Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:18 pm
Fri Feb 23, 2018 3:29 am
JoshCornell1
solutions are still right, other conditions are beyond my control.
Then share your solves
Fri Feb 23, 2018 4:14 am
Fri Feb 23, 2018 4:18 am
gManTexas
It would probably be best to just go radio silence on Josh and ignore him. He will eventually just stop and go away.
Agreed, complete distraction.
Fri Jul 20, 2018 5:27 am
JoshCornell
wouldve had one in charleston if it wasnt gone from the spot.
Mon Jul 16, 2018 9:54 pm
Sat Feb 24, 2018 2:39 am
JoshCornell1
it was not touched by the construction.
Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:17 pm
fox
Nor was it touched by you
Damn fox! You keep beating me to the punchline…with better punchlines!!!
Sat Feb 24, 2018 9:13 am
JoshCornell1
it was not touched by the construction.
Nor was it touched by you
Thu Feb 22, 2018 2:46 am
JoshCornell1
you laugh cause your ignorant to the truth lol…but w.e. as long as you stay outta mah park, son!
Exactly why nobody takes you seriously, at all. Everyone can see the truth from 3 idiots who make stupid claims and dumb theories with zero to back it up. You are not the first ones to jump on google maps after looking at wiki and saying I found it and gloating before you can even go to the site, since none of you are even in NYC!
\
Go take a bath and get ready for school tomorrow, son! You ain’t slapping a damn thing!
Thu Feb 22, 2018 7:11 am
JoshCornell1
ohhh k then. you wont be rolling round laughin for long…
Where have I heard that before? Oh yeah, from you right before you were going to dig up the 10 remaining casques. Good God Josh, give it a rest. Please
Thu Jul 19, 2018 2:25 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
Did you just say, your “solution” is so good you don’t need to dig up the casque?
I’ll let Josh speak for himself, preferably after he has fully explored his dig spot. But should be come up empty, he would not be the first to conclude that 36 years later, the solve is correct and the casque is destroyed beyond recognition or gone altogether. Wasn’t that the whole point of the most recent “Shhh The Secret Podcast” in New Orleans?
Thu Jul 19, 2018 2:51 pm
Euhirudinea
I’ll let Josh speak for himself, preferably after he has fully explored his dig spot. But should be come up empty, he would not be the first to conclude that 36 years later, the solve is correct and the casque is destroyed beyond recognition or gone altogether. Wasn’t that the whole point of the most recent “Shhh The Secret Podcast” in New Orleans?
Specifically no- The point was, they found something they are not sure about, They are still working on it. so in the meantime treat NO as if it hasn’t been found, Exactly the opposite of what Josh claims.
Thu Jul 19, 2018 3:29 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
The point was, they found something they are not sure about
On a good day, George is 90% sure. But in all fairness, that is still not in Josh’s league.
Thu Jul 19, 2018 4:13 pm
Euhirudinea
On a good day, George is 90% sure. But in all fairness, that is still not in Josh’s league.
To quote George on the podcast “I am not comfortable without a key or a full casque to say I found this Casque. We don’t know”
To quote Josh “seeing as the location didnt change im not sure digging it up would corroborate that or not”
which is why I asked what he meant exactly.
Thu Jul 19, 2018 4:41 pm
Thu Jul 19, 2018 4:47 pm
Thu Jul 19, 2018 4:49 pm
Thu Jul 19, 2018 4:54 pm
Thu Jul 19, 2018 4:55 pm
Thu Jul 19, 2018 5:21 pm
JoshCornell
what i mean is that you can clearly dig up a casque without properly accounting for all the clues (based on found casques)…i have accounted for all the clues in nyc…but it didnt change the location from when i made mistakes…so, digging it up at said location will not corroborate you having all clues correct. thats what i meant
Ah! I understant what you meant now.
Thu Jul 19, 2018 5:55 am
JoshCornell
seeing as the location didnt change im not sure digging it up would corroborate that or not lol
Did you just say, your “solution” is so good you don’t need to dig up the casque?
Tue Jul 17, 2018 11:16 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
my solution for this is beyond perfect
Said everybody who has ever dug a hole. What matters is what you say after you come up empty. There are four choices if you conclude that the casque is still retrievable:
1) I’m digging in the wrong spot.
2) I’m digging in the wrong Treasure Ground.
3) I’m digging in the wrong Park.
4) I’m digging in the wrong City.
If, on the other hand, you conclude that the casque is no longer retrievable, then there really is only one choice.
Tue Jul 17, 2018 11:30 am
maltedfalcon
Except White Rabbit actually had a logical progression to get there.
Yup….and, was (is) open to alternatives.
Tue Jul 17, 2018 11:31 pm
5) it’s already been dug up
Tue Jul 17, 2018 11:34 pm
AlaskaCasqueFinder
I wish I could put myself back in the eighties ….. no cell phone leash or answering machines. It would also be nice to buy something at a store, use cash and the clerk not ask to “borrow a couple fingers or calculator ” to figure change. Ahhh, the good ol’ days.
Yup, that’s spot on, Adam….I’m with ya.
