MERLIN
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_Times_Come_Again_No_More ?
Foster = Foster Farms Chicken?
Good song that describes welfare system.
Oh damn, Welfare Island again!
Part 1 of 3 — search “Image 12/Verse 10-South Brooklyn” to find all parts.
MERLIN
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_Times_Come_Again_No_More ?
Foster = Foster Farms Chicken?
Good song that describes welfare system.
Oh damn, Welfare Island again!
davinci4
Just curious from the forum. Has this area (South Shore Park at Oliver Street) been photographed or explored extensively? Anyone familiar with that area or live close by? The wooded area on the east side of the v would be interesting to look at.
As mentioned before, I have. The Oliver St idea is from a long time ago for me. I abandoned it and didn’t present it then because the area didn’t seem to work. Everything park related is West of Oliver St. Also that V is huge. Where’s the middle? Digging in a wooded area is going to be near impossible based on how many tree roots are in some seemingly open areas.
I would imagine with so many theories in that area it’s been walked a fair amount by others as well.
You should def nip down there and walk shore park and promenade, though. Interesting area. And you’ll definitely get a much better feel for what makes the most sense down there as opposed to virtual walk throughs.
idyl
Maybe I missed this, but which Hamilton signs were in Owl’s Head and the north end of Shore Park?
The theory about that is that since the park is right on the Belt parkway, you can see the exit signs on the pkway. One of which is Ft. Hamilton exit. Other then that, there should be no signs near Owl’s head or North parts of the park about Hamilton that I can remember.
davinci4
‘The v is the key.’ I propose the following criteria:
-v needs to run in N-S direction.
-adjacent dig spot approximately 50 feet away from middle of one branch
-can walk 22 steps from either branch as long as one is walking east
-dig spot should ‘say something’. Vague I know. But feel like the spot should be at a wall or gate or be designated by difference in terrain.
I would 100% agree with everything you said here.
davinci4
I was thinking about something from a previous post (I apologize, I forgot whom). They pointed out the lack of proper street names (mostly numbered) that line South Shore Park. I thought this fact might be something Preiss could have used to point to a specific cask location. Also consider the lack of monuments and plaques in South Shore Park. It would be hard to provide a precise location without offering us something unique.
The list of streets with non-numbers:
-Bay Ridge Ave/Parkway
-Mackay
-Oliver
-Ridge
Interestingly, a parking lot (“cars abound”) starts at Oliver at this point in the park.
With regards to Dickens, I encourage people to look back in the forum. This is not a new idea and was theorized well before the Japanese hints came out. The Japanese hint may have further solidified it for some
.
Prhabbot thank you for that hint. ..I do think the v is on a large scale given we are told to walk to the middle of one branch
I bet the other time Dickens was mentioned was in the Lower Manhattan/Battery park theories. Even though, I still have the Dickens theory, with a passion. It is creative to use Oliver st. to support it, but I still would have no clue as to why the natives would still speak about Dickens, especially when thinking about the word still, as if they have always spoke about him. I totally understand your logic behind it but it makes zero sense to me. We are just going to have to agree to disagree with that one.
Also, I employ anyone and everyone to check the translation for themselves on the Japanese clues. I do think that a few words get lost in translation. Nothing crucial but simple things. For example, when I ran it thorough 3 different translation programs, 2 of them said, “he is a chicken.” I am just assuming that since Japanese is so different from English that some words can be interpreted different ways when trying to make a accurate translation.
I ran with the “he is a chicken” and looked up famous names of chicken characters around that time, such as Cornelius (the Kellogs mascot) or foghorn leghorn, something in that realm. When doing that and cross referencing Brooklyn, I came up with Kennedy Chicken. Seems to make more sense that the Natives would still be talking about JFK after his assassination, especially since many places around adopted his name to honor him. I especially like the fact that the sign near the Hamilton sign says Kennedy airport rather then JFK.
Plus, let me just throw this out there. ” The natives still speak of him of hard word in 3 vols.” Is it that the natives still speak of “him of hard word in 3 vols” or they still speak of him in 3 vols.? Is the person’s description him of hard word in 3 vols. or are the natives still speaking about him in 3 vols.?
davinci4
‘The v is the key.’ I propose the following criteria:
-v needs to run in N-S direction.
-adjacent dig spot approximately 50 feet away from middle of one branch
-can walk 22 steps from either branch as long as one is walking east
-dig spot should ‘say something’. Vague I know. But feel like the spot should be at a wall or gate or be designated by difference in terrain.
I know the area in front of the HS has been renovated but doesn’t rule it out. And there definitely other v’s in the area which could also fit. Feel like there could be another clue here that would eliminate ambiguity, hence my excitement of the possibility of “85 st.” being hidden in the painting.
Lets say between the high school and Owl’s head park, there has to only be about 10 V shaped paths.
And I know someone before was commenting about the shape of the dress being Manhattan (which would be a horrible drawing of Manhattan). A portion of the bottom of her dress matches very well to the shape of shore park from Owl’s head to about 74th or so.
davinci4
‘The v is the key.’ I propose the following criteria:
-v needs to run in N-S direction.
-adjacent dig spot approximately 50 feet away from middle of one branch
-can walk 22 steps from either branch as long as one is walking east
-dig spot should ‘say something’. Vague I know. But feel like the spot should be at a wall or gate or be designated by difference in terrain.
So you don’t think that upon finding Him of Hard word you take 22 east steps or more?
And then from the middle of one branch of the v (that you have now reached) you look down at simple roots?
V has to be a path?
I personally don’t love these constraints.
davinci4
That’s good. That’s really good. Actually much better fit than lower Manhattan, especially if you use Shore Road and bay ridge parkway as your verticles. Nice observation!…if you haven’t yet, take a look at the aerial imagery website provided by Kang. The v’s were far more defined back then.
So lets say this is all true and spot on, now what? What will tie everything to one spot? Like you said, something like a gate, or plaque or something?
Also, have you noticed how many streets and pathways have a distinct arches?!
phrabbott
So you don’t think that upon finding Him of Hard word you take 22 east steps or more?
And then from the middle of one branch of the v (that you have now reached) you look down at simple roots?
V has to be a path?
I personally don’t love these constraints.
More of just seed balling a theory about a v path along these paths. Not married to it at all. Even if the verse is 100% correct, as we have it, we still don’t have a spot.
phrabbott
So you don’t think that upon finding Him of Hard word you take 22 east steps or more?
And then from the middle of one branch of the v (that you have now reached) you look down at simple roots?
V has to be a path?
I personally don’t love these constraints.
I was just thinking about that. I agree. The v is likely a path (worth discussing though). The positioning of the line of “him of hard words” between ‘the sign nearby’ and the ‘v’ makes me think this clue is very site specific and will eliminate any ambiguity about which v we should be standing at (Preiss must have taken into account the fact that the v would be ambiguous). The Hamilton sign helps but we have mentioned at least two Hamilton signs in Owls Head/north end of Shore Park. That line (hard words) could be the last piece of the puzzle. What was he thinking when he wrote it? There has to be a ground marker we are missing.
Any other thoughts on what a ‘v’ could be? The fact you to start at the middle of one branch, makes me think of something large in scale (like path) versus say a Roman numeral V on a monument.
NYCNative
…A portion of the bottom of her dress matches very well to the shape of shore park from Owl’s head to about 74th or so.
Props to NYCNative for this one. I hadn’t heard of this match before he proposed it. Here’s a pic for those who like a visual.
