot square, so the end point needs to be pretty small to ensure that we get to 2-4 foot square as an end point. Or else... buy a backhoe and start levelling city parks to 3 foot deep to cover all bases...
It might be a good exercise for you to pick Hampton Park, do some reearch and redo your same theory on that park. If you come up with a point that you think is correct, you're still too vague because you can't rule out all other places in Charleston... That's what I have been doing... It shows how vague and loose your theories are...
Keep hunting!
TreasureBloke
2019-05-09 16:25:00
XeroDM wrote::
Looks like you've put some work into it...
Have you looked into the history of the park and elements? Most parks we're dealing with have had major changes throughout the last 30+ years. Much caution needs to be made to looking at a park as it is today, but not thinking about how the park(s) were in the early 1980's. More importantly, muddy patches come and go, and trees grow and are removed. 35 years will allow a fair amount of tree growth, so the landscape will be vastly different than it was a while ago. Even considering a tree's shadow or a muddy patch is shaky at best.
As for the rest, it's all very vague, with lots of possibilities (i.e. the eyes of the Fort Sumter could have been lamp posts, man hole covers, etc.), the "shadow" of the flagpole was assumed to be at 6pm (downwards). If we assume that Preiss wanted us to find the treasure, we can assume that there are possibilities, but as we work through the puzzle, some "paths" along the solve will be negated due to that possibility being wrong. If there weren't red herring possibilities, they'd have been found by now. Essentially, when you're on the right path, everything else will not make sense or be less likely to be correct, and the vagueness will disappear. I liken it to someone telling you that a treasure is in a large field. Vague. Difficult to dig up. Fine if you don't want people to dig it up, but not if you do. If you are then told that it's in a corner, then the bulk of the field is taken out. No matter what else is said, we know we need to be in a corner. Still too vague though... which corner, how far from the corner, etc. And the refinement goes on, and we eventually come to a point that is accurate. Accurate being the key word. The casque is less than 1 foot square, so the end point needs to be pretty small to ensure that we get to 2-4 foot square as an end point. Or else... buy a backhoe and start levelling city parks to 3 foot deep to cover all bases...
It might be a good exercise for you to pick Hampton Park, do some reearch and redo your same theory on that park. If you come up with a point that you think is correct, you're still too vague because you can't rule out all other places in Charleston... That's what I have been doing... It shows how vague and loose your theories are...
Keep hunting! Well in the video I mention the replacement of the capstan so yes I did look at the history of the park.
I have had to rush this video out. And there are some spaces that I indicate. And I do give precise measurements in terms of meterage however. Also some of the lines are accurate and some are general. The general ones relate to the ' beside '. Remember without being there with some equipment it can be hard to place at exact locations. Also Remember that that park is a big space narrowing it down to a few reasonable patches not too bad. Remember you can multiple probe an area and search down and borescope.
Multiple meanings are possible in the verses. Sometimes they are meant I feel. Sometimes they are a subjective coincidence. I present them all for people to consider.
I have to do a short follow up video as I've had another epiphany. I am on the right track though in thid vid.
UnprovenFact
2019-05-10 01:02:00
Missed it by THAT much...
It appears White Point Garden has been dug...for the first, and last, time.
Where the sandy path was once hard-packed, it is loose and appears freshly tilled. Where once there weren't holes, there appears to now be. The remaining depression leaves one wondering if an object has been removed.
I guess we will have to wait and see.
burnstyle
2019-05-10 01:30:00
UnprovenFact wrote::
Missed it by THAT much...
It appears White Point Garden has been dug...for the first, and last, time.
Where the sandy path was once hard-packed, it is loose and appears freshly tilled. Where once there weren't holes, there appears to now be. The remaining depression leaves one wondering if an object has been removed.
I guess we will have to wait and see. Soooooo many diggers went down there last weekend to watch the show. If something had been found you would know.
TreasureBloke
2019-05-10 02:02:00
UnprovenFact wrote::
Missed it by THAT much...
It appears White Point Garden has been dug...for the first, and last, time.