The ’70’s would work for me too…
Tue Jul 17, 2018 11:53 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
5) it’s already been dug up
A casque that has been dug up is by definition, no longer retrievable. At least not in its original location.
Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:04 am
AlaskaCasqueFinder
Hello , can you post your solve? Did you find the casque? Just trying to get ideas that may help with what I’m Thinking for San Francisco. Thanks, Adam
The end point of Josh’s ‘solution’ is virtually the same as White Rabbit’s, but for different reasons:
Across the street from Fort Hamilton High School in Brooklyn…where construction has been going on for a while.
Tue Jul 17, 2018 12:07 am
Mister EZ
The end point of Josh’s ‘solution’ is virtually the same as White Rabbit’s, but for different reasons:
Across the street from Fort Hamilton High School in Brooklyn…where construction has been going on for a while.
Except White Rabbit actually had a logical progression to get there.
Tue Jul 17, 2018 3:39 pm
Tue Jul 17, 2018 3:48 pm
AlaskaCasqueFinder
Verse 5 Two Twenty Two – How can this NOT mean Ansel Adams Birthday? Have an excellent day! Adam
Hey Adam
Well first it has the word “Lane” in front of it.
2nd in 1979-1980s time frame Ansel Adams was big, also still alive and still publishing books.
So the question is would a publisher use a living author/photographer/ client of a different publishing house as a clue in a proprietary hunt.
honestly probably not.
Also Adam’s biography had not been published yet, (no internet) most people would have no clue when his birthday was or why they should even care…
Remember to stop looking at the clues with a eye from today, and put your self back to the 1980s
Tue Jul 17, 2018 5:17 pm
Tue Jul 17, 2018 8:05 pm
get outta here.
my solution for this is beyond perfect.
Tue Jul 17, 2018 8:31 pm
Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:25 pm
The more you know…
Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:52 pm
NYCNative
which he specifically said it would not be around any property that was personal to any of the people who contributed to the book.
No he didn’t.
Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:53 pm
That being said, did you talk to any of the people who explored this area in depth 7 or so years ago?
They might have valuable input on thing you have missed because of access/construction.
Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:05 pm
burnstyle
No he didn’t.
Awesome! Good luck with your search!
Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:07 pm
maltedfalcon
On q4t a solution isn’t valid or complete unless the casque is found – otherwise we would have “awarded” wilhouse the houston solve long ago
That being said, did you talk to any of the people who explored this area in depth 7 or so years ago?
They might have valuable input on thing you have missed because of access/construction.
I am sure he doesn’t want to speak with anyone who will shoot down this theory. Let him
himself!
Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:11 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
The following places do not hold any treasure:
(a) any life-threatening location, such as a dangerous highway embankment, a contaminated area or active railway track
(b) any cemetery
(c) any public or private flower bed
(d) any property owned by the contributors to the book, their families or friends
What the book says is:
Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:20 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
d) any property owned by the contributors of the book, their families or friends.
As much as anything else, I think this clause was meant to discourage searchers from bothering people close to Preiss for inside information, and/or digging on their private property. I don’t think it necessarily rules out Fort Hamilton High School or the surrounding area.
Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:25 pm
Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:36 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
Well good luck with the site!
Oh, I don’t think it’s there either. I’m just pointing out that there is nothing in the rules that says it can’t be.
Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:39 pm
Euhirudinea
Oh, I don’t think it’s there either. I’m just pointing out that there is nothing in the rules that says it can’t be.
Good on you!
Wed Jan 24, 2018 6:28 pm
Wed Jan 24, 2018 7:46 pm
Wed Jan 24, 2018 8:09 pm
1. The clock face on the school.
2. There used to be a “V” shape walkway in the park across the street.
3. The slender path = Narrows Ave
4. The square that everyone think is either a “Twin Tower” OR “Ellis island dock”, is actually the front walkway of the school.
There are other visuals that point here as well… problem is the construction thats been there for a while.
Wed Jan 24, 2018 8:22 pm
Wed Jul 18, 2018 12:41 am
Euhirudinea
A casque that has been dug up is by definition, no longer retrievable. At least not in its original location.
True I see your point. Too bad Priess thought to bury them. Even if I knew the exact location I don’t think I would go to a public park and just start digging. Too many laws and I’d probably hit a water main or power line with my luck.
Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:31 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
Says the guy who trolled here for weeks
Troll-like is a more apt description of your posts on this forum than Josh’s. While most of what Josh posts is redundant nonsense that only makes sense to him, there are elements of his methods that actually ring true if you take the time to understand where he is coming from. You, on the other hand, in post after post after post, add next to nothing to the forum in general, and to the puzzle specifically. Seriously GG, why are you here? Surely you have better things to do with your time than troll Josh.
Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:51 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
Too bad Priess thought to bury them.
Burying them, and then having someone else dig them up, was just about the only way he could guarantee the integrity of the puzzle. But I really don’t think he intended to have people digging random holes. That is, until he no longer cared whether the casques were recovered and the jewels were claimed.
Wed Jul 18, 2018 2:51 pm
Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:06 pm
Unknown
Unknown:
i didnt have all the clues right, now i do
Only one way to know for sure. Here’s hoping the dig is successful.
Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:24 pm