Second, I know some disagree, but I don’t subscribe to the theory that once something in the image is “matched” to something – that’s it – cross it off the list because it can be nothing else. I think JJP was even more brilliant than that. Others disagree and that is fine – but they may miss out on clue opportunities in the process. (Just my opinion).
The above match seems to deviate from Shore Road at about 74th. Why? Perhaps there is a reason.
Perhaps it is so the bottom of the dress better ALSO matches Staten Island (upside down). A well worn idea – but one that I think was already a better match than the bottom of Manhattan. And if NYCNative is correct (and I think he is) – that very rounded edge and line angle is not quite right for Staten Island because JJP snuck in the Owl’s Head Park roundness/Shore Road match.
Just one thought. And just my opinion. Your mileage may vary.
Kang
Props to NYCNative for this one. I hadn’t heard of this match before he proposed it. Here’s a pic for those who like a visual.
Second, I know some disagree, but I don’t subscribe to the theory that once something in the image is “matched” to something – that’s it – cross it off the list because it can be nothing else. I think JJP was even more brilliant than that. Others disagree and that is fine – but they may miss out on clue opportunities in the process. (Just my opinion).
The above match seems to deviate from Shore Road at about 74th. Why? Perhaps there is a reason.
Perhaps it is so the bottom of the dress better ALSO matches Staten Island (upside down). A well worn idea – but one that I think was already a better match than the bottom of Manhattan. And if NYCNative is correct (and I think he is) – that very rounded edge and line angle is not quite right for Staten Island because JJP snuck in the Owl’s Head Park roundness/Shore Road match.
Just one thought. And just my opinion. Your mileage may vary.
Thank you sir. I am internet challenged when it comes to posting pics correctly
phrabbott
Here’s my verse 10 translation done by my bonified, born and bred Japanese friend who knows nothing about this hunt:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0iwjkf088ccpe … 0.jpg?dl=0
The reason I had him do it, and that I overlayed it on the text, was I was never sure what was the translator’s ideas, what was the Japanese editors ideas, and what Preiss actually said. So this is word for word. Seems the editor has a lot of opinions in my mind that may be leading.
That is awesome Phil, Thanks!
I will look it over now!…
Well that cleared up somethings for me.
Whirring sound, seems easy enough.
So him of hard word can very well be an author but I suppose it is just implied, not for sure?
And yeah, as much as I hate Gershwin, there isn’t many other choices. The only two songs that have been thought of with rhapsody in it would be Rhapsody in blue and Bohemian rhapsody.
NYCNative
And yeah, as much as I hate Gershwin, there isn’t many other choices. The only two songs that have been thought of with rhapsody in it would be Rhapsody in blue and Bohemian rhapsody.
Now you understand why I won’t let up on that clue haha.
The whirring, while I wholeheartedly believe bikes, does seem very tainted by Japanese editor’s opinions.
phrabbott
Now you understand why I won’t let up on that clue haha.
The whirring, while I wholeheartedly believe bikes, does seem very tainted by Japanese editor’s opinions.
How so?
on land and man powered.
phrabbott
Here’s my verse 10 translation done by my bonified, born and bred Japanese friend who knows nothing about this hunt:
This is great. Did your friend translate the other hints?
phrabbott
No prob. I had posted it on the NYC facebook for fear of people here getting upset at reposts haha.
Him of Hard word. The problem is, in my mind, that they’re all just candidates and never anything better. That’s why I think it’s going to be purely contextual in the area and that when you see the one that makes sense in context of the other clues, you’ll be like ‘oh, I guess that’s him.’
That’s why NYCNative’s is so far the best I’ve seen other than RicHard Cochlea at Old Glory. Richard really seems like an obscure clue to me though, and I’m not sure where to take it from there. My idea on the chicken clue there is that these clues were a phone conversation and can’t be that deep of clues, so when the editor asked BP about this, BP scrambled to think of a CH word because Hard is masked by a CH sound in Richard. That’s really all I’ve got and it’s totally contradictory to my “hard can’t be the word hard” spoutings.
Can you elaborate on the RicHard Cochlea idea? The Cochlea has three chambers. Hmm.
davinci4
Can you elaborate on the RicHard Cochlea idea? The Cochlea has three chambers. Hmm.
Oof. I messed up his last name. Cocheo.
He’s with two other plaques, so those are the three vols in this idea.
I’m on my phone. Sorry!
davinci4
Okay. Let me throw one more v out there.
The v at the northern aspect of Vinland playground in South Shore Park.
This v starts at Oliver street. Charles Dickens = Oliver Twist? ..Oliver! was actually the name of the broadway musical.
Anyone explored here before?
My best guess at a complete solution so far:
In the shadow
Of the grey giant (at border of Manhattan)
Find the arm that (pick a parkway)
Extends over the slender path (278/Belt/BQE that extend over narrows)
In summer
You’ll often hear a whirring sound (ferries in NY Bay or bike path along Belt I.e. stay by the shore)
Cars abound (South Shore Park, bounded by Belt and Shore Road)
Although the sign
Nearby
Speaks of Indies native (Fort Hamilton Sign)
The natives still speak
Of him of Hard word in 3 Vols. (Oliver Street, Charles Dickens = Oliver! Or Oliver Twist)
Take twice as many east steps as the hour
Or more (take 22 steps east)
From the middle of one branch
Of the v (v at Oliver street in the park)
Look down
And see simple roots (?grass)
In rhapsodic man’s soil (general Brooklyn reference)
Or gaze north
Toward the isle of B. (SOL)
Everything but that god damn Dickens BS!!!!!!
davinci4
LOL. ..NYC, Why don’t you like the Dickens reference? Hard Times was written in Household Words in three volumes. Even if you don’t like the Japanese hint. Plus Preiss pays homage to the great authors of American classical literature throughout the Secret (Twain, Melville, Longfellow, RLS). An odd reference to Dickens I agree, but one I could see him using.
Have you ever visited this spot before? By Aerial imagery, it appears unchanged over last 40 years.
The thing about the Dickens reference is that it was created because the Japanese clue said it was word play with the word chicken. The laziest solution was to rhyme chicken with Dickens. I am sure we can connect a lot of literary people with the 3 vols. insert, but two questions: One. If we are going by those Japanese clues, didn’t they also say that this person was NOT a writer? Two. Why would any natives, none alone Brooklyn natives, still be talking about Dickens?
davinci4
The Hamilton sign helps but we have mentioned at least two Hamilton signs in Owls Head/north end of Shore Park.
Maybe I missed this, but which Hamilton signs were in Owl’s Head and the north end of Shore Park?
NYCNative
The thing about the Dickens reference is that it was created because the Japanese clue said it was word play with the word chicken. The laziest solution was to rhyme chicken with Dickens. I am sure we can connect a lot of literary people with the 3 vols. insert, but two questions: One. If we are going by those Japanese clues, didn’t they also say that this person was NOT a writer? Two. Why would any natives, none alone Brooklyn natives, still be talking about Dickens?
I agree with this. I’ve never even come close to thinking that “Dickens” was part of this solution. And I’m honestly kind of surprised so many people jumped onto that bandwagon since, as you said, it’s practically the “laziest solution.” Sure, it
might
be correct, but I’d wager against that.
davinci4
Okay. Let me throw one more v out there.
The v at the northern aspect of Vinland playground in South Shore Park.