Where the sandy path was once hard-packed, it is loose and appears freshly tilled. Where once there weren't holes, there appears to now be. The remaining depression leaves one wondering if an object has been removed.
I guess we will have to wait and see. Sandy path?
With the epiphany that I have had over the last couple of days I'm thinking under the gnarly branch tip center screen also the nexus of lines:
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.7698338 ... 312!8i6656
Or possibly:
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.7698339 ... 312!8i6656
The sort of vertical area strip where it is a bit sandy as that was the nexus of lines again.
Was another tempter for me under the branch due to the first part of my latest epiphany:
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.7698113 ... 312!8i6656
I sort of moused over those first two areas in this post toward the end of the video but the first link I have tied to more meaning recently.
Is sandy path on the opposite side of the tree in the last link near Jasper?
Post google map views of the areas disturbed like I did.
Also come to think of it Josh Gates went to the artist exhibition in Ohio and probably showed him the cask if they found it for dramatic effect .
maltedfalcon
2019-05-10 03:53:00
TreasureBloke wrote::
With the epiphany that I have had over the last couple of days I'm thinking under the gnarly branch tip . while rates are different for every tree,
a live oak branch can gain 24 inches or more in a single growing season,
You do realize that the casque was buried 38 years ago...
24" x 38 years... 76 feet of growth....
2 category 4 hurricanes
and at least 5 tropical storms....
That you are considering "Under the gnarly branch tip""
The trees you are looking at really look nothing like they did in 1981
they have undoubtedly been pruned cultivated,trimmed and sometimes even replaced.
TreasureBloke
2019-05-10 03:59:00
maltedfalcon wrote::
while rates are different for every tree,
a live oak branch can gain 24 inches or more in a single growing season,
You do realize that the casque was buried 38 years ago...
24" x 38 years... 76 feet of growth....
2 category 4 hurricanes
and at least 5 tropical storms....
That you are considering "Under the gnarly branch tip""
The trees you are looking at really look nothing like they did in 1981
they have undoubtedly been pruned cultivated,trimmed and sometimes even replaced. Sort of, it was merely a convenient way to say where it was.
maltedfalcon
2019-05-18 02:55:00
Erpobdelliforme wrote::
Quite simply, he wasn't. What he said was that if the puzzles proved to be too easy, and they were solved in a couple of months, his publisher would be mad at him or words to that effect. I suspect that he knew he had created a puzzle that would take some time to solve completely, and as we continue to find out, he was correct. Hate to jump back in time like this but I missed something the first time around
"his publisher" Who would that be? He was the publisher. Bantam was just the contracted printer....
Do you know how exactly he worded it ? I can't find it.
Erpobdelliforme
2019-05-18 19:13:00
Unknown:
Do you know how exactly he worded it ? I can't find it. I couldn't find it either, which is why I said "words to that effect". The implication, as I recall, was that there were others who would be adversely affected by weak sales if the puzzles were solved too quickly and that he was afraid of letting them down. However, as I said, I do not think for one moment that he shared that concern, and he never said that the puzzle was easy. Just that some are easy and some are hard. And that he expected at least one treasure to be found within 30 days.
dosethree
2019-05-20 12:57:00
Erpobdelliforme
2019-05-20 16:41:00
Thanks, but that's not the article that I was thinking about. Still, this one mentions the "front money from his publishers" so perhaps those were the people that he was referring to in the other article. The people who would be mad at him.
Then there is this:
"Preiss says some of the puzzles are easy, and some are hard. He expects at least one treasure to be unearthed within 30 days.", which fits the narrative.
And then this:
"Others, of course, may never be found.", which does not.
Interestingly, neither is a direct quote from Preiss and while I'm sure he said the first , I really doubt that he said the second. I mean, if you are trying to sell a book, telling potential readers that some of the puzzles can not be solved isn't the smartest marketing strategy.
WilliamTater
2019-07-18 23:14:00
macfos asked to post this...
WilliamTater
2019-07-19 00:00:00
two
Macfos
2019-07-31 18:28:00
Thanks Tater!
Regards,
Mac