Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:25 pm
Ive put a “?” after ones that are questionable.
PIC—————–#’s—————–LETTERS———
———————————————————
P1 38/122 Roman/G/H
P2 79/80/33/23? n?/h?
P3 5 ??
P4 42/81 ??
P5 41/87 ??
P6 2-(32?82?) ??
P7 29/90/19 ??
P8 95/96/30 “zoo”?
P9 39 X(Roman?)
P10 ?? ??
P11 111/112/41/42 ??
P12 50/15/141? ??
Fri Jul 09, 2004 11:13 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
It seems to me that anywhere in any pic that we see a JP (pic 12?) or IP or 1P we have to consider the possibility that these are the artists initials, both of which are JP.
wilhouse
Good point. I had not thought of this but when looking back at the pic I think I might have to agree – certainly looks like a P and most artists would be inclined to put their initials in. He might even have put them in to distract us.
Fri Jul 09, 2004 5:05 am
wilhouse
Thu Jul 08, 2004 12:43 am
Thu Jul 08, 2004 7:38 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
I don’t understand… You start the thread and don’t want to check our suggestions? Or don’t you have a copy of the book? Everything maltedfalcon, TheTornado, fox and me have added so far is correct or at least a plainly visible anomaly in the pictures that could be interpreted as a number or a letter (designated as “?”).
Yeah…you dont understand. I have a copy of the book. I just think that if i add every suggestion to the list it will become convoluted. I mean:
I really appreciate the suggestion and its a great idea. BUT–i personally dont see ANYTHING in that one. Why add a 19 or a 91 to the #’s? To confuse things? Anybody that can read can check the thread and read the suggestions. Like i said if everybody agrrees-up it goes. If you would rather an ‘all possibiliteis’ chart just ask nicely. By the way id love to see a close up of the “IS” in the Sumpter Mask you see. Do you have the ability to do that or can you describe where it is?
Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:17 pm
Don’t Run With Scissors!
That’s the culmination of everything I learned in School….
I think this is supposed to be the IS – though I could be wrong its fuzzy.
Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:34 pm
Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:40 pm
We all agree on a few numbers. We all disagree on many others. No matter how much you make me look at the water on Image 12, I see nothing but a single vertical line of dots in the foam. I *might* see the 4 in the dark area posted by Tornado — and it looks more like 54 than 74 to me — but the streaks in the curl of the wave are just streaks to me. They simply do not have the “jump off the page” impact as do the numbers in the tree branchs of the Houston image, for example.
If someone wants to list *every* suggested sighting in a chart, that’s fine, they are free to do so. But it might be helpful to give them a confidence rating. We can all vote on how much weight to give each sighting. Otherwise, people are free to stay out of the discussion of clues with which they do not agree.
Tue Jul 06, 2004 7:53 pm
Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:00 pm
Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:08 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
There is a 74 and a possible 19 in the water in pic 12
See the pix about 3 up
it looks more like a 741 to me. unless you mean somewhere different.
where is the 19?
Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:33 pm
Wed Jul 07, 2004 1:14 am
Possible word “Zoo”
Sorry thought I had posted it under image 8
Wed Jul 07, 2004 4:08 am
Wed Jul 07, 2004 5:06 pm