This v starts at Oliver street. Charles Dickens = Oliver Twist? ..Oliver! was actually the name of the broadway musical.
Anyone explored here before?
I have a little bit. When I first thought of the Oliver/Dickens idea and saw the V nearby haha. Inconclusive… That would be one I would just blindly probe (if I blindly probed.)
I actually commend you for running with Oliver idea. I thought for a second that there might be something there, but I stand by the fact that Hard word is not going to actually be the word “Hard.” Probe me wrong. Pun intended.
Re: V question. If the V is the end of the 22 steps as I implied and not the beginning, it could be anything. Branch could imply tree. Could end near a path. Could be a structure or shorthand for something. Could be a metal fence support
NYCNative
The thing about the Dickens reference is that it was created because the Japanese clue said it was word play with the word chicken. The laziest solution was to rhyme chicken with Dickens. I am sure we can connect a lot of literary people with the 3 vols. insert, but two questions: One. If we are going by those Japanese clues, didn’t they also say that this person was NOT a writer? Two. Why would any natives, none alone Brooklyn natives, still be talking about Dickens?
Siskel, 2004
other tidbits that drew us to this area included the reference to the “natives still speak of him of Hard word in three vols.” which thus far Egbert believes might refer to Charles Dickens (author of Hard Times which, when written, was divided into three novellas)
Not so, the Dickens was a contender for “Him of hard word / 3 vols” well before the Japanese hints were released
http://quest4treasure.co.uk/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=754&p=15456&hilit=dickens#p15456
GoldenMartyr
This is great. Did your friend translate the other hints?
As he’s not into the hunt, I just did the one most pertinent to me as to not ask to much of him. Due to popular demand I’ll get some beers and we’ll do a full translating sess. I do think it came out very well and reads much more naturally. (sorry verse 12 I hope to be drunk by then)
phrabbott
As he’s not into the hunt, I just did the one most pertinent to me as to not ask to much of him. Due to popular demand I’ll get some beers and we’ll do a full translating sess. I do think it came out very well and reads much more naturally. (sorry verse 12 I hope to be drunk by then)
Completely understood. Appreciate it and would be happy to fund beer.
dosethree
Not so, the Dickens was a contender for “Him of hard word / 3 vols” well before the Japanese hints were released
http://quest4treasure.co.uk/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=754&p=15456&hilit=dickens#p15456
Noted.
I still do not like the theory and I think the Oliver link is thin still. Why would the natives still speak of him?
I think when they first thought of Dickens it was due to something in downtown Manhattan and even that was pretty lose.
GoldenMartyr
Completely understood. Appreciate it and would be happy to fund beer.
As a professional beer drinker, that will be unnecessary haha
NYCNative
Why would the natives still speak of him?
Perhaps because he trashed them in the article
The Noble Savage
.
The Noble Savage
was published in
Household Words
, the weekly magazine Dickens edited. The same weekly magazine where
Hard Times
was initially published in installments.
davinci4
Speaking of Japanese translation. Let me throw this out to the group (NYC bare with me):
If there was a street named “Christmas Carol Drive”’ next to South Shore Park would you think about the Dickens reference differently. I only ask because I am not sure if its “hard word” or “Oliver” part that people don’t like. With regard to hard word, even if you don’t like “chicken” clue, the translation does say you are looking for the name of an author (?agree). With regards to “Oliver” Preiss has put ‘two step riddles’ in other puzzles (like “step on copper”, copper -> penny-> Lincoln Memorial vs saying something one-step like ‘where the 16th sits’). Thoughts?
Dosethree that’s an excellent point.
It is both and the question of why the natives, any natives, would STILL be talking about him? Also, when the verse uses the word although, it seems to suggest it is someone opposite to indies native. But that might just be my interpretation of it.
And yes, if that street was named Christmas Carol drive I would be knee deep in Dickens (no homo).
GoldenMartyr
Perhaps because he trashed them in the article
The Noble Savage
.
The Noble Savage
was published in
Household Words
, the weekly magazine Dickens edited. The same weekly magazine where
Hard Times
was initially published in installments.
That is interesting!
But then that makes the natives into the native american population (and not even the original native tribes of NY). Still doesn’t make sense that native americans are still speaking of Dickens, who didn’t write the article, just edited.
Not trying to be harsh on this point, just pointing out that it seems off. I get you have to make connections from one thing to the other but this is a little much.
Agree to disagree on this one friends. I just don’t see it.
GoldenMartyr
Start with chicken – CHarles dICKENs – check
Hard – Hard Times – check
3 vols. – Sowing/Reaping/Garnering – check
word – Household Words – check
Natives – The Noble Savage – check
Come on, this has to be wrong!
Hey, if you are positive about it, go with it!
Don’t forget Oliver as well!!
davinci4
I think ‘the natives still speak of him’ is (could) basically saying the people of this neighborhood in Brooklyn who live on Oliver St. Connotation is that they speak of him (really one of his famous works) because they live there. …,NYC interesting about “Christmas Carol Drive.” I completely understand your point “Christmas Carol” way more appealing than “Oliver.” Could this be a dated reference and we are not getting it because we are not living in 1982? Oliver! was a very popular broadway musical in the late 1960’s. Wikipedia actually references Oliver Twist as s reason this name rose in popularity (I think of the kid from the Brady Bunch). I could see Preiss standing at that spot and seeing “Oliver st.’ and using the name “Oliver” to invoke Charles Dickens in his clue. Its not as recognizable as “Christmas Carol” but maybe we are having difficulty given how ‘dated’ this clue might be.
I appreciate you trying with Dickens but I am not going to be sold on it. i get the logic but I just do not agree.
And from the Japanese clues, I does not say he is for sure an author. It says it makes you think it is an author because of “volumes” .
Obviously, this verse is the bitch of the bunch. it can be interpreted many different ways and the clues are vague.
You can say that him of hard word in 3 vols. is a title of this person, or you can say the natives still speak of him in 3 vols.
Unknown
Unknown:
Recovery effort underway. Fingers crossed.
The best of luck to you as well.
davinci4
Kang I do wish you best of luck in your recovery efforts as well..most of the fun in these hunts, I find, is the process of exploring new ideas and discussion that develops on the forum as a result. For example, I was convinced the cask was in JPJ for years until just a few weeks ago. The ideas presented here have generated new thoughts and taken me in different directions than I previously considered.
As I told NYC, this particular thread has been one of the most enjoyable (and insightful) threads I have been on in a long time. I do hope we can continue our discussion.
Choice
Good luck Kang and hurry before Dambala get there 1st!
davinci4
:)..nice one.
I seriously can not find any information on that field. We know it is Frank Schnurr ballpark now. I have no idea when that name was placed there. What was it before!?
phrabbott
You seem to be going through the standard stages of considering South Brooklyn. Haha. Everything you’ve discussed is why many of us liked and then abandoned the Bay Ridge area at some time. But with this hunt, I’ve found I keep crawling back to locations I considered and abandoned years ago.
I know I believed the “major culture, major park required” theory for a while and have spoken to others that shared that sentiment as well, but I really don’t think we know enough to impose that kind of restriction. And having worked pretty much every major park in Brooklyn, Staten Island, and Manhattan extensively, I’ve found that all we can really do is follow the clues.
I’d take some time and scan the i12 and v10 threads for more info as this has been discussed extensively.
