Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:25 pm
Ive put a “?” after ones that are questionable.
PIC—————–#’s—————–LETTERS———
———————————————————
P1 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 38/122 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Roman/G/H
P2 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 79/80/33/23? Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â n?/h?
P3 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ??
P4 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 42/81 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ??
P5 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 41/87 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ??
P6 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2-(32?82?) Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ??
P7 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 29/90/19Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ??
P8 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 95/96/30 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â “zoo”?
P9 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 39 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â X(Roman?)
P10 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ?? Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ??
P11 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 111/112/41/42 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ??
P12 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 50/15/141? Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ??
Fri Jul 09, 2004 11:13 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
It seems to me that anywhere in any pic that we see a JP (pic 12?) or IP or 1P we have to consider the possibility that these are the artists initials, both of which are JP.
wilhouse
Good point. Â I had not thought of this but when looking back at the pic I think I might have to agree – certainly looks like a P and most artists would be inclined to put their initials in. Â He might even have put them in to distract us.
Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:05 am
wilhouse
Thu Jul 08, 2004 12:43 am
Thu Jul 08, 2004 7:38 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
I don’t understand… You start the thread and don’t want to check our suggestions? Or don’t you have a copy of the book? Everything maltedfalcon, TheTornado, fox and me have added so far is correct or at least a plainly visible anomaly in the pictures that could be interpreted as a number or a letter (designated as “?”).
Yeah…you dont understand. I have a copy of the book. I just think that if i add every suggestion to the list it will become convoluted. I mean:
I really appreciate the suggestion and its a great idea. BUT–i personally dont see ANYTHING in that one. Why add a 19 or a 91 to the #’s? To confuse things? Anybody that can read can check the thread and read the suggestions. Like i said if everybody agrrees-up it goes. If you would rather an ‘all possibiliteis’ chart just ask nicely. By the way id love to see a close up of the “IS” in the Sumpter Mask you see. Do you have the ability to do that or can you describe where it is?
Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:17 pm
Don’t Run With Scissors!
That’s the culmination of everything I learned in School….
I think this is supposed to be the IS Â – though I could be wrong its fuzzy.
Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:34 pm
Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:40 pm
We all agree on a few numbers. Â We all disagree on many others. Â No matter how much you make me look at the water on Image 12, I see nothing but a single vertical line of dots in the foam. Â I *might* see the 4 in the dark area posted by Tornado — and it looks more like 54 than 74 to me — but the streaks in the curl of the wave are just streaks to me. Â They simply do not have the “jump off the page” impact as do the numbers in the tree branchs of the Houston image, for example.
If someone wants to list *every* suggested sighting in a chart, that’s fine, they are free to do so. Â But it might be helpful to give them a confidence rating. Â We can all vote on how much weight to give each sighting. Â Otherwise, people are free to stay out of the discussion of clues with which they do not agree.
Tue Jul 06, 2004 7:53 pm
Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:00 pm
Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:08 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
There is a 74 and a possible 19 in the water in pic 12
See the pix about 3 up
it looks more like a 741 to me. unless you mean somewhere different.
where is the 19?
Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:33 pm
Wed Jul 07, 2004 1:14 am
Possible word “Zoo”
Sorry thought I had posted it under image 8
Wed Jul 07, 2004 4:08 am
Wed Jul 07, 2004 5:06 pm