Yes. I have read through many. The problem with the other threads is that you often get incomplete solutions. A line or two that match up but not the complete walkthrough. The other problem is that the locations in NY are all over the place. It’s not that the ideas are bad, it’s just tough to focus on one location. One of the main reasons I like the way this thread is organized. ..phrabbot, do you have a v10 walkthrough (Any location-South Shore, Sunset, Prospect) you wouldn’t mind sharing?
phrabbott
I know I believed the “major culture, major park required” theory for a while… but I really don’t think we know enough to impose that kind of restriction… I’ve found that all we can really do is follow the clues.
For those who didn’t grow up around here or not old enough to remember, areas of NYC in the 70’s and early 80’s were far from the gentrified places full of high income hipsters they are now. The city had almost gone bankrupt, Ford told us to “Drop Dead”, everything including parks were dilapidated and crime and drugs were rampant. Many parks were places to be avoided especially at night. Many were dangerous to be in. Muggings were SOP, some parks were called “needle parks.” Not a place you’d want to be at night or rooting around the ground or digging. Simply No-Go places.
Remember at some level, Preiss is on the hook for searchers’ safety. What would Bantam say and what would book sales do if the local news story was “Local teen stabbed to death in _____ park looking for buried treasure.” Might sound far fetched now, but back then I assure you it was not.
I’m not bashing anyone’s park of choice. But take a look at some of the info below and ask yourself – “Though my neighborhood and park is a great place to be now – what was it probably like in 1982?”
(Take a look at the many pics in this article)
https://www.businessinsider.com/what-central-park-looked-like-in-the-1980s-2015-1
“Central Park was a dangerous place in the 1980s….The park was covered in garbage and graffiti, the meadows were barren dust-bowls, the playground equipment and benches were in decay, and the one-hundred-year-old infrastructure was crumbling.
In fact, many thought it was lawless ruin— and avoided it at all costs.
In efforts to make the park a safe place again, a Central Park Conservancy was formed. In 1980, the Conservancy began to enact a ‘master plan’ that would lead to the gradual reestablishment of the park…”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prospect_Park_(Brooklyn)
“…By the 1970s, Prospect Park was beset by crime;
a 1974 report found that 44 percent of city residents would warn people to stay away from the park under any circumstances.
[34] The mayoral administration of Ed Koch formed plans in 1980 to turn over the administration of the troubled Prospect Park Zoo to the Wildlife Conservation Society.[85] Over the next seven years, the city invested $17 million in cleaning up the park,[86] including $10 million in federal funds from a Community Development Block Grant.[87] Annual visitor numbers had nearly tripled to 5 million between 1980 and 1987…”
Now SW Brooklyn parks were not immune to this. I’m sure they were far different and scuzzier than they are now. But contrast the statements above with those of this 1982 NY Times article about the neighborhood we’re talking about.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1q2c7-5jzvmTRaPAvGBwDTIRVvqzNgr-p/view?usp=sharing
“…Views of the bridge and the Narrows are a selling point for apartments and houses,
especially along Shore Road, known as the ”Gold Coast” of Brooklyn
…
Crime is not much talked about partly because it is not a major problem.
Sgt. John Granite of the 68th precinct said that burglaries and auto thefts were the area’s most serious crimes, but that
”from 65th Street to 101st Street is one of the safest areas in Brooklyn.”
Looking through that lens and given the choices Preiss had at the time, a smaller park in a safe, affluent neighborhood might have sounded like a very good idea. Perhaps the decision was less about what those string of parks “have” than what they “didn’t have”…
davinci4
I always liked the Roman numeral clock at the school as a marker and wondered if the students could be ‘natives’ Preiss was referring to. Never could make a good connection though.
If “Him” is Charles Dickens, the students are almost certainly the natives in my opinion.
phrabbott
If “Him” is Charles Dickens, the students are almost certainly the natives in my opinion.
How do we connect them (Charles Dickens and high school students)?
phrabbott
Students still speak of Charles Dickens. NYCNative always had the gripe that noone in NYC is speaking of Charles Dickens. That’s true. But in school, they certainly are.
“Although the sign nearby says [ft.] Hamilton [High school]”, the students still speak of [read] Charles Dickens.
Seems like a pretty reasonable logic puzzle. (if we’re assuming these two phrases need to make sense together.)
I hate to say it, but this makes sense.
davinci4
Hmmmm. Yes. When you put it that way. That actually does make a lot of sense. Interesting. ..take a look at White Rabbits solution. It has great picks of this area. …very interesting. Wow. This could be our “ah ha” moment.
DAVINCI! Don’t make me search this forum for that post!!
I am way to lazy for that today!
NYCNative
DAVINCI! Don’t make me search this forum for that post!!
I am way to lazy for that today!
Haha…it’s in the Wiki. Scroll to bottom under “ Online Resources”
davinci4
This could be our “ah ha” moment.
Heh, Ya, you can ah ha right across the street to the V shaped path that got completely ripped apart in construction!
phrabbott
Heh, Ya, you can ah ha right across the street to the V shaped path that got completely ripped apart in construction!
I remember this solve. Well, lets hope it was not there.
phrabbott
Heh, Ya, you can ah ha right across the street to the V shaped path that got completely ripped apart in construction!
But the area in question was not disturbed (correct me if I am wrong). The v was redone, but the area east of the v and Shore Road where the trees are was left intact, no?
davinci4
Thanks GMan!… I have never walked Shore Park but let me reverse it. If a cask were buried in that park, there seem like very few landmarks Preiss could have used to help us locate the ‘v’ (agree?). A few streets with proper names (Oliver, Bay Ridge), only a handful of monuments, Fort Hamilton HS. Any others?
Also if the cask is in Shore Park, I do feel that the walkthrough ‘ends’ with “him of hard word” analogous to walking ‘past his left shoulder’-you are at the cask site. The remaining part is ‘recovery instructions.’ And I thinks it’s cleverly constructed too. You really can’t get to the v (since as we have discussed, a v could mean several different things), unless you have solved every clue up until that point.
With that said, are we at a stalemate? If we can’t figure out a logical interpretation of “him of hard word” as it relates to this area, is there a discussion point beyond that?
I guess it is all about how you look at it. If we think that we have the other lines in the verse correct, him of hard word would be nothing but more confirmation (which would still be great).
I have a feeling that when we actually know who him of hard word is, it is going to be a slap in the face. I showed the verse to a Professor friend of mine, who is a great problem solver, as well as another intellectual. Both said the same thing which I found fascinating. They said it sounds like a biblical figure (we can all understand why).
davinci4
Honestly. I am way too far away but would so happy is someone found this. ..the clock tower, the “83 or 85 st.” are kind of all making sense now.
So what was that part of the park named in 1980?
phrabbott
Hardword Johnson III Park
LMAO
That’s F ^
phrabbott
Da fack!? She’s a cyborg?
LMAO!
leighanny
Hi, I’m trying to do this on my phone so I apologize if the link doesn’t work. My NY (Brooklyn) theory (I apologize for calling it my solution, I meant theory, when I wrote it and I can’t change it at this time) is in The Greater the Difficultly piece. My strong visual for Old Glory is the entire window frame being equal to the city blocks next to Old Glory. My theory follows along simply until the ending. I think we’re to take 32 steps rather than 22. My NY theory follows with my Old Testament theory. Old Glory = the Glory of God. I understand if you find this far fetched, no worries. I don’t like that I think it’s near a tree either.
http://www.thesecretofthesecret.blog
Also, a link to my updated OT theory maybe on the top of this WordPress site, otherwise it can be found on the main FB site.
Thanks for sharing Leighanny!
leighanny
http://www.thesecretofthesecret.blog
That was a good read. The mention of the ruler was something that I hadn’t seen before, and works in concert with my own thoughts about this particular puzzle. Looking forward to my next dig attempt with that in mind.
Choice
P.S. I see you’re using Wiki image? Download images from 12treasures.com. George went true a lot of effort scanning those in hi-res. ]
davinci4
I am not from NY, just researching a little. Maybe New Yorkers could weigh in here. Is Brooklyn know for its Russian immigration? Reading about Brighton Beach. I think of the Italian immigration when it comes to NYC, but maybe Russian theme was chosen due to the cask’s location in Brooklyn. NY is such a melting pot, but is it fair to say Brooklyn is specifically known for its Russian immigrants (similar to the Irish in South Boston)?
idyl
Yes, Russian Jews make up a huge portion of Brooklyn’s southern sections, mostly based on immigration.
davinci4
Just wanted to hopefully close the loop. Kang poses a good question regarding St. Basils. It is, at first, seemingly redundant to create a Russian image in this painting. It’s very easy to pair each painting with a country of origin by using the jewels as outlined in the beginning of the book.
It seems by including such an iconic image of Russia in the painting, JJP/Preiss are basically saying, ‘we want you to take extra consideration about the country of origin in this particular puzzle- it will help you.’ ..….
Sorry for the delay. Just catching up on today’s posts.
Only for pics I post here. George’s files are fantastic but so hi-res I have to scale them down or what I post comes out obnoxiously large. Thanks again George!
First – davinci4 – You would be correct in your feeling that that the number of Russian immigrants to NYC are
way
down the list of immigrant groups for NYC. More well known groups and more numerous would include Italians, Irish, Puerto Rico and Chinese and others. And I’d like to push back a bit on Idyl’s assertion here. Here’s a primer on Brooklyn’s neighborhoods.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Brooklyn_neighborhoods
.
Russians or Russian Jews are not and have not been particularly noteworthy in Southwest Brooklyn, which is defined as Bay Ridge, Fort Hamilton, Bensonhurst, Bath Beach, New Utrecht, Borough Park, Dyker Heights, Sunset Park.
The vast majority of Jewish immigrants and/or Russian immigrants settled in Brighton Beach or Sheepshead Bay – both of which are South Brooklyn not Southwest Brooklyn – or in Manhattan’s Lower East Side.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Americans_in_New_York_City
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_New_York
What group IS Southwest Brooklyn particularly known for (well, used to be known for)? Hint: Leif Erikson Park, Vinland Playgroud and Leif Erikson Parkway are not accidentally named. The whole area, including Bay Ridge used to have SO many Norwegians, it was called “Little Norway.” They still have a Norwegian Day Parade every May 17th.
https://www.norwegianamerican.com/heritage/norwegian-brooklyn/
https://forgotten-ny.com/2006/06/norse-code-in-bay-ridge/
I believe this is a very important statement.
Does Cleveland leap to mind when you think of Greek immigration? Or Persians in Houston? What if there’s something else going on here??
If Russians or Jewish immigrants are not particularly associated with Southwest Brooklyn, what gives? No Russian church very nearby. No Famous Russian residents. No Russian Park. No Russian statue or monument that’s catching anyone’s eye. Maybe what’s needed is something outside the box.
Davinci4 and Idyl, if you have not already, I urge you to give my post below a read and the document/analysis within. Particularly Parts 2 & 4.
It theorizes that for some of the puzzles, what if the immigration link (and related clues) were more about where the Fair Folk immigrated and the places they are drawn to – than about Man’s immigration.
http://quest4treasure.co.uk/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=7258&start=480#p153116
Durian
So back to the albatross… does anyone have any idea why JJP seems to have rendered the woman’s eyes with the distinctive black markings of an albatross? Seems to me this is a fairly important clue. Especially when taken in context of the bird in the image. It appears to me to be part of a repeated clue, empahsized.
i have no idea how you made a connection between the bird in the image, an albatross, and the woman’s eyes.
The head is obviously something of a eagle, and we have a few famous ones in NY to choose from. the body, one would assume is closer to that of a seagull, which would make sense for New York harbor. More sense then a bird that doesn’t exist in this part of the country.
I am curious. Which came first in your thoughts. The woman has eyes like an albatross, so therefor the bird is one or vice versa?
Glossiphoniidae
You’re right… it definitely can’t be that Ophelia… the BarryMORE on the “steps” store.Maybe it’s a painting of Ophelia we are looking for?
Choice
Greatness Kang! Pretty close.
https://tinyurl.com/y3mz4ooq
But at the risk of getting screamed at
If you stand a bit to the left then the “Manhattan” part of the gap would be even narrower.
Maybe JJP manipulated the image to insert a Manhattan like feature in there.
(takes cover)
davinci4
Kang. …St Basil drawn in perspective. No question. Nice work! …One panel we can cross off the list now.
Psst! He fellas. If you’re gonna post random pictures of statues of women in a long dress and pretend it’s a P12 image match, please be sure they are statues in SW Brooklyn, as this is what this thread is focused on. All other random non-image matches should go in the usual Image 12 thread. (Rim shot). Thanks for your understanding.
I think you may have be confused with someone else. Never any screaming from me. But I will take your question seriously and try to reason with you, if that’s OK.
The image you linked may be from an even better spot from my original. Well done. However, I don’t think it helps make your case. Maybe the opposite. It seems that the optimal spot may be between #1 & #2 below. As you can see, the negative space gap is widening, not getting smaller. It’s actually getting closer to JJP’s icon. Maybe you need to remove/clean up peek-a-boo back dome from #2. After that, it’s pretty spot on to the painting. No agenda needed.
And one last thing, peek-a-boo blue and white dome from #1- Seriously, that’s pretty spot on.
Now if you want to say that negative space is a match to Manhattan. You are welcome to. But you will never convince me no matter how many times you post it. To me – and I speak only for myself – it is just not a match. Full stop. In any way, shape or form. I could pull a sock out of a drawer and it’s got a 50/50 chance of being a better match. Sorry, but you’re not going to convince me on this one. But you are welcome to think what you like.
Well, not so fast. At best we may know the inspiration for the icon and can stop looking for a building. And that would be a win. Thing is – if it’s not an image match – what does it mean and why is it there? (Why do I feel like we went from frying pan to fire) – DOH!
Kang
Psst! He fellas. If you’re gonna post random pictures of statues of women in a long dress and pretend it’s a P12 image match…
davinci4
maybe Russian theme was chosen due to the cask’s location in Brooklyn.
Glossiphoniidae
davinci4
Anyone wish to discuss the other panel in the painting? It’s not unique (a gray rectangle), but it’s significance is unclear. Accepted theory is that it one of the twin towers. Thoughts?
Also, following NYC’s lead in starting this thread, just a friendly reminder to keep the discussion about South Brooklyn.
Just to clarify, I am all ears when it comes to hearing theories that are not about S. Brooklyn. But if I am going to give any consideration to them, I ask you do your own homework and research on them before bringing them here for people to tare apart. So far, people have chimed in with their own (non S. Brooklyn related) theories and clues but not one of them followed up with them or even had any relevance in proposing them in the first place.
Durian: My intentions is not to be mean to you, although my post might be harsh. I feel no matter what is said to you, you will still believe you are 100% right about your theory. My only suggestion to you is that you get a better understanding of the book and all the elements in it. Image 12 is supposed to be one, if not the hardest puzzle in the group, I seriously doubt that it can all be solved using one central figure and ignoring everything else ( or taking it with a grain of salt).
Yes, lets keep this conversation on S. Brooklyn or at very least about the verse or the image, which I think we need to cover better.
phrabbott
I honestly didn’t know that anyone thought it was a twin tower and I certainly don’t think that there is an accepted theory on that panel. Way too vague. The prevailing theories seem to be the Ellis Island dock or something visual and local to the site.
Why red outline? All I can come up with is that the dock is surrounded in brick.
You have to be careful with words like “accepted” or you’ll derail the thread as people will just argue over “who says it’s accepted!?” and then 421 and the like will show up and list every rectangle east of the Mississippi.
LMAO.
I laugh because it is true!
davinci4
Let me rephrase it. If we were to pick an immigration population for (South) Brooklyn (like Irish in South Boston), would Russian immigrants be a reasonable choice?
Yes, Russian Jews make up a huge portion of Brooklyn’s southern sections, mostly based on immigration.
Choice
We need a stronger wall!
is that a MAGA thing!…. >:D
MERLIN
is that a MAGA thing!…. >:D
Durian
… Peter … Hard …
Hide your stone-markers!
davinci4
Let me rephrase it. If we were to pick an immigration population for (South) Brooklyn (like Irish in South Boston), would Russian immigrants be a reasonable choice?
Hard to look at this puzzle with fresh eyes sometimes, but imagine it’s 1982 and you connect this panel to St Basil’s and then to South Brooklyn. Would be an extremely helpful clue when you consider all
the possibilities in NYC and greater NY area.
“The lone eagle” works with both Brooklyn and Roosevelt Island.
Spirit of St. Louis took off from Roosevelt Airfield on Long Island which Brooklyn technically a part of.
So question is Coney island or Jersey shore for summer vacation?
Unknown
Unknown:
and then 421 and the like will show up and list every rectangle east of the Mississippi.
Can’t speak for 421, but “the like” will just point out that 12 pages into this thread, the only thing that seems to be “accepted” is that the Statue of Liberty is represented in Image 12.
Carry on.
Euhirudinea
Can’t speak for 421, but “the like” will just point out that 12 pages into this thread, the only thing that seems to be “accepted” is that the Statue of Liberty is represented in Image 12.
Carry on.
Then you obviously did not read all 12 pages. Do you always ignore the details to make your weak point strong?
The point of the thread, just like any other, is not to unanimously agree and accept a theory or idea.
So the like, can kiss my ass! Especially those who criticize all day long and put zero effort into making their own theories and ideas.
Durian
Forgot to mention another key thing about St. Peter, in addition to being a “rock” in three of the Gospels…
We think of the word rhapsodic as meaning music. But it actually means elated. In fact, if you look it up in Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, the word is defined in terms of feeling elated. This is straight from the dictionary…the caps are not mine, but the dictionary entry’s: “extravagantly emotional : RAPTUROUS”
Now in addition to being the rock of the church, walking on water, and being the patron saint of Peter the Great (who named St. Petersburg after him), St. Peter famously holds the keys to heaven. Think of how busy Christians believe he will be at the Rapture! The word rapture itself means feeling elated. Rapture = Rhapsodic. Literally holding the keys to heaven makes St. Peter the rhapsodic man. And if the casque is buried at St. Peter’s church, it is literally in the Rapture man’s soil, on the grounds of a church that bears his name.
Hey Durian and welcome to the thread!
I really like your perspective and your first post was very clever. I will for sure do my homework on it.
I am just curious as to why you ignored the Japanese clues with your rhapsodic man interpretation? And surely you can be suggesting the verse is referencing the same person in two different ways.
Also, your site location is on private property
The three saints is very interesting! I will look up the spot later and get back to you.
Thanks for your perspective and insight and welcome to this “branch” of hell!
NYCNative
Especially those who criticize all day long and put zero effort into making their own theories and ideas.
Before I respond, I’d like to know if I’m lumped in here. Do you think I am one of these people?
davinci4
Yes. Sorry. “Accepted” was probably not a good word to use there. I agree. …this is an odd panel. A rectangle is such a common shape.
https://live.staticflickr.com/30/607081 … 49c8_z.jpg
phrabbott
421 does do very good work on these puzzles and their posts are rarely impulsive or unresearched.
And all serve a very important purpose. They may not always make sense to everyone (or anyone), but they eventually will.
MERLIN
https://live.staticflickr.com/30/607081 … 49c8_z.jpg
I thought this is well, Merlin. Just could never make it fit into anything productive, Brooklyn or not.
How can we speculate what a common shape could be in reference to? There are just to many possibilities even when we use the strong clues we think we have. I think we can speculate all day on what it can be but I think it is one of the clues that will be found at the dig site and make sense.
I am some point would like to do some experiments with different color filters and the hard copy of the book, go old school. I am sure its been done before but I think the hope is that it would reveal something easy like numbers or letters. In considering the podcast interview with the photographer, it may just lead to another game of counting bubbles or separating them based on size. So while tried, I would like to try different methods with the results. Whatever is there, would probably be crucial but I don’t think it will be all we need.
We still have the mess of clues from the water. The waves and ripples and reflections. This is where we are all going to stare at the image again and make out things that probably are not there.
Obviously, we only have two solves that we can use as examples, although those puzzle are not the same beast as this one. But, if the idea is that every casque is in an area with ties to the immigration story of that puzzle, would it really be as easy and broad as saying something like Gershwin was Russian and he lived in Brooklyn, so close enough? Or would the actual spot have an undeniable Russian link to it? BP seemed to be really into the immigration theme for a reason. Hell, the entire book is dedicated to it, so hard to see why he would omit that crucial detail when picking a spot.
Thoughts?
MERLIN
I thought the red line could possibly be a reference to Russia’s Red Square – which coincidentally houses Saint Basil’s in Russia.
Durian
Yes, you are supposed to dig on the church’s property. It’s St. Peter’s Church, and St. Peter holds the keys to heaven. He is
the man
for the rapture, and getting into heaven, period. Rapture is defined as elated. Rhapsodic is also defined as elated. Rapture = Rhapsodic. Miriam’s even includes the word rapture in the definition of rhapsodic.
So dgging in rhapsodic man’s soil means digging in St. Peter’s soil, literally.
And the church is in the St. George neighborhood of Staten Island, on St. Mark’s Pl. Three Saints for the three domes.
BTW, St. George is the grey giant. St. George was a Roman soldier executed for failing to recant his Christian beliefs. For this he is considered a Great Martyr of the Eastern Orthodox and Russian Orthodox Churches. Great = Giant. And he is grey because he is always depicted in paintings as wearing knight’s armor, since he was a soldier. Being “In the shadow of the grey giant” means literally being in the St. George neighborhood of Staten Island.
BTW, St. Mark looks a little familiar:
So we are supposed to ignore all the Japanese clues, all known patterns of the puzzles we know and have come to hate, and ignore the clear print in the book that says it wouldn’t be buried in private property?
Are we even playing the same game?
I will say good try. I like some aspects of your theory but the rest comes of a bit lazy. You are clearly not playing within the bounds of this game and that is going to be a big issue with anyone giving a serious attempt at it.
NYCNative
I am some point would like to do some experiments with different color filters and the hard copy of the book, go old school. I am sure its been done before but I think the hope is that it would reveal something easy like numbers or letters. In considering the podcast interview with the photographer, it may just lead to another game of counting bubbles or separating them based on size. So while tried, I would like to try different methods with the results. Whatever is there, would probably be crucial but I don’t think it will be all we need.
I think that if you’re going to try light gel overlays, start with a magenta and [yellow?] that are similar to the solid panels. Maybe that’s their purpose.
davinci4
NYC. I always adopted a more simple theory for the water/waves. Other than hiding the coordinates, the generally imagery is a shore= Shore Road Park or Shore Road.
Thoughts? I don’t want to fall into the trap of overthinking these two much… The bubbles seem like quite a different story. ….
I agree I think it just means you can see water from the site.
Durian
Definitely. I am certain the patterns in the water have a meaning to the puzzle. But let’s take a step back:
We are looking at a complete seascape. No land. Why?
Why are there three drops of water?
Why is the central figure able to rise above the waves?
Why is the only other living thing a seabird?
I believe explaining why these choices were made in the image design will probably go a long way towards solving the puzzle.
Why assume they are water drops?
phrabbott
I don’t know… it seems like devoting 1/3 of a painting to water with crazy waves and squiggles should be more than just “we’re near water”
I hear you, of course it could depend on how prominent a feature the water near the site is.
phrabbott
sage
… in all fields.
Durian
Why is the only other living thing a seabird?
Do you think that seabird has an eagle or turtle head?
NYCNative
For me, it is a little hard to believe that everything in the water just is symbolic of one thing, there is just to much going on there. Sure there is a general theme of the shore or near the river, but for sure there is more to it then just that.
Don’t forget JJP did hide the coordinates in there as well. Will be curious to see if the group finds anything more. ..
NYC. Total side note. I did go through the passages in the book. I looked at the introduction, as well as the fairy in NY and those with Russian ancestry. The only thing that stood out (and I know you are not going to like this observation) was the Tax Burden giving money to orphans…Oliver Twist. Anyone?
davinci4
Oliver Twist. Anyone?
I’m in…
http://www.traceguthrie.com/lifesize-sculptures/oliver-twist
New thread… I8/V10… who’s makin’ it?
Choice
Yes, the body is albatross not the head.
A double eagle on an eagle? Wew!
Glossiphoniidae
A double eagle on an eagle? Wew!
Choice
46 being 2 X 23:00, 11PM.
Comon’, Choice…. a 2 and a 3…
Where’s times square again?
Choice
the birds feet form the same pattern as the woman’s left hand fingers.
Isn’t that the islanders logo?
NYCNative
Guys,
We need more information about other possible probes or digs on the site since we are not the first ones to arrive at this spot for a solve. If anyone can point us in the right direction or has info on this site and what has been done or not done it would help a lot.
Why do you need that info? Just go dig. Even if someone previously dug there and was off by 6 inches, no cigar.
gManTexas
Why do you need that info? Just go dig. Even if someone previously dug there and was off by 6 inches, no cigar.
When your right your right.
I AM ON IT!!
Choice
Because of the similarities between image 1 and 12; if the cask turns out to be in front of the high school then the odds of San Francisco cask being in front of the Galileo High would be higher. One next to baseball field, the other football field.
Choice. If this cask winds up being there, you deserve credit for the “83 (or 5)” in the red dot panel. Still one of my favorite image confirmers.
NYCNative
This is the area in full construction/renovation status. It looks as if the major part of this construction is that deep hole at the top of the V. Not sure what that is. I am trying to find out what the reason for the construction is but it doesn’t seen that they broke much ground, except for that one spot. At least I hope not.
Are one of you going to head over there? Maybe they let you dig, lol.
NYCNative
This is the area in full construction/renovation status. It looks as if the major part of this construction is that deep hole at the top of the V. Not sure what that is. I am trying to find out what the reason for the construction is but it doesn’t seen that they broke much ground, except for that one spot. At least I hope not.
NYC. When was that photo taken? Isn’t there a fire hydrant where that hole is/was?
gManTexas
Are one of you going to head over there? Maybe they let you dig, lol.
I will be there no later then Tuesday afternoon just to do a recon. It seems all the did was a bit of landscaping and that massive hole. This also all happened right after Hurricane Sandy, from the looks of it. Weird thing is the rest of the area looks fine, right after the storm, but this little portion. So probably not damage from the storm.
There should be little problem if we have to probe or dig there.
gManTexas
Are one of you going to head over there? Maybe they let you dig, lol.
As of now, this area is completely resodded and park-like again. This picture must be around 2012 when it was completely barricaded.
davinci4
NYC. When was that photo taken? Isn’t there a fire hydrant where that hole is/was?
I believe this was in 2014. NO fire hydrant. My guess is that it is a storm pipe. I am sure I will know when I get there. It isn’t a big deal since this is not where I imagine the casque would be. Be a damn shame if it was though.
davinci4
Agreed. You are only looking at a very small part of the park (east side) near the fence at Shore Road, which by the looks of it, was relatively undisturbed.
NYC. If you do decide to go, I will be curious to hear your thoughts. Not only about the logistics, 22 east steps, v etc. but also your general feeling. You have studied this puzzle a long time. Will be curious what your instincts tell you as you get to the middle of the v and look up at the clock tower. Take the 22 steps (or more) to the fence. Does it all line up? Without the trees, is SOL visible in the distance? Can you see (“hear”) the bikers on the promenade? How is the view of the Verrazano? What is the terrain like there?
Maybe you will uncover additional clues we can’t see without being there.
Very exciting!
For sure! I will take in the sights. I will take some pictures and post them on the discord first. If anything pops out to us, then I will post them here.
I am very excited as well!
NYCNative
This is the area in full construction/renovation status. It looks as if the major part of this construction is that deep hole at the top of the V. Not sure what that is. I am trying to find out what the reason for the construction is but it doesn’t seen that they broke much ground, except for that one spot. At least I hope not.
NYC. Found the info on the construction in front of Fort Hamilton HS in 2012. It was called “The Siphon Project,” part of building a new water tunnel from Brooklyn to Staten Island to update old infrastructure as well as to make the new one deeper, so that larger boats can now pass into New York harbor.
https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/pres … 42pr.shtml
Doghousereiley
There is a chapter about dickens travels to the US in ABROAD IN AMERICA
This is interesting. Seems to me that entire book is worth a read.
davinci4
NYC. Found the info on the construction in front of Fort Hamilton HS in 2012. It was called “The Siphon Project,” part of building a new water tunnel from Brooklyn to Staten Island to update old infrastructure as well as to make the new one deeper, so that larger boats can now pass into New York harbor.
https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/pres … 42pr.shtml
This is awesome!!
Great find D!
I won’t have time today to go to the site, so for sure tomorrow. Although now I am just tempted to go with the shovel and probe and go for it!
We would be surprised to find out that nobody has gone to the spot before to probe or dig. If they did, no posts have been made about it. Doesn’t mean that it didn’t happen and also doesn’t matter at this point.
Just using google maps, I notice that the 22 steps from the V puts you under some trees, on the lawn of that portion of the ballfields. While standing there, if you look directly across the street, you are right in front of the High school entrance. I thought this overhead seemed compelling.
Do you think the shape of the lawn in front of the school has anything to do with this?
NYCNative
Just using google maps, I notice that the 22 steps from the V puts you under some trees, on the lawn of that portion of the ballfields. While standing there, if you look directly across the street, you are right in front of the High school entrance. I thought this overhead seemed compelling.
Do you think the shape of the lawn in front of the school has anything to do with this?
That’s why I said, you have a natural obstruction at about 22 steps of the fence. Line yourself up with the rectangle, flagpole and clock. Look down, stick shovel in the ground.
NYCNative
This is awesome!!
Great find D!
I won’t have time today to go to the site, so for sure tomorrow. Although now I am just tempted to go with the shovel and probe and go for it!
We would be surprised to find out that nobody has gone to the spot before to probe or dig. If they did, no posts have been made about it. Doesn’t mean that it didn’t happen and also doesn’t matter at this point.
Just using google maps, I notice that the 22 steps from the V puts you under some trees, on the lawn of that portion of the ballfields. While standing there, if you look directly across the street, you are right in front of the High school entrance. I thought this overhead seemed compelling.
Do you think the shape of the lawn in front of the school has anything to do with this?
That lawn in front of the school kind of matches the gray rectangle panel we have been pondering over..even more interesting when you look at it from that angle- A patch of grass between the trees and the fence about 50 feet from middle of the v, lining up with the clock tower!
maltedfalcon
many many people have tried all kinds of filters including 3d glasses
together and seperately
no one has found anything ever
are you saying you found something?
I am sure someone has tried every lens possible and color combos by now. What pops up are distinct “bubbles” in a pattern. Doesn’t seem to spell anything out.
However, did anyone actually try the color filters with the theory of counting the bubbles and applying it to a solve area?
I also tried stereogram programs and that seems to be a big no go. However, when I removed one layer, what was left was the same dominant bubbles.
Meaning, we might have the right tool, just not the right method of putting it together.
OR Choice has the only magic eye here and the complex puzzle of solving the panels was as easy as his proposal.
I wish I could remember the name of those puzzle and games from the 80’s with the plastic colored tabs that reveal messages and patterns.
NYCNative
3D glasses seem to have no effect but I am sure there are other ways.
You missed the point of my suggestion of using the 3D glasses. The idea was to filter blue and red light since the panels are red and blue color based.
To do this you need to look at the panels with single lens at a time. So if you have 3D glasses wear it then cover red lens with your hand and look at the red panel. The bluish area will pop. Color contrast is less with other panels so one may have more difficulty hence the degree of hardness.
Choice
You missed the point of my suggestion of using the 3D glasses. The idea was to filter blue and red light since the panels are red and blue color based.
To do this you need to look at the panels with single lens at a time. So if you have 3D glasses wear it then cover red lens with your hand and look at the red panel. The bluish area will pop. Color contrast is less with other panels so one may have more difficulty hence the degree of hardness.
many many people have tried all kinds of filters including 3d glasses
together and seperately
no one has found anything ever
are you saying you found something?
maltedfalcon
many many people have tried all kinds of filters including 3d glasses
together and seperately
no one has found anything ever
are you saying you found something?
I think Choice has. As I mentioned before. I don’t think the “85 st.” is coincidental considering the area we are looking in
Goonie68
Maybe?
One branch of the V, Military branch = NA-VY? From the Brooklyn Naval Yard south , Flatbush and Washington form a V.
https://ibb.co/BChVJCy
One branch of the V:
Navy’s connection to Russia: USS Maine Memorial –> Cuba [island] –> Cuban missile crises with USSR
Coast Guard connection: Founded by Hamilton, base on Governors Island [island]
NYCNative
I created a discord channel… others just want to post every brain fart they have as a possible solve
Translation: “My farts smell better than your farts.”
Glossiphoniidae
Translation: “My farts smell better than your farts.”
Interesting translation. Sounds like you are projecting more then translating.
Don’t fret. One day your posts will make total sense…..One day.
NYCNative
Props to anyone going out to dig/probe in this HEAT! That is more dedication that even I have! Best of luck!
Glossiphoniidae
Translation: “My farts smell better than your farts.”
No luck today. Unless rocks count, which they don’t. Renovator – you can cross an additional 0.00000001% of NYC off the list of where it might be. That’s the only good news.
Much as I’d love some good fart humor, let me try a different tact. Posting in the Image 12 thread is like tying a rope around a tree and pulling. But that tree is not going anywhere because there are 10 other groups with their own rope pulling the tree in another direction. Then it devolves into a fight about who’s rope is better and which way is the right way to pull and nothing goes anywhere.
NYCNative created this thread as an experiment to see if a conversation could be more constructive if all the folks there were pulling in the same direction. Is it the right direction? Who knows.
If someone posts there that the woman in the dress looks like a statue in Dyker Heights and someone wants to critique that by saying that it’s not a match because the hair, dress and arms are totally not a match, that’s constructive and so be it. But if you just post over an over again that the match is to a statue in Eisenhower Park on Long Island, then you’re just trolling this thread. And then it devolves into aforementioned mudslinging.
Go ahead with your ideas. But I think NYCNative would ask you to please post them in the Image 12 thread. People reading this thread will see it. And respond there if they like.
An experiment like this to see if it might reduce the unnecessary aggressiveness around here is worth a try. Because it’s needed.
Unknown
Unknown:
Don’t fret. One day your posts will make total sense…..One day.
Man, I certainly hope so.
davinci4
I was looking into past threads about Fort Hamilton HS. One major reason they were sidetracked was regarding the false information that he attended it. I mention it because I don’t want the group going down this rabbit hole again.
Yes, given what his classmate Ben Asen said on the podcast last year and the yearbook photo you mention, it seems pretty clear that Byron went to Midwood High school. For what it’s worth I chased that rabbit last year – I contacted the Brooklyn Library and someone kindly went through their copies of “The Tower” (Fort Hamilton HS yearbook) for 1967-70 and reported back to me that she could not find a Bryon Preiss in any of those.
And not to muddy the waters, but another thing I found last year, since davinci brings up the subject (well done):
The current site of Fort Hamilton High School and it’s athletic fields used to be the site of the Crescent Athletic Club – and it went all the way down to the water – including what is now the ballfield davinci is interested in. Some of the members there are the source of some of the mansions that still exist near there.
https://www.brownstoner.com/history/past-and-present-the-crescent-athletic-club-bay-ridge/
There seems to be quite a few crescents and arches piling up in this puzzle, huh? Anyone sense a theme?
davinci4
Here it is. Courtesy of Harley Quinn
http://imgur.com/gallery/7YU1ERn
Just for fun….
According to his yearbook credits – and if the info that he graduated in 1968 is accurate – he should be in these somewhere. They were/are kind of a big deal at Midwood High School.
1,000 Secret ‘nerd points’ if you can pick out Byron’s voice….
Midwood High School “Senior Sing” Side A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dtBEQyi-hQ
Midwood High School “Senior Sing” Side B
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_doiJjQaEY
davinci4
Not sure. …Kang, can you help us with this one?
Umm, you guys are asking if I can help you with your Hardword Johnsons? Pass. Sounds like a setup.
What’s next, a round of “Moron says, what??”
Kang
Umm, you guys are asking if I can help you with your Hardword Johnsons? Pass. Sounds like a setup.
What’s next, a round of “Moron says, what??”
LMAO Hardword JOhnson!
No that was a joke. We where trying to find what the baseball field in front of the High school was named before its current name, which is Frank Schnurr ballfields.